base::Optional
March 16, 2018 ยท View on GitHub
base::Optional<T> is a container that might contain an instance of T.
[TOC]
History
base::Optionalbase:: namespace
instead of std::. Also, following Chromium coding style, the class is named
Optional instead of optional.
API description
For a deep API description, please have a look at std::optional
When initialized without a value, base::Optional<T> will be empty. When empty,
the operator bool will return false and value() should not be called. An
empty base::Optional<T> is equal to base::nullopt.
base::Optional<int> opt;
opt == true; // false
opt.value(); // illegal, will DCHECK
opt == base::nullopt; // true
To pass an empty optional argument to another function, use base::nullopt
where you would otherwise have used a nullptr:
OtherFunction(42, base::nullopt); // Supply an empty optional argument
To avoid calling value() when an base::Optional<T> is empty, instead of
doing checks, it is possible to use value_or() and pass a default value:
base::Optional<int> opt;
opt.value_or(42); // will return 42
It is possible to initialize a base::Optional<T> from its constructor and
operator= using T or another base::Optional<T>:
base::Optional<int> opt_1 = 1; // .value() == 1
base::Optional<int> opt_2 = base::Optional<int>(2); // .value() == 2
All basic operators should be available on base::Optional<T>: it is possible
to compare a base::Optional<T> with another or with a T or
base::nullopt.
base::Optional<int> opt_1;
base::Optional<int> opt_2 = 2;
opt_1 == opt_2; // false
opt_1 = 1;
opt_1 <= opt_2; // true
opt_1 == 1; // true
opt_1 == base::nullopt; // false
base::Optional<T> has a helper function base::make_optional<T&&>:
base::Optional<int> opt = base::make_optional<int>(GetMagicNumber());
Finally, base::Optional<T> is integrated with std::hash, using
std::hash<T> if it is not empty, a default value otherwise. .emplace() and
.swap() can be used as members functions and std::swap() will work with two
base::Optional<T> objects.
How is it implemented?
base::Optional<T> is implemented with a union with a T member. The object
doesn't behave like a pointer and doesn't do dynamic memory allocation. In
other words, it is guaranteed to have an object allocated when it is not empty.
When to use?
A very common use case is for classes and structures that have an object not always available, because it is early initialized or because the underlying data structure doesn't require it.
It is common to implement such patterns with dynamically allocated pointers,
nullptr representing the absence of value. Other approaches involve
std::pair<T, bool> where bool represents whether the object is actually
present.
It can also be used for simple types, for example when a structure wants to
represent whether the user or the underlying data structure has some value
unspecified, a base::Optional<int> would be easier to understand than a
special value representing the lack of it. For example, using -1 as the
undefined value when the expected value can't be negative.
When not to use?
It is recommended to not use base::Optional<T> as a function parameter as it
will force the callers to use base::Optional<T>. Instead, it is recommended to
keep using T* for arguments that can be omitted, with nullptr representing
no value. A helper, base::OptionalOrNullptr, is available in
stl_util.h
and can make it easier to convert base::Optional<T> to T*.
Furthermore, depending on T, MSVC might fail to compile code using
base::Optional<T> as a parameter because of memory alignment issues.