Potato: The Portable Annotation Tool
July 27, 2026 · View on GitHub
Potato is a free, self-hosted annotation platform for NLP, Agentic, GenAI, and qualitative research. Annotate text, audio, video, images, documents, agent traces, and more — or run a full qualitative data analysis (QDA) workflow with a living codebook, memos, and cases. Configured entirely through YAML. No coding required.
Try the live demo on HuggingFace Spaces — no installation needed. More at www.potatoannotator.com.
Quick Start
pip install potato-annotation
# The examples/ folder ships with the source repo (see "run from source" below).
# After a PyPI install, clone the repo for the examples, or point `potato start`
# at your own config (see docs/quick-start.md).
potato start examples/classification/single-choice/config.yaml -p 8000
Or run from source (recommended to get the examples/):
git clone https://github.com/davidjurgens/potato.git
cd potato && pip install -r requirements.txt
python potato/flask_server.py start examples/classification/single-choice/config.yaml -p 8000
Open http://localhost:8000 and start annotating. Browse the examples/ directory for ready-to-use templates.
What Can You Annotate?
Potato handles the full spectrum of annotation tasks — from traditional NLP labeling to evaluating the latest AI agent systems, to interpretive qualitative analysis.
The tables below are a representative sample, not a complete list. Schemes and data types compose freely, custom layouts and raw HTML let you build interfaces beyond these, and new schema types can be added. If you don't see your task here, it's likely still possible.
Data Types
| Modality | Capabilities |
|---|---|
| Text | Classification, span labeling, entity linking, coreference, pairwise comparison (docs) |
| Agent Traces | Step-by-step evaluation of LLM agents, tool calls, ReAct chains, and multi-agent systems (docs) |
| Web Agents | Screenshot-based review with SVG click/scroll overlays, or live browsing with automatic trace recording (docs) |
| RAG Pipelines | Retrieval relevance, answer faithfulness, citation accuracy, hallucination detection |
| Audio | Waveform visualization, segment labeling, ELAN-style tiered annotation, and 21 transcript/subtitle formats read directly — Whisper, cloud ASR, SRT/VTT, YouTube captions, TextGrid/EAF (docs, transcripts) |
| Video | Frame-by-frame labeling, temporal segments, playback sync (docs) |
| Images | Bounding boxes, polygons, landmarks, classification (docs) |
| Dialogue | Turn-level annotation, conversation trees, interactive chat evaluation, and diarized transcripts synced to their audio (docs) |
| Documents | PDF, Word, Markdown, code, and spreadsheets with coordinate mapping (docs) |
Annotation Schemes
| Scheme | Use Case |
|---|---|
| Radio / Checkbox / Likert | Classification, multi-label, rating scales |
| Span annotation | NER, highlighting, hallucination marking |
| Pairwise comparison | A/B testing, best-worst scaling |
| Per-step ratings | Evaluate individual agent actions or dialogue turns |
| Free text | Open-ended responses with validation |
| Triage | Rapid accept/reject/skip curation (docs) |
| Conditional logic | Adaptive forms that respond to prior answers (docs) |
Agent & LLM Evaluation
Potato provides purpose-built tooling for evaluating AI agents at every level of granularity.
Trace Formats
Import traces from any major agent framework with the built-in converter:
python -m potato.trace_converter --input traces.json --input-format openai --output data.jsonl
Supported formats: OpenAI, Anthropic/Claude, ReAct, LangChain, LangFuse, WebArena, SWE-bench, OpenTelemetry, CrewAI/AutoGen/LangGraph, MCP, Aider, Claude Code, ATIF, SWE-Agent, and Web Agent. Auto-detection is available with --auto-detect.
Evaluation Levels
| Level | What You Annotate | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Trajectory | Overall task success, efficiency, safety | "Did the agent complete the task?" |
| Step | Individual action correctness, reasoning quality | Per-turn Likert ratings on each agent step |
| Span | Specific text segments within agent output | Highlight hallucinated claims, factual errors |
| Comparison | Side-by-side A/B agent evaluation | "Which agent performed better?" |
Web Agent Viewer
An interactive viewer for GUI agent traces — navigate step-by-step through screenshots with SVG overlays showing clicks, bounding boxes, mouse paths, and scroll actions. Annotators rate each step with inline controls while a filmstrip bar provides quick navigation.
Ready-to-Use Agent Examples
| Example | What It Evaluates |
|---|---|
| agent-trace-evaluation | Text agent traces with MAST error taxonomy + hallucination spans |
| visual-agent-evaluation | GUI agents with screenshot grounding accuracy |
| agent-comparison | Side-by-side A/B agent comparison |
| rag-evaluation | RAG retrieval relevance and citation accuracy |
| openai-evaluation | OpenAI Chat API traces with tool calls |
| anthropic-evaluation | Claude messages with tool_use blocks |
| swebench-evaluation | Coding agents with patch correctness ratings |
| multi-agent-evaluation | Multi-agent coordination (CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph) |
| web-agent-review | Pre-recorded web traces with step-by-step overlay viewer |
| web-agent-creation | Live web browsing with automatic trace recording |
Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA)
Potato isn't only for label-and-aggregate tasks — it also supports interpretive qualitative research, the kind of work done in tools like NVivo, ATLAS.ti, or MAXQDA, fully self-hosted and free.
