Core API Notes

April 29, 2026 ยท View on GitHub

coaction


coaction / core-api-notes

Core API Notes

create() Input Shapes

create() accepts either a single store factory or an object of slice factories. The object form becomes ambiguous when every enumerable value is a function, because it can mean either:

  • a plain store object that only exposes methods
  • a slices object where each property is a slice factory

For that reason, use sliceMode: 'single' or sliceMode: 'slices' explicitly for function maps.

Local/Main Stores vs Client Stores

Passing transport creates the main/shared store. Passing clientTransport or worker creates a client mirror of that shared store.

Client stores have two important differences:

  • store methods return promises because execution happens on the main store
  • direct setState() calls are rejected on the client; mutate through a store method instead

getState() Method Binding

Store methods and slice methods are rebound to the latest state object when they are invoked. This makes patterns like the following safe even when the method body relies on this:

const { increment } = store.getState();
increment();

The same rule applies to slices:

const { increment } = store.getState().counter;
increment();

External Adapter Boundaries

defineExternalStoreAdapter() is intended for whole-store adapters that bridge external state systems such as Redux, Zustand, Jotai, Pinia, MobX, or Valtio. createBinder() remains available as the compatibility name for existing adapters.

Binder-backed stores are not compatible with Coaction slices mode. If an external integration should live under a slice key, wrap the entire external store instead of mixing it into a slices object.

API Evolution Boundary

create() should be treated as a closed polymorphic surface, not an open-ended bucket for new semantics.

What that means in practice:

  • do not mix main-store and client-store transport settings in one call
  • do not pass multiple client transport sources in one call
  • prefer explicit helpers or createXxx variants for future expansion instead of new ambiguous overloads

The compatibility-only workerType options remain available, but they are not the preferred path for new API design.