Architecture Guide
January 12, 2026 · View on GitHub
Table of Contents
- What is the Data Modelling SDK?
- Project Decisions
- When to Use the SDK
- Architecture Overview
- Design Principles
- Component Architecture
- Storage Architecture
- Database Architecture
- Data Pipeline Architecture
- File Organization
- Integration Patterns
- Use Cases
What is the Data Modelling SDK?
The Data Modelling SDK is a Rust library that provides unified interfaces for data modeling operations across multiple platforms. It serves as the foundation for data governance, schema management, and data contract operations in modern data platforms.
Core Purpose
The SDK enables:
- Multi-format Support: Import from and export to various data contract formats (ODCS, ODCL, SQL, JSON Schema, AVRO, Protobuf, CADS, ODPS, BPMN, DMN, OpenAPI)
- Cross-platform Compatibility: Works seamlessly in native applications, web applications (WASM), and API backends
- Domain Organization: Organize data contracts, compute assets, and data products within business domains
- Validation & Governance: Validate schemas, detect conflicts, and enforce data governance rules
- Storage Abstraction: Abstract storage operations across different environments (file system, browser storage, HTTP API)
Key Characteristics
- Language: Rust (Edition 2024)
- License: MIT
- Platform Support: Native (Rust), Web (WASM), API (HTTP)
- Primary Format: ODCS v3.1.0 (Open Data Contract Standard)
- Architecture: Modular, trait-based, feature-gated
Project Decisions
1. Rust as the Foundation
Decision: Build the SDK in Rust
Rationale:
- Performance: Rust provides near-native performance with memory safety
- Cross-platform: Single codebase compiles to native binaries and WASM
- Type Safety: Strong type system prevents common errors
- Ecosystem: Excellent serialization, async, and web support
- WASM Support: First-class WASM compilation enables web deployment
Trade-offs:
- Learning curve for teams unfamiliar with Rust
- Longer compile times compared to interpreted languages
- Mitigated by excellent tooling and documentation
2. Storage Backend Abstraction
Decision: Abstract storage operations behind a trait (StorageBackend)
Rationale:
- Platform Independence: Same code works on file system, browser storage, and HTTP API
- Testability: Easy to mock storage for testing
- Flexibility: Applications can choose storage backend based on environment
- Future-proof: Easy to add new storage backends (S3, Azure Blob, etc.)
Implementation:
#[async_trait(?Send)]
pub trait StorageBackend: Send + Sync {
async fn read_file(&self, path: &str) -> Result<Vec<u8>, StorageError>;
async fn write_file(&self, path: &str, content: &[u8]) -> Result<(), StorageError>;
// ... more operations
}
3. ODCS as Primary Format
Decision: Use ODCS v3.1.0 as the primary internal format
Rationale:
- Comprehensive: ODCS provides the most complete metadata model
- Standard: Industry-standard format with broad adoption
- Extensible: Supports custom properties and extensions
- Field Preservation: Maintains all metadata during conversions
Trade-offs:
- More verbose than simpler formats
- Requires conversion layer for other formats
- Mitigated by universal converter and format-specific exporters
4. Domain-Based File Organization
Decision: Organize files by business domain
Rationale:
- Logical Grouping: Related assets (tables, products, compute) grouped together
- Scalability: Easy to manage large numbers of assets
- Ownership: Clear ownership boundaries per domain
- Version Control: Better Git history and collaboration
Structure (Flat File Naming Convention):
workspace/
├── workspace.yaml # Workspace metadata with assets and relationships
├── myworkspace_domain1_table1.odcs.yaml # Data contracts
├── myworkspace_domain1_product1.odps.yaml # Data products
└── myworkspace_domain1_model1.cads.yaml # Compute assets
Files follow the pattern: {workspace}_{domain}_{system}_{resource}.{type}.yaml
5. Feature-Gated Functionality
Decision: Gate optional functionality behind Cargo features
Rationale:
- Minimal Dependencies: Applications only include what they need
- WASM Compatibility: Some features (file system, Git) don't work in WASM
- Build Performance: Faster builds with fewer dependencies
- Binary Size: Smaller binaries for web deployment
Features:
default: API backend (HTTP)native-fs: File system operationswasm: Browser storage (IndexedDB/localStorage)git: Git operationspng-export: PNG diagram generationdatabricks-dialect: Databricks SQL supportdatabase: Database backend support (DuckDB/PostgreSQL)duckdb-backend: DuckDB embedded databasepostgres-backend: PostgreSQL databasestaging: Data staging with progress reportings3: AWS S3 ingestion supportdatabricks: Databricks Unity Catalog Volumes ingestioniceberg: Apache Iceberg lakehouse storagecli-full: Full CLI with all features including database support
6. UUID Strategy
Decision: Use UUIDv5 (deterministic) for model/table IDs
Rationale:
