Learning Path: A Sequenced Curriculum for RAG Mastery
June 7, 2026 · View on GitHub
A sequenced curriculum for mastering RAG — from fundamentals to research-frontier architectures.
Three Learning Tracks
Choose your track based on your available time and interview target.
| Track | Time Budget | Recommended For | Where to Start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breadth-First | 1–2 weeks | Phone screens, quick prep, need to know all 12 types at high level | 00_overview/rag_taxonomy.md, then each file in 02_interview_bank/ Q1–Q3 only |
| Depth-First | 4 weeks | Technical interviews, system design rounds, deep expertise on 3–4 types | 01_concepts/ in full, then 02_interview_bank/ 01–04 in depth |
| Production-First | 3 weeks | Senior/staff interviews, operations focus, observability and failure modes | 00_overview/system_design_principles.md, cost analysis (Q11 across all files), evaluation/observability |
Week-by-Week Study Plan (4-Week Depth-First)
Week 1: Foundations
Goal: Understand the building blocks all RAG systems rest on.
| Day | Topic | Read | Questions to Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Embeddings | 01_concepts/embeddings.md full | Can you explain cosine similarity? What embedding model fails on domain-specific text? |
| 2–3 | Chunking Strategies | 01_concepts/chunking_strategies.md full | Why does chunk size matter? When do you use parent-child chunking? |
| 4 | Vector Databases | 01_concepts/vector_databases.md full | What's the difference between HNSW and IVF? When do you choose Qdrant vs. Pinecone? |
| 5 | Practice Q&A | Q1–Q3 from 02_interview_bank/01-naive-rag.md | Answer cold without notes. Practice explaining to a peer. |
Code Exercise: Build a minimal retrieval pipeline: embed a 100-document corpus, store in FAISS, retrieve top-5 for 10 test queries, measure recall. Write down chunk size and embedding model choice and why.
Week 2: Core Architectures
Goal: Master Naive, Advanced, Modular, and Corrective RAG. Understand the retrieval problem deeply.
| Day | Topic | Read | Questions to Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Retrieval Strategies | 01_concepts/retrieval_strategies.md full | What's RRF? When does hybrid retrieval beat dense? What is HyDE? |
| 2–3 | Reranking | 01_concepts/reranking.md full | Why use a cross-encoder after dense retrieval? What's the latency cost? |
| 4–5 | Naive + Advanced RAG Q&A | Q1–Q10 from 02_interview_bank/01-naive-rag.md and 02-advanced-rag.md | Answer all 20 questions cold. These are your baseline |
| 5 | Corrective RAG | 02_interview_bank/06-corrective-rag.md Q1–Q5 | How does validation change retrieval? When does correction help? |
Code Exercise: Implement RRF hybrid retrieval (BM25 + dense). Benchmark hybrid vs. pure dense on 10 test queries. Document the recall gain.
Week 3: Advanced & Specialized Architectures
Goal: Understand when to use Agentic, Self-RAG, Graph, Structured, Multimodal, and Long-Context RAG.
| Day | Topic | Read | Questions to Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Evaluation Metrics | 01_concepts/evaluation_metrics.md full | What does NDCG@5 mean? What is RAGAS faithfulness? |
| 2–3 | Agentic RAG | 02_interview_bank/04-agentic-rag.md Q1–Q8 | How does an agent decide to re-retrieve? What fails with agents? |
| 3–4 | Self-RAG + Graph RAG | 02_interview_bank/07-self-rag.md Q1–Q5, 05-graph-rag.md Q1–Q5 | Why does Self-RAG require fine-tuning? What does knowledge graph retrieval gain you? |
| 4–5 | Structured + Multimodal RAG | 02_interview_bank/12-structured-rag.md Q1–Q5, 09-multimodal-rag.md Q1–Q5 | When do you route to SQL vs. text? How do you embed images? |
| 5 | Long-Context RAG | 02_interview_bank/10-long-context-rag.md Q1–Q5 | What breaks with context windows >10K tokens? When is long-context better than retrieval? |
Code Exercise: Write a retrieval strategy selector: given a query, decide whether to use dense, hybrid, graph-based, or SQL-based retrieval. Justify each choice.
