SHOWCASE.md

March 19, 2026 Β· View on GitHub

πŸ† Generated Paper Showcase

From a one-line idea to a conference-ready paper β€” fully autonomous, zero human intervention.

23 StagesΒ  8 PapersΒ  54k LOCΒ  ~27h Runtime

1547+ papersΒ  50 figuresΒ  121 pagesΒ  291 refs


Below are eight papers generated entirely by AutoResearchClaw β€” each starting from nothing more than a topic sentence. The pipeline autonomously searched literature, designed experiments, wrote and executed code, generated figures, and produced NeurIPS-formatted LaTeX papers with verified references.

πŸ“Œ Two batches, eight domains β€” Batch A covers mathematics, statistics, biology, and numerical computing; Batch B covers NLP, reinforcement learning, computer vision, and knowledge distillation β€” demonstrating the pipeline's cross-domain generality.


πŸ”„ How It Works

πŸ’‘
Idea

➜

πŸ“š
Literature
300–470 papers

➜

πŸ§ͺ
Hypothesis
experiment design

➜

πŸ’»
Code
2K–15K lines

➜

πŸ”¬
Execute
sandbox + refine

➜

πŸ“
Write
review & audit

➜

πŸ“„
Paper
NeurIPS PDF

Each run traverses 23 autonomous stages with iterative self-healing, multi-agent peer review, and citation verification β€” no human in the loop.


πŸ“˜ Batch A Β Β·Β  Mathematics, Statistics & Sciences

Generated on Machine A Β Β·Β  4 papers across 4 non-ML domains


πŸ“„ Paper I Β Β·Β  Random Matrix Theory   math

Finite-Dimensional Corrections to the Marchenko–Pastur Distribution in Random Wishart Matrices

Paper I First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Systematically quantify pre-asymptotic, finite-N deviations of empirical eigenvalue densities from the Marchenko–Pastur law across N = 50 to 5,000, decomposing error into bulk vs. edge components and testing lightweight correction models.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature473 papers collected β†’ 26 cited
πŸ’» Code10,290 lines of Python
⏱️ Runtime~2 h 25 min
πŸ“Š Figures5 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages16 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Result

Produced a finite-N correction atlas showing convergence rates of spectral densities, with edge deviations persisting significantly longer than bulk errors β€” providing practical guidance for when the MP law is "close enough."

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” MPCX Architecture

MPCX Framework Diagram

Finite-dimensional correction pipeline: Wishart matrix generation β†’ empirical spectral density estimation β†’ MP baseline comparison β†’ bulk/edge error decomposition β†’ correction model fitting. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“„ Paper II Β Β·Β  Econometrics   stats

Monte Carlo Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Estimators Under Weak Instruments

Paper II First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Reframe the classical 2SLS / LIML / Fuller-k / JIVE comparison around decision-relevant risk surfaces, mapping finite-sample phase diagrams that show where each estimator is preferred under realistic weak-IV conditions.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature366 papers collected β†’ 41 cited
πŸ’» Code10,062 lines of Python
⏱️ Runtime~2 h 56 min
πŸ“Š Figures6 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages14 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Result

Generated estimator-switching phase diagrams revealing that Fuller-k dominates in specific small-n, many-instrument regions, while JIVE's bias reduction is systematically offset by variance inflation β€” providing actionable guidance for empirical researchers.

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” IVX Architecture

IVX Framework Diagram

Monte Carlo IV evaluation pipeline: DGP specification β†’ estimator suite (2SLS, LIML, Fuller-k, JIVE) β†’ finite-sample risk surfaces β†’ phase diagram construction. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“„ Paper III Β Β·Β  Epidemiological Modeling   bio

Structural Identifiability and Parameter Estimation in Compartmental Epidemic Models (SIR / SEIR)

Paper III First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Map the boundary between structural and practical identifiability in SIR vs. SEIR models across realistic observation regimes, and quantify when Fisher Information Matrix gives false confidence relative to profile likelihood.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature388 papers collected β†’ 29 cited
πŸ’» Code9,374 lines of Python
⏱️ Runtime~2 h 23 min
πŸ“Š Figures6 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages18 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Result

Demonstrated that parameterization and observer design choices affect identifiability diagnostics more strongly than the choice between SIR and SEIR structure β€” with FIM producing overconfident estimates in specific observation-limited regimes where profile likelihood correctly flags non-identifiability.

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” PRIM Architecture

PRIM Framework Diagram

PRIM benchmark workflow: synthetic outbreak generation (SIR/SEIR) β†’ parameter estimation β†’ profile likelihood vs. FIM diagnostics β†’ identifiability regime mapping. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“„ Paper IV Β Β·Β  Numerical Linear Algebra   computing

Comparative Analysis of Preconditioning Strategies for Krylov Subspace Methods on Sparse Linear Systems

Paper IV First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Go beyond "which preconditioner wins" β€” build a feature-conditioned decision map for ILU / Jacobi / SSOR / AMG with CG / GMRES / BiCGSTAB, stratified by sparsity-graph structure and matrix pathology under realistic setup-vs-solve cost budgets.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature320 papers collected β†’ 33 cited
πŸ’» Code14,557 lines of Python
⏱️ Runtime~2 h 30 min
πŸ“Š Figures4 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages16 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Result

Produced a setup-vs-solve tradeoff analysis showing that methods considered "best" under solve-time alone are often suboptimal under realistic memory and setup budgets β€” with AMG dominance limited to specific elliptic SPD matrix families.

