Regulatory Alignment

March 6, 2026 · View on GitHub

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of Governance.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

This page defines how to align AI pipelines with existing laws, sector regulations, and compliance regimes.
Most AI failures at scale are not purely technical but compliance drift — your pipeline silently breaks GDPR, HIPAA, or copyright law because logging or schema fences were never enforced.


When to use this page

  • Your system must prove compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, or EU AI Act.
  • Clients demand explainable outputs and data provenance.
  • Auditors request reproducibility and risk registers.
  • You operate in finance, healthcare, or government sectors with strict controls.

Acceptance targets

  • 100% of data sources have a license_id and jurisdiction field.
  • Provenance chain covers ingestion → embedding → retrieval → generation.
  • Risk register includes bias, privacy, and IP risks with owner assignment.
  • Queries and outputs auditable within 5 minutes.
  • Alignment tests run weekly against updated compliance checklists.

Common failures → exact fixes

SymptomLikely causeOpen this
Data from EU not separated or anonymizedmissing residency fencedata_residency.md
Private health data leaks in logsno PHI redactionprivacy_and_pii_edges.md
Citations omit license or sourceingestion lacks rightslicense_and_dataset_rights.md
Retrieval answers drift from contractschema not enforceddata-contracts.md
Bias audit fails on specific cohortsno structured probeseval_playbook.md

Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Residency + anonymization
    Partition datasets by region. Strip identifiers.

  2. Provenance chain
    Log license_id, jurisdiction, ingest_date, index_hash.

  3. Bias + privacy probes
    Weekly run λ stability tests across demographic variants.

  4. Risk register
    Maintain an owner, severity, and mitigation plan per risk.

  5. Alignment replay
    Prove a query followed rules by replaying citations and logs.


Minimal compliance checklist

  • All ingestion jobs include license_id and jurisdiction.
  • GDPR/CCPA consent tracked in logs.
  • Health/finance data use sector schemas.
  • Bias probes run weekly, logged with ΔS and λ.
  • Audit replay tested monthly with compliance team.

🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

ToolLink3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDFEngine Paper1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS)TXTOS.txt1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

LayerPageWhat it’s for
⭐ ProofWFGY Recognition MapExternal citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
⚙️ EngineWFGY 1.0Original PDF tension engine and early logic sketch (legacy reference)
⚙️ EngineWFGY 2.0Production tension kernel for RAG and agent systems
⚙️ EngineWFGY 3.0TXT based Singularity tension engine (131 S class set)
🗺️ MapProblem Map 1.0Flagship 16 problem RAG failure taxonomy and fix map
🗺️ MapProblem Map 2.0Global Debug Card for RAG and agent pipeline diagnosis
🗺️ MapProblem Map 3.0Global AI troubleshooting atlas and failure pattern map
🧰 AppTXT OS.txt semantic OS with fast bootstrap
🧰 AppBlah Blah BlahAbstract and paradox Q&A built on TXT OS
🧰 AppBlur Blur BlurText to image generation with semantic control
🏡 OnboardingStarter VillageGuided entry point for new users

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.
GitHub Repo stars

要我繼續幫你生成嗎?