Contributing / 参与贡献
August 15, 2026 · View on GitHub
中文
感谢你测试 DSH Passive Memory。当前最需要的是可复核的行为反馈,而不是完整私人 对话或主观分数。
提交 Issue 前请:
- 确认版本、Harness commit、Node.js、模型和 recall mode;
- 用合成文本或脱敏摘录描述“期望想起什么”和“实际想起什么”;
- 说明问题发生在自动召回、L1 线索、邻域展开还是原始搜索;
- 移除姓名、联系方式、密钥、完整 Prompt、数据库与未公开文件路径;
- 可以提供内容无关的计数、工具调用顺序、耗时和错误类型。
代码改动应保持 L0 权威、L1 可重建、scope 严格隔离,并为新行为增加测试。 不要让召回消息或记忆工具输出重新进入 L0。
English
Thank you for testing DSH Passive Memory. Reproducible behavior reports are more useful than private transcripts or a single subjective score.
Before opening an issue:
- record the plugin version, Harness commit, Node.js version, model, and recall mode;
- describe expected and actual memory behavior with synthetic or redacted text;
- identify whether the failure occurred in passive recall, an L1 clue, neighborhood expansion, or raw search;
- remove names, credentials, complete private prompts, databases, and private paths;
- prefer content-free counts, tool order, timings, and error categories.
Code changes must preserve authoritative L0 evidence, rebuildable L1 views, and exact scope isolation. New behavior needs tests, and recall/tool projections must never be re-ingested into L0.