純分析範本
September 19, 2026 · View on GitHub
🇹🇼 中文|🇬🇧 English below
純分析範本
先確認你真的需要這個資料夾:如果你的分析是在批評/延伸某一個具體的 suites/<slug>/ 或 translations/<slug>/,寫進那個條目自己的 report.md 就好,不要在這裡另開一份——見 CONTRIBUTING.md ③。這裡只放沒有單一既有條目可以掛的分析:直接評論核心判準軸本身、跨多個條目的整體觀察、或方法論層級的提醒。
這篇分析在講什麼
(一句話講清楚結論,不要賣關子——讀者要能一眼看出這篇值不值得往下讀)
依據哪些既有條目/證據
(列出你這篇分析建立在哪些 suites/、translations/ 條目或外部來源之上,附連結;純粹是個人推測、沒有任何條目佐證的內容,老實寫「這段是推測,還沒有資料支持」,不要包裝成結論)
分析/論述
(正文。跟本 repo 其他地方一樣:能標 🔬/📚/📖 的具體事實就標,分不清楚出處、純粹是你自己判斷的部分,明確標 💭,不要讓讀者分不出哪句是收據、哪句是你的意見)
標籤
💭(純分析/心得——如果內容大量引用第三方資料,在正文個別標註 📚/📖,但整篇的性質仍是我們自己的綜合判斷)
Pure-analysis template (English)
Check you actually need this folder first: if your analysis critiques or extends one specific suites/<slug>/ or translations/<slug>/, write it into that entry's own report.md instead — see CONTRIBUTING.md ③. This folder is only for analysis with no single existing entry to attach to: a direct critique of the core axis itself, an observation spanning multiple entries, or a methodology-level caution.
What this analysis says
(state the conclusion in one line, don't bury it — a reader should be able to tell at a glance whether it's worth reading further)
Which existing entries/evidence this builds on
(list which suites/, translations/ entries, or external sources this analysis is built on, with links; if part of it is pure speculation with no entry backing it, say so honestly — "this part is speculative, not yet evidenced" — don't dress it up as a finding)
Analysis
(the body. Same rule as everywhere else in this repo: tag concrete facts 🔬/📚/📖 where you can; anywhere the provenance is unclear or it's purely your own judgment, tag it 💭 explicitly, so a reader can always tell a receipt apart from your opinion)
Tag
💭 (pure analysis/write-up — if the body cites third-party material heavily, tag those specific claims 📚/📖 inline, but the piece as a whole is still our own synthesis)