README.md
November 20, 2025 · View on GitHub

RIS-LAD: Referring Low-Altitude Drone Image Segmentation
RIS-LAD is the first fine-grained Referring Image Segmentation benchmark for low-altitude drone (LAD) scenes, featuring 13,871 image–text–mask triplets.
We introduce SAARN (Semantic-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Network) with CDLE and ARFM to tackle LAD-specific category drift and object drift.
🔗 Quick Links
- Paper (arXiv): https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20920
- Dataset (Google Drive): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PmtaQH_F0AUoGWgpmDSpPu27E2XSdGd4/view?usp=sharing
- Model & Code: coming soon
🧾 Introduction
Low-altitude drones (typically operating below ~200 m) are increasingly deployed in real-world perception systems thanks to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness. However, most existing referring image segmentation (RIS) research focuses on conventional ground-view scenes or high-altitude remote sensing imagery. These settings differ substantially from low-altitude drone (LAD) views, where perspectives are oblique, objects are tiny and densely packed, and illumination varies widely (including night scenes).
To bridge this gap, we present RIS-LAD, a fine-grained benchmark specifically designed for Referring Low-Altitude Drone Image Segmentation (RLADIS). RIS-LAD offers 13,871 carefully verified image–text–mask triplets collected from real LAD footage. Beyond providing data, RIS-LAD formalizes two key failure modes frequently observed under LAD settings:
- Category drift: when tiny targets cause models to latch onto larger, semantically similar objects.
- Object drift: when crowds of same-class instances lead to confusion about which instance the expression refers to.
We further propose SAARN (Semantic-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Network) to tackle these challenges. SAARN introduces:
- CDLE (Category-Dominated Linguistic Enhancement): injects class-level linguistic cues early in the encoder to anchor visual features to the correct category and suppress category drift.
- ARFM (Adaptive Reasoning Fusion Module): performs scale-aware fusion of global (l), class (c), and descriptive (d) text cues, enabling coarse→fine reasoning and disambiguation among dense same-class instances.
RIS-LAD is built with a semi-automatic pipeline that combines high-quality instance masks (prompted SAM-2) and multimodal LLM–generated initial expressions (given cropped instances and location cues), followed by human refinement. Experiments on RIS-LAD show that SAARN achieves state-of-the-art results on core segmentation metrics and yields pronounced gains at stricter localization thresholds (e.g., P@0.9), demonstrating stronger instance-level discrimination under LAD conditions.
✨ Highlights

Figure 1. RLADIS challenges vs. RRSIS (category/object drift, tiny & dense objects, illumination).
-
Low-altitude & oblique views (≈30–100 m, 30°–60°) → strong perspective change & foreshortening.
-
Tiny & dense targets → easy confusion among many same-class instances.
-
Variable illumination (incl. night) → distribution shift from standard RS/RIS datasets.
-
Category drift: tiny targets bias the model to large, semantically similar objects.
-
Object drift: crowded same-class instances hinder precise instance selection.
📊 Dataset Characteristics
| Dataset | Image Source | Shooting Angle | Nighttime Scene |
|---|---|---|---|
| RefDIOR | Google Earth | fixed | ✗ |
| NWPU-Refer | Google Earth | fixed | ✗ |
| RISBench | Google Earth, GF-2, JL-1 | fixed | ✗ |
| RefSegRS | Helicopter (above 1000 m) | fixed | ✗ |
| RRSIS-D | Google Earth | fixed | ✗ |
| RIS-LAD (ours) | Drone (30–100 m) | 30°–60° | ✓ |
📈 Benchmark Results
| Method | Publication | oIoU (Val) | oIoU (Test) | mIoU (Val) | mIoU (Test) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAVT | CVPR 2022 | 44.03 | 41.97 | 32.25 | 30.14 |
| ASDA | MM 2024 | 38.70 | 37.53 | 35.46 | 33.33 |
| VATEX | WACV 2025 | 24.83 | 24.27 | 20.32 | 18.53 |
| LGCE | IEEE TGRS 2024 | 41.72 | 40.75 | 27.68 | 26.17 |
| FIANet | IEEE TGRS 2024 | 45.24 | 43.39 | 39.61 | 37.44 |
| RMSIN | CVPR 2024 | 50.17 | 48.82 | 42.08 | 39.60 |
| RSRefSeg | IGARSS 2025 | 50.04 | 47.71 | 43.42 | 41.16 |
| CADFormer | JSTARS 2025 | 47.37 | 46.47 | 41.36 | 39.32 |
| SAARN (ours) | — | 51.54 | 49.60 | 44.30 | 41.67 |
🖼️ Qualitative Comparisons

Qualitative Results. SAARN vs. prior SOTA on tiny-object and dense same-class cases.
🧭 Roadmap
- Release training & evaluation code for SAARN
- Add dataset loaders for popular toolkits
- Provide pretrained weights & full configs
- Add extended qualitative gallery and failure cases
📝 Citation
@misc{ye2025risladbenchmarkmodelreferring,
title = {RIS-LAD: A Benchmark and Model for Referring Low-Altitude Drone Image Segmentation},
author = {Kai Ye and YingShi Luan and Zhudi Chen and Guangyue Meng and Pingyang Dai and Liujuan Cao},
year = {2025},
eprint = {2507.20920},
archivePrefix= {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.CV},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20920}
}
📫 Contact & License
- Issues or questions: yekai@stu.xmu.edu.cn
- Dataset: research use only (see dataset README)
- Code: license will be provided upon release