📊 Hack23 AB — ISMS Policy Mapping for Game Template

🛡️ Complete Feature-to-Policy Mapping
🎯 Demonstrating transparency, security excellence, and compliance alignment

📋 Document Owner: CEO | 📄 Version: 1.0 | 📅 Last Updated: 2025-11-10 (UTC)
🔄 Review Cycle: Quarterly | ⏰ Next Review: 2026-02-10

---

🎯 Purpose

"At Hack23 AB, we believe in radical transparency. This mapping demonstrates how every security feature in our game template aligns with our comprehensive Information Security Management System (ISMS), providing verifiable evidence of our commitment to security excellence."

— James Pether Sörling, CEO, Hack23 AB

This document provides a comprehensive mapping between the Hack23 AB game template features, security controls, and the publicly available ISMS policies. This mapping enables:

• 🔍 Transparency - Clear traceability from implementation to policy
• ✅ Verification - Auditable evidence of security compliance
• 📚 Education - Understanding security requirements and their implementation
• 🤝 Trust - Demonstrating commitment to security best practices

---

📋 Core ISMS Policy References

🔐 Security Foundation Policies

Policy	Purpose	Link
🔐 Information Security Policy	Overarching security governance and principles	View Policy
🛠️ Secure Development Policy	SDLC, testing, deployment, and CI/CD requirements	View Policy
📦 Open Source Policy	Open source usage, license compliance, supply chain security	View Policy
🏷️ Data Classification Policy	Data sensitivity levels, handling requirements	View Policy
🔒 Privacy Policy	Personal data protection, GDPR compliance	View Policy
🔑 Access Control Policy	Authentication, authorization, identity management	View Policy

---

🎮 Game Template Feature to Policy Mapping

🛡️ Supply Chain Security

Feature	Implementation	ISMS Policy Reference	Evidence
OSSF Scorecard	Automated supply chain security assessment	Open Source Policy Secure Development Policy
Dependency Review	Automated dependency vulnerability checks	Open Source Policy	Dependency Review Workflow
License Compliance	Automated checking of dependency licenses	Open Source Policy	npm run test:licenses
SBOM Generation	Software Bill of Materials for transparency	Open Source Policy Secure Development Policy	SPDX format in releases
SBOM Quality Validation	Automated SBOM quality scoring (min 7.0/10)	Secure Development Policy	SBOMQS validation in CI
Pinned Dependencies	All GitHub Actions pinned to SHA hashes	Secure Development Policy	../.github/workflows/*.yml

🔍 Static and Dynamic Analysis

Feature	Implementation	ISMS Policy Reference	Evidence
CodeQL Scanning	Static code analysis for vulnerabilities	Secure Development Policy Information Security Policy	CodeQL Workflow
ZAP Security Scanning	OWASP ZAP dynamic application security testing	Secure Development Policy	ZAP Workflow
ESLint	Code quality and security linting	Secure Development Policy	npm run lint

🧪 Testing and Quality Assurance

Feature	Implementation	ISMS Policy Reference	Evidence
Unit Testing	Vitest with 80%+ coverage requirement	Secure Development Policy	npm run test
E2E Testing	Cypress end-to-end testing	Secure Development Policy	npm run test:e2e
Coverage Reporting	Automated coverage reports in CI/CD	Secure Development Policy	Vitest coverage reports
Lighthouse Audits	Performance and accessibility audits	Secure Development Policy	Lighthouse Workflow

🔏 Build Integrity and Attestations

Feature	Implementation	ISMS Policy Reference	Evidence
Build Attestations	SLSA-compliant build provenance	Secure Development Policy Information Security Policy	gh attestation verify
Immutable Releases	Release artifacts cannot be tampered with	Secure Development Policy Data Classification Policy	GitHub release settings
Artifact Signing	Cryptographic proof of build integrity	Secure Development Policy	Build attestations

🔐 Security Infrastructure

Feature	Implementation	ISMS Policy Reference	Evidence
Runner Hardening	All CI/CD runners hardened with audit logging	Secure Development Policy Access Control Policy	Workflow configurations
Security Advisories	GitHub security advisories and vulnerability reporting	Information Security Policy	SECURITY.md
Security Policies	Documented security practices and reporting	Information Security Policy	SECURITY.md

👥 Development Environment

Feature	Implementation	ISMS Policy Reference	Evidence
GitHub Codespaces	Secure, hardened development environment	Secure Development Policy Access Control Policy	.devcontainer
GitHub Copilot	AI-assisted development with security guidelines	Secure Development Policy	copilot-instructions.md
Custom Agents	Specialized agents including security specialist	Secure Development Policy	.github/agents

🏷️ Data Classification

Feature	Implementation	ISMS Policy Reference	Evidence
Public Repository	All code and documentation publicly accessible	Data Classification Policy Privacy Policy	GitHub public repository
No Sensitive Data	Template contains no sensitive or personal data	Privacy Policy Data Classification Policy	Repository audit

