evaluating-digital-work.md

Peer Review Guidelines

Ed. Alex Gil

• DH Commons: Review Guidelines
• Institut für Dokumentologie und Editorik: Kriterien für die Besprechung digitaler Editionen, Version 1.0
• Basic Principles for Modernist Networks Peer Review
• Towards a Peer Review of GeoHumanities Projects
• The NINES / NEH Summer Institutes: Evaluating Digital Scholarship
• 18thConnect: Peer Review
• RedHD: Humanidades Digitales – Evaluación
• AHRC: Peer review and evaluation of digital resources for the arts and humanities
• McClurken, Jeffrey. Revised Digital History Review Guidelines
• Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in Art and Architectural History
• Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University (ISAW), “Assessing Research at ISAW” (2012)
• Institute for the Study of the Ancient World New York University (ISAW), “Research at ISAW,”
• ADA Review Process
• UCLA Digital Humanities, “A Student Collaborators’ Bill of Rights,”
• The University of Arizona, “Promoting an Inclusive View of Scholarship,”

Tenure & Promotion Guidelines

• MLA: Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
• AHA: Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in History
• University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Promotion & Tenure Criteria for Assessing Digital Research in the Humanities
• Memorandum From The Emory College Humanities Council Regarding The Evaluation Of Digital Scholarship
• Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship (NINES), “Guidelines for Promotio n and Tenure Committees in Judging Digital Work” (2011)
• School of Art and Design, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), “Promotion and Tenure Process” (2012)

Readings

• Closing the Evaluation Gap. Special Issue of JDH. Vol. 1, No. 4 Fall 2012
• Schreibman, Susan, et al. Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Introduction
• Anderson, Steve and Tara McPherson. Engaging Digital Scholarship: Thoughts on Evaluating Multimedia Scholarship
• Rockwell, Geoffrey. On the Evaluation of Digital Media as Scholarship
• Nowviskie, Bethany. Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship
• McGann, Jerome. On Creating a Usable Future
• Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Peer Review, Judgment, and Reading
• Kristine M. Bartanen, “Digital Scholarship and the Tenure and Promotion Process,” The Academic Commons (July 24, 2014)
• Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, et al., “The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics,” Nature 520 (April 23, 2015): 429–31
• Todd Presner, “How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship” (2011)