OpenEnv: compatibility inputs for environment replay

June 24, 2026 · View on GitHub

Twin: examples/sdk_framework_adapter_openenv_trace.py · emits agent-learning.run.v1 · offline, no credentials. A coding agent can complete this page from the frontmatter alone.

1. What you are testing

OpenEnv/Gymnasium shapes are compatibility inputs, not the product center. The kit's owned surface is environment replay: Agent Learning Kit is the primary runtime and release contract, and the bar is the executable environment_10x_robustness release gate. OpenEnv/Gymnasium-shaped traces remain compatibility evidence inside that bar — this page shows how such a trace enters the kit and what the kit does with it.

The twin, examples/sdk_framework_adapter_openenv_trace.py, builds a local LocalOpenEnvRunner whose export is an openenv_trace: an in-process runtime with local transport (requires_external_service: false), deterministic_reset: true, a discrete action space (approve_refund, probe_policy_drift), a dict observation space, and initial/current observations for a refund scenario. The adapter ingests that shape and carries it into a normal run artifact, where the same evaluation and regression machinery applies as for every other lane.

The failure class this addresses is unreplayable environment evidence: an environment-shaped trace that cannot be reset deterministically or replayed locally cannot anchor a regression. The second twin, examples/sdk_openenv_environment_optimization.py, runs the environment-replay optimizer over the same compatibility shape; the simulation-side walkthrough lives in examples/sdk_openenv_environment_simulation.py. The run manifest, examples/framework_openenv_manifest.json, targets the twin's runner directly (method: run, input_mode: dict) on the local_text engine: offline, deterministic, no provider keys.

2. Run it

CLI (the required_env key is CI metadata for this offline manifest — any placeholder value satisfies it):

AGENT_LEARNING_OPENENV_EXAMPLE_KEY=local-example \
agent-learn run examples/framework_openenv_manifest.json \
  --output artifacts/framework-openenv.json

SDK, same operation (export the same placeholder env first):

import asyncio
from fi.alk import simulate

result = asyncio.run(
    simulate.run_manifest_file("examples/framework_openenv_manifest.json")
)
assert result["kind"] == "agent-learning.run.v1"

3. What you built

Postcondition (machine-checkable — the same check the docs gate pattern uses):

python -c "import json; p=json.load(open('artifacts/framework-openenv.json')); assert p['kind']=='agent-learning.run.v1', p['kind']; print('ok')"

The artifact carries status, the simulated transcript, the evaluation report, and the ingested openenv_trace — action space, observation space, reset determinism flags, and the observation history. The environment shape is recorded as compatibility evidence inside a kit-native run artifact: replayable, diffable, and subject to the same gates as every other run.

4. When it fails

SymptomFirst-mile classDoctor check
vendored import failedinfraagent-learn doctorsummary.missing_engine_modules
missing required environment variable(s)config faultset the placeholder key shown above; agent-learn doctorsummary.public_boundary_passed confirms the install surface
trace lacks deterministic_reset or claims an external servicebehavior regressionre-run the twin and compare the openenv_trace flags — replayability is the contract

5. Prove it / keep it

The trace twin is admitted by the framework_environment_replay_adapter_readiness release gate and the optimizer twin by environment_replay_optimizer_readiness; the lane's overall bar is the executable environment_10x_robustness release gate. Every agent-learn release-check re-executes these paths — the page stays true or the release fails. To keep your own environment evidence honest, promote the run artifact into a regression baseline with the baseline / promote-to-regression / compare command family: the compatibility input is the entry point, and the replayable kit artifact is what you maintain. The reader's job here is maintenance of a living proof, not a one-off demo.