Neural-Decision-Forests
May 6, 2019 · View on GitHub
An implementation of the Deep Neural Decision Forests(dNDF) in PyTorch.

Features
- Two stage optimization as in the original paper Deep Neural Decision Forests (fix the neural network and optimize and then optimize with the class probability distribution in each leaf node fixed )
- Jointly training and proposed by chrischoy in his work Fully Differentiable Deep Neural Decision Forest
- Shallow Neural Decision Forest (sNDF)
- Deep Neural Decision Forest (dNDF)
Datasets
MNIST, UCI_Adult, UCI_Letter and UCI_Yeast datasets are available. For datasets other than MNIST, you need to go to corresponding directory and run the get_data.sh script.
Requirements
- Python 3.x
- PyTorch >= 1.0.0
- numpy
- sklearn
Usage
python train.py --ARG=VALUE
in the case of training the sNDF on MNIST with alternating optimization, the command is like
python train.py -dataset mnist -n_class 10 -gpuid 0 -n_tree 80 -tree_depth 10 -batch_size 1000 -epochs 100
Results
Not spending much time on picking hyperparameters and without bells and whistles, I got the accuracy results(obtained by training and seperately) as follows:
| Dataset | sNDF | dNDF |
|---|---|---|
| MNIST | 0.9794 | 0.9963 |
| UCI_Adult | 0.8558 | NA |
| UCI_Letter | 0.9507 | NA |
| UCI_Yeast | 0.6031 | NA |
By adding the nonlinearity in the routing function, the accuraries can reach 0.6502 and 0.9753 respectively on the UCI_Yeast and UCI_Letter.
Note
Some people may experience the 'loss is NaN' situation which could be caused by the output probability being zero. Please make sure you have normalized your data and used a large enough tree size and depth. In the case that you want to stick with your tree setting, a workaround could be to clamp the output value.