π Cross-Run Diff Template
May 3, 2026 Β· View on GitHub
π Template Instructions β Copy to
analysis/daily/$ARTICLE_DATE/$SUBFOLDER/cross-run-diff.md. Bayesian delta vs. the previous run of the same article type: what changed in data and assessment. Seeper-artifact-methodologies.md Β§cross-run-diff. N/A when this is the first ever run of its type.
π― Purpose β Track evolution of political assessment across runs. For each prior-run finding, apply Bayesian update based on new evidence to produce a posterior assessment with an explicit WEP band shift.
π Tradecraft Context
- Artifact role β Compares the current run against the immediately previous run of the same article type to identify material changes in evidence, assessment, and confidence.
- When to use β Required for every non-initial run. If this is the first ever run for the article type, mark this artifact
N/Aand state that no prior baseline exists. - Primary inputs β Current-run core artifacts, prior-run core artifacts, prior
synthesis-summary.md, priorreference-analysis-quality.md, and any newly surfaced source evidence that materially changes the posterior judgement. - Analytical standard β Use explicit Bayesian-style updating: identify what changed, explain whether each change strengthens, weakens, or leaves unchanged the prior assessment, and record any resulting WEP band movement with concise justification.
- Output requirement β Focus only on deltas that matter for editorial judgement, risk framing, or confidence. Do not restate unchanged background unless needed to explain a shift.
π Template Contract β every fill of this template MUST satisfy this row.
Slot Value Owning methodology per-artifact-methodologies.mdOwning gate check Supplementary Check 11 (gate-required when ANALYSIS_RUN_COUNT β₯ 2) β see 05-analysis-gate.mdRequired inputs previous run folder of same article type Horizon band per-run (per scripts/horizon-context.ts)Output family Operational Supplementary Aggregation order appended (alphabetical, after canonical block) (see scripts/render-lib/aggregator/order.ts)Reader Intelligence Guide row generated from cross-run-diff.md(seescripts/render-lib/aggregator/reader-guide.ts)Canonical evidence anchor | claim | evidence (dok_id / vote / MP intressent_id / primary-source URL) | retrieved_at | confidence |β every analytical claim row uses this schema.Cross-reference:
README.md Β§Template β Methodology β Gate-Check Matrix.
π Document Metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Report ID | [REQUIRED: XRD-YYYY-MM-DD-runNN] |
| Current Run | [REQUIRED: {type}-run{N}, YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Prior Run | [REQUIRED: {type}-run{N-1}, YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Days Between Runs | [REQUIRED: #] |
| Confidence in Delta | [REQUIRED: π’ / π‘ / π΄] |
1οΈβ£ Prior-Run Header
Prior run directory β [REQUIRED: analysis/daily/YYYY-MM-DD/{type}-run{N-1}/]
Prior run date β [REQUIRED]
Prior run gate status β [REQUIRED: β
PASSED / β FAILED]
Key findings from prior synthesis-summary.md:
[REQUIRED: 1-line prior finding + its WEP band][REQUIRED][REQUIRED][REQUIRED][REQUIRED]
Prior scores (carry forward from prior reference-analysis-quality.md Β§Overall judgement):
| Metric | Prior value |
|---|---|
| Weighted quality score | [#/10] |
| Reliability score (MCP) | [#] |
| Coverage (core artifacts) | [#]/23 |
| P0 claims | [#] |
| Admiralty A-rated sources | [#] |
2οΈβ£ New Evidence Since Prior Run
| Evidence ID | Source | Date | Artifact affected | Admiralty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
[dok_id / vote ID / URL] | [riksdag-regering / scb / IMF / press] | [YYYY-MM-DD] | [current run artifact] | [A1/β¦] |
Minimum β β₯ 3 new evidence rows when days-between β₯ 3; β₯ 1 otherwise. Zero new evidence on a multi-day gap β flag prior run's stability claim.
2.1 IMF Vintage Delta
| Indicator | Prior vintage | Current vintage | Prior value (year) | Current value (year) | Ξ (pp) | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEO:NGDP_RPCH | WEO-2025-10 | WEO-2026-04 | [e.g. 1.8 % (2026)] | [e.g. 2.1 % (2026)] | +0.3 | [update / no-op] |
WEO:GGXWDG_NGDP | WEO-2025-10 | WEO-2026-04 | [e.g. 32.1 % (2027)] | [e.g. 32.4 % (2027)] | +0.3 | [update] |
WEO:PCPIPCH | WEO-2025-10 | WEO-2026-04 | β | β | β | β |
Rule: any headline indicator whose projection shifted by > 0.5 pp across vintages gets a
[VINTAGE-DELTA]annotation in the article commentary, and prior-run citations are rewritten to the current vintage. Add a sentence in Β§3 Bayesian Update explaining the methodology shift. Stale-vintage citations (> 6 months old per.github/aw/ECONOMIC_DATA_CONTRACT.mdΒ§ Vintage staleness rule) MUST be refreshed before publish.
3οΈβ£ Bayesian Update β Key Judgments
For each prior KJ, apply posterior β prior Γ likelihood(new evidence | KJ) and state the new WEP band.