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Living codebook | The codebook is an evolving markdown document of rules, definitions, examples, and rationales — not just a label list. Edit it in a full-page document view or inline while coding, with versioning, diff, and restore; semantic edits can re-flag affected excerpts for review (docs) |
| In-vivo coding | Create codes directly from a highlighted passage, in the participant's own words (example) |
| Memos | Attach analytic notes to excerpts, codes, or the whole project as your interpretation develops (docs) |
| Cases | Group instances into units of analysis — participants, interviews, documents, sites — for case-based comparison (docs) |
| Search | Full-text search across your corpus and annotations to find, revisit, and code recurring patterns (docs) |
| Codebook distillation | Turn the human-authored codebook into an LLM prompt for AI-assisted coding |
Enable it with qda_mode, which sensibly cascades these features on; see the QDA Mode guide and the runnable qda-mode-example.
AI-Powered Annotation
LLM Label Suggestions
Integrate any LLM provider to pre-annotate instances and suggest labels. Annotators review and correct — dramatically faster than labeling from scratch.
Supported backends: OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, vLLM, Gemini, HuggingFace, OpenRouter
Active Learning
Potato reorders your annotation queue based on model uncertainty so annotators label the most informative instances first. Supports uncertainty sampling, BADGE, BALD, diversity, and hybrid strategies (docs).
Solo Mode
A human-LLM collaborative workflow where the system learns from annotator feedback and progressively transitions to autonomous LLM labeling as agreement improves (docs).
Chat Assistant
An LLM-powered sidebar where annotators can ask questions about difficult instances. The AI provides guidance informed by your task description and annotation guidelines — helping annotators think through decisions without auto-labeling (docs).
Quality Control & Workflows
Quality Assurance
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Attention checks | Automatically inserted known-answer items to verify engagement |
| Gold standards | Track annotator accuracy against expert labels |
| Inter-annotator agreement | Krippendorff's alpha (general) and Cohen's kappa (step-level agent evaluation) |
| Training phase | Practice annotations with feedback before the real task |
| Behavioral tracking | Timing, click patterns, and annotation change history |
| Psychometrics | Live IRT (multiclass GLAD, Whitehill et al. 2009) fit as annotations arrive: per-item label posteriors, annotator ability with standard errors, item difficulty, and discrimination flags for codebook bugs — no gold labels, no LLM (docs) |
| Boundary probing | Counterfactual probes map each annotator's decision boundary; paraphrase-invariance flags inconsistency (docs) |
| Truth Serum | Surprisingly-popular scoring (Prelec et al., Nature 2017): gold-free verdicts that beat majority vote on hard items, plus annotator calibration (docs) |
| Paper Mode | python -m potato.paper config.yaml emits a compilable LaTeX dataset report — methods paragraphs, booktabs tables, IAA, limitations — ready to cut-paste (docs) |
| Think-Aloud Mode | Speak while you annotate: fully-local speech-to-text, verbatim rationale streams, labels committed by voice via rule-based phrase detection — no LLM (docs) |
Annotation Workflows
| Workflow | Description |
|---|---|
| Multi-annotator | Multiple annotators per item with overlap control and agreement metrics |
| Adjudication | Expert review of annotator disagreements to produce gold labels (docs) |
| Solo mode | Human-LLM collaboration with progressive automation (docs) |
| Crowdsourcing | Prolific and MTurk integration with platform-specific auth (docs) |
| Triage | Rapid accept/reject/skip for data curation (docs) |
| Multiplayer Rooms | Live shared sessions: norming (blind vote → reveal → discuss, with blind vs. post-discussion α), huddle (walk current disagreements together), and shadow (trainees watch the host annotate) (docs) |
| Pocket Mode | Annotate from your phone: installable PWA with a card-stack UI, one-tap labeling, and offline annotation that syncs on reconnect (docs) |
Continuous Evaluation Loop
Close the loop from production traces to graded, regression-gated evaluation:
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Capture | Instrument any agent with the @traceable tracing SDK, or POST traces to the ingestion webhook |
| Automate | Rules (filter → sample → actions) route incoming traces to queues, datasets, evaluators, or webhooks |
| Curate | Versioned datasets & experiments + semantic search/slices to find what to review |
| Evaluate | Programmatic evaluators (trajectory match, tool-use, LLM-judge, heuristics) + a side-by-side model arena |
| Gate | Run evals in pytest and fail CI on score-threshold regressions |
| Calibrate | LLM-judge ↔ human alignment with auto-calibration from human corrections; judges categorical, span, and free-text outputs |
Authentication & Deployment
Potato supports multiple authentication methods, from passwordless quick-start to enterprise SSO:
| Method | Use Case |
|---|---|
| In-memory | Local development, quick studies |
| Password + file persistence | Team annotation with shared credential files (docs) |
| Database | Production deployments with SQLite or PostgreSQL (docs) |
| OAuth / SSO | Google, GitHub, or institutional OIDC login (docs) |
| Clerk | Managed authentication via Clerk.com (docs) |
| Passwordless | Low-stakes tasks where ease of access matters (docs) |
Passwords are hashed with per-user PBKDF2-SHA256 salts. Admins can reset passwords via CLI (potato reset-password) or REST API. Self-service token-based reset is also available.
