dag-cbor-benchmark
March 28, 2026 ยท View on GitHub
Test data for benchmarking dag-cbor decoders and encoders
The following test cases came from https://github.com/serde-rs/json-benchmark, converted from JSON to DAG-CBOR. They're very "real world", but don't contain any CBOR-specific data types (bytes, CIDs).
data/canada.json.dagcbor 1_056_200 bytes - many lists of floats
data/citm_catalog.json.dagcbor 342_373 bytes - moderately nested objects, including unicode strings
data/twitter.json.dagcbor 402_814 btyes - ditto
Trivial test cases:
data/trivial_helloworld.dagcbor 14 bytes - A hello world string (sanity check and/or test constant overheads)
Synthetic torture tests:
data/torture_nested_lists.dagcbor 10_000_001 bytes - 10M nested lists
data/torture_nested_maps.dagcbor 20_000_001 bytes - 10M nested maps (each with empty-string keys)
data/torture_cids.dagcbor 4_100_005 btyes - 100K CIDs (in a flat list)
TODO: gather some more real-world DAG-CBOR from bluesky, ideally anonymised (maybe just the MST blocks?)
TODO: include CAR test cases
Python shootout:
Results of bench.py, on Python 3.13.12, Fedora 42, 2021 M1 Pro MBP
Contestants:
- DavidBuchanan314/dag-cbrrr (release v1.1.0)
- MarshalX/python-libipld (release v3.3.2)
- hashberg-io/dag-cbor (release v0.3.3)
Hello World Decode:
===================
cbrrr : 213 ns
libipld : 83 ns
dag_cbor : 6323 ns
Hello World Encode:
===================
cbrrr : 107 ns
libipld : 87 ns
dag_cbor : 7171 ns
Realistic Decode Tests:
=======================
canada.json.dagcbor cbrrr : 3.75 ms (268.85 MB/s)
canada.json.dagcbor libipld : 4.10 ms (245.97 MB/s)
canada.json.dagcbor dag_cbor : 119.39 ms (8.44 MB/s)
citm_catalog.json.dagcbor cbrrr : 2.29 ms (142.48 MB/s)
citm_catalog.json.dagcbor libipld : 2.26 ms (144.55 MB/s)
citm_catalog.json.dagcbor dag_cbor : 49.20 ms (6.64 MB/s)
twitter.json.dagcbor cbrrr : 1.29 ms (297.85 MB/s)
twitter.json.dagcbor libipld : 1.29 ms (297.99 MB/s)
twitter.json.dagcbor dag_cbor : 20.90 ms (18.38 MB/s)
Realistic Encode Tests:
=======================
canada.json.dagcbor cbrrr : 1.10 ms (912.36 MB/s)
canada.json.dagcbor libipld : 0.97 ms (1035.73 MB/s)
canada.json.dagcbor dag_cbor : 205.62 ms (4.90 MB/s)
citm_catalog.json.dagcbor cbrrr : 1.31 ms (249.47 MB/s)
citm_catalog.json.dagcbor libipld : 1.31 ms (248.73 MB/s)
citm_catalog.json.dagcbor dag_cbor : 60.35 ms (5.41 MB/s)
twitter.json.dagcbor cbrrr : 0.64 ms (597.26 MB/s)
twitter.json.dagcbor libipld : 0.50 ms (771.94 MB/s)
twitter.json.dagcbor dag_cbor : 23.05 ms (16.66 MB/s)
Decode Torture Tests:
=====================
torture_cids.dagcbor cbrrr 22.1 ms (176.75 MB/s)
torture_cids.dagcbor libipld 9.8 ms (399.89 MB/s)
torture_cids.dagcbor dag_cbor 9637.9 ms (0.41 MB/s)
torture_nested_lists.dagcbor cbrrr 717.6 ms (13.29 MB/s)
torture_nested_lists.dagcbor libipld ERROR: RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in DAG-CBOR decoding
torture_nested_lists.dagcbor dag_cbor ERROR: maximum recursion depth exceeded
torture_nested_maps.dagcbor cbrrr 1315.4 ms (14.50 MB/s)
torture_nested_maps.dagcbor libipld ERROR: RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in DAG-CBOR decoding
torture_nested_maps.dagcbor dag_cbor ERROR: maximum recursion depth exceeded
Note: "maximum recursion depth exceeded" is an acceptable result for the recursion torture tests - a segfault isn't though :P