README.md
January 16, 2026 ยท View on GitHub

โจ News
- [2026.01.16] ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ We have released CoF-T2I: Video Models as Pure Visual Reasoners for Text-to-Image Generation, check out our ๐ Paper ยท ๐ Website.
๐ฏ Todo List
We are actively preparing to release the following:
- Paper & project page
- Training & inference code
- CoF-T2I model checkpoints & evaluation scripts
- CoF-Evol-Instruct dataset
๐๏ธ CoF-T2I
CoF-T2I brings Chain-of-Frame (CoF) reasoning from video generation into text-to-image generation via progressive visual refinement: intermediate frames serve as explicit reasoning steps, and the final frame is taken as the output image.
Visualization of the reasoning trajectories generated by CoF-T2I. The final output is shown in large, and intermediate frames are shown in small.
๐ฏ Contributions
-
๐ญ A novel generation paradigm: We propose CoF-T2I, a text-to-image model that repurposes a video foundation model as pure visual reasoner, generating images via a CoF reasoning process.
-
๐ A comprehensive dataset with scalable pipeline: We introduce CoF-Evol-Instruct, a 64K-scale dataset of progressive visual refinement trajectories, built with a scalable quality-aware pipeline.
-
๐ Competitive results with extensive validation: Our extensive experiments show that CoF-T2I substantially outperforms its video backbone and achieves competitive performance on challenging benchmarks, with additional validations confirming its substantial promise.
๐ Overview
Overview of CoF-T2I. CoF-T2I builds on a video generation backbone, reframing inference-time reasoning for T2I generation as a CoF refinement process.
๐ CoF-Evol-Instruct
We design a quality-aware construction pipeline and curate 64K reasoning trajectories, ensuring both sample-level diversity and frame-wise consistency.
๐ Quick Start (Coming Soon)
We are preparing the release of training, inference, and evaluation code.
๐ Key Results & ๐ผ๏ธ More Visualizations
Unfold to see our key results and more visualizations
๐ Key Results
1๏ธโฃ Performance comparison on GenEval
The best and the second best Overall scores are in bold and underlined, respectively.
| Model | Single Obj. | Two Obj. | Counting | Colors | Position | Color Attr. | Overall โ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Image Models | |||||||
| SDXL | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.39 | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.55 |
| SD3-Medium | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.89 | 0.33 | 0.60 | 0.74 |
| FLUX.1-dev | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 0.67 |
| Unified MLLMs | |||||||
| Janus-Pro-7B | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.80 |
| BLIP3-o 8B | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.84 |
| OmniGen2 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.80 |
| BAGEL | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.78 |
| BAGEL-Think | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| T2I-R1 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.53 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.79 |
| Video Models | |||||||
| Wan2.1-T2V-14B | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.18 | 0.31 | 0.55 |
| CoF-T2I (Ours) | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.86 |
2๏ธโฃ Performance comparison on Imagine-Bench
The best and the second best scores are in bold and underlined, respectively.
| Model | Attribute shift | Hybridization | Multi-Object | Spatiotemporal | Overall โ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Image Models | |||||
| SDXL | 4.420 | 4.930 | 4.500 | 6.320 | 4.970 |
| SD3-Medium | 5.140 | 6.300 | 6.070 | 5.910 | 5.780 |
| FLUX.1-dev | 5.680 | 6.380 | 5.240 | 7.130 | 6.060 |
| Unified MLLMs | |||||
| Janus-Pro-7B | 5.300 | 6.730 | 6.040 | 7.280 | 6.220 |
| BLIP3-o 8B | 5.800 | 7.060 | 6.440 | 7.080 | 6.510 |
| OmniGen2 | 5.280 | 6.290 | 6.310 | 7.450 | 6.220 |
| BAGEL | 5.370 | 6.500 | 6.410 | 6.930 | 6.200 |
| BAGEL-Think | 6.260 | 7.740 | 6.960 | 7.130 | 6.930 |
| T2I-R1 | 5.850 | 7.360 | 6.680 | 7.700 | 6.780 |
| Video Models | |||||
| Wan2.1-T2V-14B | 5.436 | 6.950 | 5.383 | 6.237 | 5.939 |
| CoF-T2I (Ours) | 6.969 | 8.070 | 7.797 | 7.287 | 7.468 |
๐ผ๏ธ More Visualizations
1๏ธโฃ Dataset Visualizations
Visualization of CoF-Evol-Instruct Dataset. We showcase the prompt and corresponding CoF trajectories in our data.
2๏ธโฃ Qualitative Comparison
Comparison of the Wan2.1-T2V (baseline), Bagel-Think, and CoF-T2I. CoF-T2I produces satisfying results with both high photorealistic quality and precise alignment with the prompt.
3๏ธโฃ Reasoning Trajectories
Complete reasoning trajectories of CoF-T2I, including the intermediate frames and the final output alongside their corresponding prompts.
4๏ธโฃ Step-wise Quality Evolution
Performance trend across reasoning steps on GenEval (left) and Imagine-Bench (right).
๐ซก Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the following open-source projects and research works:
๐งพ Citation
If you find our work useful, please consider citing:
@misc{tong2026coft2ivideomodelspure,
title={CoF-T2I: Video Models as Pure Visual Reasoners for Text-to-Image Generation},
author={Chengzhuo Tong and Mingkun Chang and Shenglong Zhang and Yuran Wang and Cheng Liang and Zhizheng Zhao and Ruichuan An and Bohan Zeng and Yang Shi and Yifan Dai and Ziming Zhao and Guanbin Li and Pengfei Wan and Yuanxing Zhang and Wentao Zhang},
year={2026},
eprint={2601.10061},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CV},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10061},
}
๐ท๏ธ License
This repository is released under the MIT license. See LICENSE for additional details.