Example Projects
Ready-to-use templates organized by type in examples/:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Classification | Radio, checkbox, Likert, slider, pairwise comparison |
| Span | NER, span linking, coreference, entity linking |
| Agent Traces | LLM agents, web agents, RAG, multi-agent, code agents |
| Audio | Waveform annotation, classification, ELAN-style tiered |
| Video | Frame-level labeling, temporal segments |
| Image | Bounding boxes, PDF/document annotation |
| Advanced | Solo mode, adjudication, quality control, conditional logic |
| QDA | Qualitative analysis: living codebook, in-vivo coding, memos, cases |
| AI-Assisted | LLM suggestions, Ollama integration |
| Custom Layouts | Content moderation, dialogue QA, medical review |
Live Demos on HuggingFace
Try Potato in your browser — no installation. A growing catalog of one-click demo Spaces covers classification, span/NER, agent-trace evaluation, multimodal, QDA, and more:
- 🤗 Flagship demo — agent trace evaluation
- 📋 Full demo catalog & collection — every annotation type as a live Space
- 🚀 Deploy your own —
build_space.py+deploy_space.pyfrom a single manifest
Research Showcase
The Potato Showcase contains annotation projects from published research — sentiment analysis, dialogue evaluation, summarization, and more.
Documentation
Potato has two complementary doc sites: potatoannotator.com/docs for guides, tutorials, and higher-level walkthroughs, and Read the Docs for the complete, version-matched technical reference (every config option, the full HTTP API, and internals). The links below point to the guide pages.
For coding agents
If you point Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor at Potato, give it these generated, machine-checkable specs rather than prose — they are built from the running code, so they cannot drift from it.
| Artifact | What it gives you |
|---|---|
llms.txt | Curated index of the docs (llms.txt standard) |
llms-full.txt | Every documentation page in one file |
| Config JSON Schema | All 154 config keys, 56 annotation types, 23 display types — validates a config.yaml before the server runs |
| OpenAPI 3.1 spec | All 390 HTTP paths, with per-operation auth and config gating |
Every config in examples/ carries a # yaml-language-server: $schema=…
modeline, so editors validate it live. See
Machine-Readable Specs for editor
setup, CI validation, and jq recipes.
Development
# Run tests
pytest tests/ -v
# By category
pytest tests/unit/ -v # Unit tests (fast)
pytest tests/server/ -v # Integration tests
pytest tests/selenium/ -v # Browser tests
# With coverage
pytest --cov=potato --cov-report=html
See the Testing guide for which tier to write in, the test-file security rules, the annotation-persistence testing pattern, and the drift tests that keep the generated specs honest.
Support
- Issues: GitHub Issues
- Questions: jurgens@umich.edu
- Docs: potatoannotator.readthedocs.io
License
Potato is free software, licensed under the GNU General Public License v3.0 or later (GPLv3+). You are free to use, study, modify, and redistribute it — including for commercial purposes — provided that any distributed derivative works are also licensed under the GPLv3+ and made available with their source code. See the LICENSE file for the full terms.
Citation
If you use Potato in your research, please cite the Potato 2.0 paper (ACL 2026 System Demonstrations):
@inproceedings{jurgens-etal-2026-potato,
title = "Potato 2.0: A Comprehensive Annotation Platform with {AI}-in-the-Loop Support",
author = "Jurgens, David and
Chen, Michael and
Iyer, Lina",
editor = "Durrett, Greg and
Jian, Ping",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-demo.37/",
pages = "374--386",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-392-0",
}
To reference the original Potato release, cite the Potato 1.0 paper (EMNLP 2022 System Demonstrations):
@inproceedings{pei-etal-2022-potato,
title = "{POTATO}: The Portable Text Annotation Tool",
author = "Pei, Jiaxin and
Ananthasubramaniam, Aparna and
Wang, Xingyao and
Zhou, Naitian and
Dedeloudis, Apostolos and
Sargent, Jackson and
Jurgens, David",
editor = "Che, Wanxiang and
Shutova, Ekaterina",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations",
month = dec,
year = "2022",
address = "Abu Dhabi, UAE",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-demos.33/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-demos.33",
pages = "327--337",
}