Week 4: System Design & Security
Goal: Integrate knowledge into production-grade systems. Understand cost, observability, and security.
| Day | Topic | Read | Questions to Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | System Design Principles | 00_overview/system_design_principles.md full | What are the five properties of a production RAG? How do you design for cost? |
| 2 | Security & Prompt Injection | 01_concepts/prompt_injection_risks.md full | What is indirect prompt injection? How do you mitigate it? |
| 3–4 | Cost & Observability Q&A | Q11 from each of 02_interview_bank/01–05.md (5 cost questions), Q12 from the same files (5 security questions) | Can you optimize cost while maintaining recall? Can you detect a prompt injection attack? |
| 4–5 | Adaptive RAG | 02_interview_bank/11-adaptive-rag.md Q1–Q10 | When does adaptive routing beat static retrieval? How do you implement routing? |
| 5 | Integration & Practice | Re-read 00_overview/rag_taxonomy.md and system_design_principles.md | Can you draw the canonical system design answer from memory? |
Code Exercise: Design a RAG system end-to-end: define the 5 properties, draw the pipeline, compute cost for 10K QPS, instrument for observability, mitigate prompt injection. Write as if you're explaining to a senior engineer.
Concept Dependency Graph
This DAG shows prerequisites for each concept. Follow the arrows: if you want to understand X, make sure you understand everything pointing to it first.
Embeddings ──┐
├──► Vector Databases ──┐
Chunking ────┤ ├──► Naive RAG ──┐
└──────────────────────►│ │
├──► Advanced RAG ──┐
Retrieval Strategies ───────────────►│ │
└──► Modular RAG ───┤
Reranking ──────────────────────────►│ │
└──► Corrective RAG │
Evaluation Metrics ──────────────────┤ │
├──► Agentic RAG ───┤
System Design Principles ────────────┤ ├──► System Design Round
├──► Self-RAG ──────┤
Prompt Injection Risks ──────────────┤ │
├──► Graph RAG ─────┤
│ │
├──► Structured RAG ┤
│ │
└──► Long-Context RAG┘
Note: No circular dependencies exist. This is a strict partial ordering — you can start at the top and work downward.
Depth Calibration by Interview Type
Different interview types test different depth. Use this to calibrate your study.
| Interview Type | Expected Depth | Which Files to Focus On | Time to Spend | Example Question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phone Screen (30–45 min) | Breadth (taxonomy) | 00_overview/rag_taxonomy.md, Q1–Q3 from each of 02_interview_bank/01–03.md | 3–5 hours | "What's the difference between Naive and Advanced RAG?" |
| Technical Round (60 min, coding) | Medium (mechanism + code) | 01_concepts/ (all), Q1–Q8 from 02_interview_bank/01–04.md | 1 week | "Implement hybrid retrieval with RRF" |
| System Design (60 min) | Deep (architecture + trade-offs) | 00_overview/system_design_principles.md, Q9–Q12 from all 02_interview_bank/ files | 2 weeks | "Design a RAG system for document search. Requirements: 10M docs, <300ms P95 latency." |
| ML Systems Design (90 min) | Deep + research (evaluation + feedback loops) | 01_concepts/evaluation_metrics.md, 02_interview_bank/07-self-rag.md, all Q11–Q12 | 2–3 weeks | "How would you build a self-improving RAG system?" |
| Take-Home Project (5–8 hours) | Deep + implementation | All 01_concepts/, all 02_interview_bank/ | Intensive week | "Build a RAG system for a domain-specific corpus. Measure and optimize retrieval quality." |
Self-Assessment Questions
Answer these without notes. If you get stuck, find the answer in the files and re-read that section. These questions span multiple files — forcing cross-topic synthesis.