- Deterministic: Same inputs produce same ID (important for WASM without RNG)
- Collision-resistant: Very low probability of collisions
- Reproducible: Same model always gets same ID
- No Random Number Generation: Works in constrained environments
Trade-offs:
- Less privacy-friendly than random UUIDs
- Requires namespace and name for generation
- Acceptable for internal model IDs
7. Async/Await Architecture
Decision: Use async traits for storage operations
Rationale:
- Non-blocking: Better performance for I/O operations
- WASM Compatibility: Browser APIs are async
- Consistency: Same API across all platforms
- Future-proof: Aligns with Rust async ecosystem
Trade-offs:
- More complex than synchronous APIs
- Requires async runtime (Tokio for native, WASM runtime for web)
- Mitigated by excellent async/await syntax
8. Enhanced Tag Support
Decision: Support three tag formats (Simple, Pair, List)
Rationale:
- Flexibility: Supports various tagging strategies
- Backward Compatible: Simple tags work with existing systems
- Rich Metadata: Pair and List tags enable structured metadata
- Auto-detection: Automatically detects tag format during parsing
Formats:
- Simple:
"finance"- Single word tags - Pair:
"Environment:Dev"- Key-value pairs - List:
"SecondaryDomains: [XXXXX, PPPP]"- Key with multiple values
9. Consistent camelCase Serialization
Decision: Use camelCase for all JSON/YAML serialization
Rationale:
- ODCS Alignment: Matches ODCS format conventions
- Consistency: Same format across all models and schemas
- Frontend Friendly: Common convention for JavaScript/TypeScript APIs
- Standard Practice: Widely adopted in JSON APIs
Implementation:
- All structs use
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] - Enum variants serialize as camelCase (e.g.,
oneToMany,sourceToTarget) - Field names:
sourceTableId,targetCardinality,flowDirection, etc.
10. Crow's Feet Notation for Cardinality
Decision: Support standard crow's feet notation for endpoint cardinality
Rationale:
- Industry Standard: Widely recognized ERD notation
- Precision: More precise than simple OneToMany/ManyToMany
- Data Modeling: Essential for proper data flow diagrams
- Bi-directional: Supports asymmetric cardinality at each endpoint
Cardinality Values:
zeroOrOne(0..1): Optional singleexactlyOne(1..1): Required singlezeroOrMany(0..*): Optional multipleoneOrMany(1..*): Required multiple
Flow Directions:
sourceToTarget: Unidirectional from sourcetargetToSource: Unidirectional from targetbidirectional: Data flows both ways
When to Use the SDK
✅ Use the SDK When:
-
Building Data Governance Tools
- Data catalog applications
- Schema registry systems
- Data contract management platforms
- Data lineage tools
-
Cross-platform Applications
- Desktop applications (native)
- Web applications (WASM)
- Mobile applications (via API backend)
- CLI tools
-
Multi-format Support Required
- Need to import from multiple formats (SQL, JSON Schema, AVRO, etc.)
- Need to export to multiple formats
- Format conversion workflows
-
Domain-Driven Data Organization
- Organizing data by business domains
- Managing data products
- Tracking compute assets (AI/ML models, applications)
-
Validation & Quality Assurance
- Schema validation
- Conflict detection
- Circular dependency detection
- Naming convention enforcement
-
Storage Abstraction Needed
- Applications that need to work across different storage backends
- Offline-first applications (browser storage)
- Cloud-native applications (API backend)
❌ Don't Use the SDK When:
-
Simple Single-format Use Cases
- If you only need to work with one format and don't need conversion
- Consider format-specific libraries instead
-
Non-Rust Applications
- The SDK is Rust-only
- For other languages, consider the HTTP API backend or WASM bindings
-
Real-time Streaming
- The SDK focuses on batch operations
- Not designed for streaming data processing
-
Direct Database Operations
- The SDK works with schema definitions, not live databases
- Use database drivers for direct database access
Architecture Overview
High-Level Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Application Layer │
│ (Native App / Web App / API Server / CLI Tool) │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Data Modelling SDK │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Import │ │ Export │ │ Convert │ │
│ │ (Formats) │ │ (Formats) │ │ (Universal) │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Models │ │ Validation │ │ Domain │ │
│ │ (Core) │ │ (Rules) │ │ (Org) │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Storage Backend Abstraction │ │
│ │ (Trait-based, platform-agnostic) │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ File System │ │ Browser │ │ HTTP API │
│ Backend │ │ Backend │ │ Backend │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
Component Layers
- Application Layer: Your application code
- SDK Public API: High-level operations (import, export, validation)
- Core Models: Data structures (Table, Column, Domain, etc.)
