Data Science // Evaluation Parameters
September 14, 2016 Ā· View on GitHub
This is an evaluation guideline/documentation for data science submissions, where candidate must have worked on functional prototype, and would have visualisations, data points and possible code to back the analsis/findings.
Sample Splitup/Breakdown:
- Code : 15
- Graphs/Visualization/Maps : 10
- Usability : 10
Code
- Functionality and efficiency of the code and a choosen method (i.e. Python, R, Tableau, SAS, Microsoft BI, etc.)
- If the solution covers valid ternds, data points and/or statistical analysis on given problem/dataset
- Relevance of data points and produced output w.r.t. data analysis, processing, probability and statistics
Graphs/Visualization/Charts/Maps
- Use of sane and relevant Graph/Chart (Pareto/Bar, Pie/Circle, Histogram, Dot Plot, Scatter, Line, Cosmographs, Area, Waterfall, Radar, Bubble, etc)
- Elaborative self-explanatory design
- Use of Maps/Visualization (Comparisons, Proportions, Relationships, Hierarchy, Distribution, Movement/Flow, Pattern, Geographical, Vector, Heat, etc) whereever required
Usability (Findings/Impact/Validation)
-
How creative is the finding from the analytical point of view; and is it what we've asked for, is it more than what we've asked for; and other supporting deliverables submitted by the candidate
-
Validation of user submitted findings with existing answers set by problem setter/data scientist
-
Use of cloud providers, available resources and/or delivering more than what has been asked
-
Extra efforts/Uniqueness/creativity in given submission(s)
-
Sample solution: data-science-sample-answer
ā Note: This is raw guideline, and can be altered/customized as per the requirement and mutual discussion between Client and Evaluation Team.