Compliance

March 6, 2026 · View on GitHub

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of Enterprise_Knowledge_Gov.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

Guardrails and fix patterns for aligning enterprise knowledge management with legal, regulatory, and internal compliance requirements. Use this page when retrieval, storage, or reasoning drifts into non-compliant outputs even though the raw system looks healthy.


When to use this page

  • Retrieved snippets contain PII or sensitive records without redaction.
  • AI answers include restricted regulatory clauses without context.
  • Citations point to outdated compliance frameworks (e.g., GDPR 2016 vs 2021).
  • Access logs show gaps in provenance or audit trails.
  • External connectors sync content that violates retention policy.

Core acceptance targets

  • ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 within compliant scope.
  • Coverage ≥ 0.70 for allowed data, <0.05 for redacted or forbidden scopes.
  • λ convergent across three paraphrases and two seeds.
  • Every snippet carries compliance_tag, retention_scope, and audit_hash.

Typical compliance problems → exact fix

SymptomLikely causeOpen this
Leaked PII (emails, phone numbers)No compliance redaction contractdata-contracts.md, retrieval-traceability.md
Citations reference outdated law textMissing version control on KBchunking-checklist.md
Audit trail gapsIndex or connector does not log hashesbootstrap-ordering.md
Over-redaction (useful data removed)Regex-only redactors collapse semanticslogic-collapse.md

Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Check ΔS against compliant anchor text.
  2. Validate snippet contracts: enforce {snippet_id, compliance_tag, retention_scope, audit_hash}.
  3. Rebuild compliance filter: replace regex-only redaction with semantic filters.
  4. Re-index with version locks for regulatory text.
  5. Verify λ stability across paraphrases within compliant sections only.

Copy-paste schema (YAML)

snippet_id: "KB-98231"
section_id: "SEC-77"
compliance_tag: "gdpr_2021"
retention_scope: "7_years"
audit_hash: "sha256:..."
text: "..."

Escalate when

  • ΔS ≥ 0.60 persists after re-index and contract rebuild.
  • Sensitive snippets reappear across paraphrases.
  • Legal team confirms regulatory mismatch.

Escalation path: rebuild with eval_rag_precision_recall.md and audit via retrieval-traceability.md.


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads

ToolLink3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDFEngine Paper1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY +
TXT OS (plain-text OS)TXTOS.txt1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

LayerPageWhat it’s for
⭐ ProofWFGY Recognition MapExternal citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
⚙️ EngineWFGY 1.0Original PDF tension engine and early logic sketch (legacy reference)
⚙️ EngineWFGY 2.0Production tension kernel for RAG and agent systems
⚙️ EngineWFGY 3.0TXT based Singularity tension engine (131 S class set)
🗺️ MapProblem Map 1.0Flagship 16 problem RAG failure taxonomy and fix map
🗺️ MapProblem Map 2.0Global Debug Card for RAG and agent pipeline diagnosis
🗺️ MapProblem Map 3.0Global AI troubleshooting atlas and failure pattern map
🧰 AppTXT OS.txt semantic OS with fast bootstrap
🧰 AppBlah Blah BlahAbstract and paradox Q&A built on TXT OS
🧰 AppBlur Blur BlurText to image generation with semantic control
🏡 OnboardingStarter VillageGuided entry point for new users

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.
GitHub Repo stars