-
Embeddings + Chunking: Your system retrieves documents but misses relevant ones. How do you diagnose whether it's an embedding problem or a chunking problem?
-
Vector DBs + Retrieval: You're evaluating Qdrant vs. FAISS. What's the trade-off? Which would you choose for a 100M vector corpus and why?
-
Retrieval + Reranking: Your dense retrieval has 40% recall@5, but after reranking, it's 42%. Is reranking worth the latency cost?
-
Evaluation + Agentic: You measure NDCG@5 = 0.7 and faithfulness = 0.85. What does this tell you about your Agentic RAG system?
-
Chunking + Reranking: Parent-child chunking vs. fixed-size chunking with reranking — which scales better and why?
-
Embeddings + Graph RAG: Your system uses both text embeddings and a knowledge graph. How do you choose which retrieval source to use for a given query?
-
System Design + Cost: At 10K QPS with OpenAI embedding and GPT-4, what's your primary cost center? How do you optimize?
-
Adaptive RAG + Evaluation: You build an Adaptive RAG that routes queries. How do you measure whether the router improves over Naive RAG?
-
Reranking + Prompt Injection: A reranker is supposed to filter out irrelevant documents. Can a reranker be tricked by prompt injection attacks?
-
Retrieval Strategies + Evaluation: You're choosing between BM25 and dense retrieval for a medical question-answering system. How do you decide? What metrics inform the choice?
-
Long-Context + System Design: With Claude's 200K context window, should you use retrieval or long-context RAG? What's the trade-off?
-
Self-RAG + Observability: Your Self-RAG system fine-tunes a model to improve. How do you monitor whether the fine-tuned model is actually better in production?
-
Prompt Injection + Agentic RAG: An agent retrieves a document that contains prompt injection. What happens? How do you prevent it?
-
Structured RAG + Evaluation: You route some queries to SQL and some to text retrieval. How do you evaluate the system as a whole (one metric across both paths)?
-
Graph RAG + Chunking: In Graph RAG, how do you chunk documents when building the knowledge graph? Does chunking strategy affect graph quality?
Resources Beyond This Repo
These resources fill gaps this repo intentionally leaves. Use them for context.
| Resource | Type | What It Covers | Why Use It |
|---|---|---|---|
| LlamaIndex Documentation | Code + Tutorials | Production patterns for ingestion, retrieval, evaluation | This repo is concept-heavy; LlamaIndex is implementation-heavy. Use together. |
| Langchain Handbook (DeepLearning.AI) | Course | End-to-end RAG systems with code | Complements the Q&A format with narrative tutorials. |
| BEIR Benchmark Leaderboard | Benchmark Dataset | Retrieval evaluation across 18 datasets | Test your understanding of retrieval metrics against real benchmarks. |
| OpenAI Prompt Injection Docs | Official Guidance | Prompt injection patterns and defenses | Official best practice; more current than papers. |
| Banerjee et al., "RAGAS: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation" (2023) | Paper | RAGAS framework in-depth | Deep dive if you want to implement custom evaluation. |
Recommended Study Order
If you're time-constrained, follow this priority order:
- Must-know (4 hours):
01_concepts/embeddings.md+01_concepts/chunking_strategies.md - Essential (6 hours):
01_concepts/vector_databases.md+01_concepts/retrieval_strategies.md - High-value (4 hours):
02_interview_bank/01-naive-rag.mdQ1–Q5 +02-advanced-rag.mdQ1–Q5 - Differentiator (4 hours):
00_overview/system_design_principles.md - Advanced (6 hours):
01_concepts/evaluation_metrics.md+01_concepts/reranking.md - Everything else: Research-frontier (Agentic, Self-RAG, Graph) and specialized (Multimodal, Long-Context) — nice-to-have for senior rounds