---

🔄 CI/CD Pipeline Mapping

Security Gate Enforcement

graph TD
    A[🚀 Code Push/PR] --> B{🛡️ Security Gates}
    
    B -->|🔍 SAST| C[CodeQL Analysis]
    B -->|📦 SCA| D[Dependency Review]
    B -->|📜 License| E[License Compliance]
    B -->|🏗️ Supply Chain| F[OSSF Scorecard]
    B -->|📋 SBOM| G[SBOM Quality Check]
    
    C -->|Vulnerabilities?| H{Block?}
    D -->|CVEs?| H
    E -->|Invalid License?| H
    F -->|Low Score?| H
    G -->|Quality < 7.0?| H
    
    H -->|Yes| I[🚫 Merge Blocked]
    H -->|No| J[✅ Merge Allowed]
    
    J --> K[🧪 Test Suite]
    K --> L[🏗️ Build]
    L --> M[🔏 Attest]
    M --> N[📦 Release]
    
    style A fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,stroke-width:2px
    style B fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ef6c00,stroke-width:2px
    style C fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px
    style D fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px
    style E fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px
    style F fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px
    style G fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px
    style H fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ef6c00,stroke-width:2px
    style I fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828,stroke-width:2px
    style J fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px
    style K fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,stroke-width:2px
    style L fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,stroke-width:2px
    style M fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2,stroke-width:2px
    style N fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px

Policy Alignment:

• 🔍 SAST (CodeQL) → Secure Development Policy
• 📦 SCA (Dependency Review) → Open Source Policy
• 📜 License Compliance → Open Source Policy
• 🏗️ Supply Chain (OSSF) → Open Source Policy
• 📋 SBOM Quality → Secure Development Policy
• 🔏 Attestations → Secure Development Policy

---

📊 Compliance Framework Alignment

ISO 27001:2022 Controls

Control	Description	Game Template Implementation	ISMS Policy
A.8.29	Security in development and support processes	CI/CD security gates, CodeQL, dependency scanning	Secure Development Policy
A.8.30	Outsourced development	Open source dependency management, license compliance	Open Source Policy
A.8.31	Separation of development, test and production environments	Branch protection, environment-specific configurations	Secure Development Policy
A.8.32	Change management	Automated testing, PR reviews, protected branches	Secure Development Policy
A.5.23	Information security for use of cloud services	GitHub infrastructure, secure Codespaces	Information Security Policy

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Function	Category	Game Template Implementation	ISMS Policy
IDENTIFY	Asset Management (ID.AM)	SBOM generation, dependency inventory	Open Source Policy
PROTECT	Protective Technology (PR.PT)	Secure coding, input validation, type safety	Secure Development Policy
DETECT	Security Continuous Monitoring (DE.CM)	CodeQL, dependency review, OSSF Scorecard	Secure Development Policy
RESPOND	Analysis (RS.AN)	Security advisories, vulnerability reporting	Information Security Policy
RECOVER	Recovery Planning (RC.RP)	Immutable releases, version control	Secure Development Policy

CIS Controls v8.1

Control	Description	Game Template Implementation	ISMS Policy
2	Inventory and Control of Software Assets	SBOM, dependency tracking	Open Source Policy
16	Application Software Security	SAST, DAST, secure coding practices	Secure Development Policy
18	Penetration Testing	ZAP security scanning	Secure Development Policy

---

🎯 Using This Mapping

For Developers

1. Understand Requirements: Reference the appropriate ISMS policy before implementing features
2. Security by Design: Use the mapping to ensure security controls are built-in
3. Testing: Follow testing requirements outlined in Secure Development Policy
4. Dependencies: Review Open Source Policy before adding dependencies

For Auditors

1. Traceability: Each security control links to implementation and policy
2. Evidence: All claims are backed by verifiable evidence (badges, workflows, reports)
3. Compliance: Framework alignment demonstrates regulatory compliance
4. Verification: Use provided links to audit actual implementations

For Security Teams

1. Risk Assessment: Understand what security controls are in place
2. Gap Analysis: Identify areas where additional controls may be needed
3. Incident Response: Reference Information Security Policy for procedures
4. Vulnerability Management: Follow Secure Development Policy requirements

---

📚 Related Documents

---

📚 Related Documents

Internal Documentation

• 📖 README.md - Project overview and quick start
• 🔒 SECURITY.md - Security policy and vulnerability reporting
• 🛡️ Security Headers - Security headers implementation
• 🤖 Copilot Instructions - Secure coding guidelines
• 🎮 Custom Agents - Specialized development agents
• 🔐 Security Specialist Agent - Security expert agent

ISMS-PUBLIC Core Policies

• 🔐 Information Security Policy - Overall security governance
• 🛠️ Secure Development Policy - SDLC and CI/CD requirements
• 📦 Open Source Policy - Supply chain security
• 🏷️ Data Classification Policy - Data handling requirements
• 🔒 Privacy Policy - Privacy and GDPR compliance
• 🔑 Access Control Policy - Authentication and authorization
• 🏷️ Classification Framework - CIA triad and impact levels

---

📋 Document Control:
✅ Approved by: James Pether Sörling, CEO
📤 Distribution: Public
🏷️ Classification:
📅 Effective Date: 2025-11-10
⏰ Next Review: 2026-02-10
🎯 Framework Compliance:

---