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” Krylov Preconditioner Architecture

Krylov Preconditioner Framework Diagram

Feature-conditioned preconditioner evaluation: sparse matrix collection β†’ structural descriptor extraction β†’ solver–preconditioner grid (CG/GMRES/BiCGSTAB Γ— ILU/Jacobi/SSOR/AMG) β†’ setup-vs-solve tradeoff analysis β†’ decision map. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“™ Batch B Β Β·Β  Machine Learning & AI

Generated on Machine B Β Β·Β  NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada (48 GB) Β Β·Β  4 papers across 4 ML sub-fields


πŸ“„ Paper V Β Β·Β  Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning   NLP

GARD: Gradient-Spectral Rank Allocation for LoRA Fine-Tuning

Paper V First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Most LoRA configurations use a fixed, uniform rank across all layers. GARD proposes using the spectrum of layer-wise gradients β€” eigenvalues of gradient covariance β€” to dynamically allocate rank where it matters most, under a strict parameter budget.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature60 references cited (100% verified)
πŸ’» Code2,894 lines of Python (5 files)
⏱️ Runtime~50 min
πŸ“Š Figures7 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages17 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Contribution

A principled alternative to uniform rank allocation: GARD links intrinsic gradient dimensionality to low-rank adapter capacity, periodically updating ranks during training using smoothed spectra.

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” GARD Architecture

GARD Framework Diagram

Gradient spectral analysis β†’ layer-wise rank scoring β†’ dynamic rank allocation under budget constraint. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“„ Paper VI Β Β·Β  Reinforcement Learning   RL

LACE: Learned Abstractions for Count-Based Exploration in Sparse-Reward RL

Paper VI First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Count-based exploration in RL relies on state visitation counts, but raw state spaces are too large for effective counting. LACE designs online-learned, task-aware state abstractions optimized specifically for count-based exploration in sparse-reward environments.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature25 references cited (100% verified)
πŸ’» Code2,067 lines of Python (4 files)
🐳 Experiment32 min GPU sandbox execution
⏱️ Runtime~6.8 hrs total
πŸ“Š Figures6 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages11 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Result

DQN baseline achieves 356.7 mean reward in sparse-reward gridworld tasks. The paper analyzes the trade-off between abstraction compactness for counting and information sufficiency for downstream control.

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” LACE Architecture

LACE Framework Diagram

Learned state abstraction module integrated with count-based exploration in the DQN agent loop. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“„ Paper VII Β Β·Β  Efficient Vision Transformers   CV

FAME: Frequency-Aware Progressive Token Merging for Efficient ViT Inference

Paper VII First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Existing ViT token pruning methods reduce tokens based on attention or saliency without considering frequency content. FAME uses DCT/FFT-based spectral filters to distinguish high-frequency detail tokens from low-frequency background tokens, merging progressively across layers.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature40 references cited (100% verified)
πŸ’» Code2,873 lines of Python (5 files)
🐳 Experiment32 min GPU sandbox execution
⏱️ Runtime~3.3 hrs total
πŸ“Š Figures7 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages10 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Result

ViT-B/16 baseline: 56.54% accuracy (3 seeds). Detailed analysis of the accuracy-efficiency tradeoff and per-layer metric breakdowns for frequency-aware vs. similarity-based merging.

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” FAME Architecture

FAME Framework Diagram

Frequency-aware token merging applied progressively across ViT layers with DCT-based spectral filtering. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“„ Paper VIII Β Β·Β  Knowledge Distillation   KD

CRAFT: Contrastive Feature Alignment for Robust Distillation Under Distribution Shift

Paper VIII First Page

πŸ‘† Click to read the full paper

πŸ’‘ Idea

Standard knowledge distillation transfers teacher knowledge assuming train/test distributions match. CRAFT introduces reliability-aware contrastive feature alignment that aligns teacher-student features across clean and corrupted views, while suppressing fragile teacher directions via a de-alignment loss.

βš™οΈ Pipeline Journey

πŸ”— Stages23 stages + 2 refinement iterations
πŸ“š Literature37 references cited (97% verified)
πŸ’» Code2,231 lines of Python (4 files)
🐳 Experiment33 min GPU sandbox execution
⏱️ Runtime~5.8 hrs total
πŸ“Š Figures9 auto-generated charts
πŸ“‘ Pages19 pages (NeurIPS format)

🎯 Key Result

MethodClean AccRobust Acc
ERM (baseline)81.22%62.96%
LogitKD82.33%64.68%
AttentionKD82.08%65.95%
CRD68.03%50.57%

Attention-based feature KD improves robustness by +3 pts over ERM, while naive CRD degrades it by -12 pts β€” motivating CRAFT's reliability-aware design.

Read PDF

πŸ–ΌοΈ Auto-Generated Framework Diagram β€” CRAFT Architecture

CRAFT Framework Diagram

Reliability-aware contrastive feature alignment between teacher and student across clean and corrupted views, with de-alignment on fragile teacher directions. Entirely auto-generated by the FigureAgent subsystem.


πŸ“Š Aggregate Statistics

πŸ“‹ Metric I II III IV V VI VII VIII πŸ† Total
🏷️ Domain Math Stats Bio NumLA NLP RL CV KD 8 fields
πŸ’» Code (LOC) 10,290 10,062 9,374 14,557 2,894 2,067 2,873 2,231 54,348
⏱️ Pipeline Time 2h25m 2h56m 2h23m 2h30m 50m 6h48m 3h18m 5h48m ~27 hrs
πŸ”— References 26 41 29 33 60 25 40 37 291 cited
πŸ“Š Figures 5 6 6 4 7 6 7 9 50 figs
πŸ“‘ Pages 16 14 18 16 17 11 10 19 121 pages

πŸš€ Try It Yourself

Every paper above was generated by a single command:

researchclaw run --topic "Your research idea here" --auto-approve

BackΒ  GitHub