KJ 1 β [REQUIRED: prior KJ headline]
- Prior WEP β
[e.g. Likely (55-70%), 6-month horizon] - New evidence β
[list evidence IDs from Β§2 that bear on this KJ] - Likelihood assessment β
[does new evidence confirm / disconfirm / condition?] - Posterior WEP β
[e.g. Very Likely (70-85%), 6-month horizon] - Shift rationale β
[2-3 sentences naming the evidence and its Admiralty]
(Repeat for each prior KJ.)
4οΈβ£ Scenario Probability Shifts
Scenario (from prior scenario-analysis.md) | Prior P | Posterior P | Ξ | Trigger evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
[REQUIRED] | [%] | [%] | [Β±%] | [evidence ID] |
[REQUIRED] | [%] | [%] | [Β±%] | [evidence ID] |
[REQUIRED] | [%] | [%] | [Β±%] | [evidence ID] |
Sum of posteriors must equal 100%.
5οΈβ£ Risk & Threat Register Deltas
| Prior row | Prior LΓI | Posterior LΓI | Ξ | New row? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
[REQUIRED] | [score] | [score] | [Β±] | [n] |
Rows added this run: [#]. Rows retired: [#] (with justification).
6οΈβ£ Stakeholder Position Changes
| Actor | Prior position | Posterior position | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
[REQUIRED: MP + intressent_id / party / myndighet] | [support/oppose/ambiguous] | [β¦] | [speech ID / vote ID] |
7οΈβ£ Framing Evolution
Cross-reference the longitudinal frame record in media-framing-analysis.md:
- Prior dominant frame β
[REQUIRED] - Current dominant frame β
[REQUIRED] - Shift driver β
[data / political / external event] - Counter-frame status β
[emerging / stable / absorbed]
8οΈβ£ Methodology Drift Check
Any methodology or template version changes between the two runs? List them and their impact on comparability:
| Change | Prior version | Current version | Comparability impact |
|---|---|---|---|
[REQUIRED] | [vX.Y] | [vX.Y] | [none / rescored / incomparable] |
If comparability is incomparable, downgrade overall diff confidence to π΄ and flag in methodology-reflection.md.
9οΈβ£ Summary Table
| Dimension | Prior | Current | Ξ | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | [#/10] | [#/10] | [Β±] | [β/β/=] |
| KJ count | [#] | [#] | [Β±] | [β¦] |
| P0 claims | [#] | [#] | [Β±] | [β¦] |
| Admiralty A-rated | [#] | [#] | [Β±] | [β¦] |
| Scenario entropy | [#] | [#] | [Β±] | [β¦] |
| Top risk LΓI | [#] | [#] | [Β±] | [β¦] |
π Headline Posterior BLUF
One paragraph (3β5 sentences) summarising the single largest shift in assessment, with WEP band + horizon + Admiralty of the triggering evidence. This paragraph feeds directly into the next synthesis-summary.md BLUF.
π Cross-References
- Methodology:
../methodologies/per-artifact-methodologies.md#cross-run-diff - Prior synthesis:
[REQUIRED: link to prior run's synthesis-summary.md] - Current synthesis:
synthesis-summary.md - SAT canon:
../methodologies/osint-tradecraft-standards.md
Template version: v1.2 Β· Last updated: 2026-04-25
β Pass-2 Self-Audit Checklist (v4.4 β required)
Purpose: AI-FIRST principle requires a Pass-2 read-back-and-improve. After producing this artifact in Pass 1, re-read it end-to-end and verify each item below. Document any remediation in
methodology-reflection.mdΒ§"Pass-2 audit log". Any unchecked β box at the end of Pass 2 forces a Pass-3 rewrite of the affected section.
- Tradecraft anchors honoured β F3EAD stage matches the artifact's role; PIRs declared in the Β§Tradecraft Context block are actually addressed in the body; Admiralty grades attached to every external source; WEP band + ODNI confidence on every probabilistic judgement.
- Source diversity floor met β at least the minimum number of independent MCP sources required by the artifact's tradecraft block are cited; single-source claims are explicitly labelled
[SINGLE-SOURCE β corroboration pending]. - Evidence specificity β every quantified claim cites a
dok_id(Riksdag), an SCB / IMF dataflow code, or a named external source with date; no "according to data" / "studies show" hand-waves. - Named-actor discipline β every political claim names β₯ 1 person (party + role + dated act/quote) or labels the absence (
[diffuse β no named actor]). - Counter-narrative present β at least one explicit competing hypothesis, dissent quote, or framed objection appears in the body; "no opposition recorded" is itself a finding to label, not silence.
- Election 2026 lens applied β the Β§"Election 2026 Implications" subsection (or equivalent) addresses electoral salience, coalition pressure, and forward indicators; not boilerplate.
- No illustrative content shipped as fact β every
[REQUIRED]placeholder is filled OR removed; everyExample:block is clearly fenced or removed; no fabricateddok_id, vote count, or quote leaks into the final artifact. - Cross-references resolve β every
[link](file.md)in this artifact points to a file that exists in the run folder (analysis/daily/$ARTICLE_DATE/$SUBFOLDER/) or to a methodology / template underanalysis/. - Mermaid renders β every fenced
```mermaidblock parses (no missing class definitions, no orphan nodes, no >40-node graphs that overflow viewport on mobile). - Line-floor check β artifact length β₯ the per-artifact floor in
reference-quality-thresholds.json; shorter artifacts trigger Pass-2 rewrite, never a[truncated]note.