- Storage Abstraction: Platform-independent storage operations
- Platform Implementations: Specific storage backends
Design Principles
1. Platform Independence
The SDK abstracts platform-specific operations behind traits, enabling the same code to run on:
- Native: File system operations via Tokio
- Web: Browser storage (IndexedDB/localStorage) via WASM
- API: HTTP operations via Reqwest
2. Format Agnosticism
The SDK supports multiple formats but maintains ODCS as the canonical internal format:
- Import: Convert any format → ODCS models
- Export: Convert ODCS models → any format
- Universal Converter: Direct format-to-format conversion
3. Domain-Driven Organization
Files and models are organized by business domain:
- Domain: Top-level container for related assets
- Systems: Physical infrastructure (Kafka, databases, etc.)
- ODCS Nodes: Data contracts (tables)
- CADS Nodes: Compute assets (AI/ML models, applications)
- ODPS Products: Data products linking multiple contracts
4. Format Compatibility
The SDK maintains format compatibility:
- ODCL v1.2.1 format supported (last version)
- Migration utilities for DataFlow → Domain
- Flat file naming convention for all assets
5. Extensibility
The SDK is designed for extension:
- Custom Properties: All models support custom metadata
- Feature Flags: Optional functionality gated behind features
- Trait-based: Easy to add new storage backends or exporters
6. Validation First
Validation is built into the core:
- Input Validation: Table/column names, UUIDs
- Schema Validation: Naming conflicts, circular dependencies
- Format Validation: JSON Schema validation against official schemas
Component Architecture
Core Components
1. Models (src/models/)
Core data structures representing data contracts and domain organization:
Table: Data contract with columns, metadata, relationshipsColumn: Column definition with type, constraints, quality rulesRelationship: Relationship between tablesDomain: Business domain containerSystem: Physical infrastructure entityCADSAsset: Compute asset (AI/ML model, application)ODPSDataProduct: Data product linking contractsDataModel: Container for tables, relationships, domains
2. Import (src/import/)
Format-specific importers converting external formats to SDK models:
ODCSImporter: ODCS v3.1.0 (primary format)ODCLImporter: ODCL v1.2.1 (legacy, via ODCSImporter)CADSImporter: CADS v1.0 (compute assets, supports BPMN/DMN/OpenAPI references)ODPSImporter: ODPS (data products)BPMNImporter: BPMN 2.0 XML (process models, requiresbpmnfeature)DMNImporter: DMN 1.3 XML (decision models, requiresdmnfeature)OpenAPIImporter: OpenAPI 3.1.1 YAML/JSON (API specs, requiresopenapifeature)SQLImporter: SQL DDL parsingJSONSchemaImporter: JSON Schema conversionAvroImporter: AVRO schema conversionProtobufImporter: Protobuf .proto parsing
3. Export (src/export/)
Format-specific exporters converting SDK models to external formats:
ODCSExporter: ODCS v3.1.0 exportODCLExporter: ODCL v1.2.1 export (legacy)CADSExporter: CADS v1.0 export (supports BPMN/DMN/OpenAPI references)ODPSExporter: ODPS exportBPMNExporter: BPMN 2.0 XML export (requiresbpmnfeature)DMNExporter: DMN 1.3 XML export (requiresdmnfeature)OpenAPIExporter: OpenAPI 3.1.1 YAML/JSON export with format conversion (requiresopenapifeature)SQLExporter: SQL DDL generationJSONSchemaExporter: JSON Schema generationAvroExporter: AVRO schema generationProtobufExporter: Protobuf .proto generation
4. Convert (src/convert/)
Universal format conversion:
convert_to_odcs(): Convert any format → ODCS YAMLauto_detect_format(): Detect input format automaticallymigrate_dataflow_to_domain(): Migrate legacy DataFlow → Domain
5. Validation (src/validation/)
Validation logic:
TableValidator: Table name validation, conflict detectionRelationshipValidator: Circular dependency detectionInputValidator: Input sanitization and validation
6. Model Management (src/model/)
Loading and saving models:
ModelLoader: Load models from storageModelSaver: Save models to storageApiModelLoader: Load via HTTP API
7. Storage (src/storage/)
Storage backend abstraction:
StorageBackend: Trait defining storage operationsFileSystemStorageBackend: Native file system (feature-gated)BrowserStorageBackend: Browser storage (WASM, feature-gated)ApiStorageBackend: HTTP API (default)
8. Staging (src/staging/) - Feature: staging
Data staging and ingestion layer using DuckDB:
StagingDatabase: DuckDB-backed storage for staged JSON dataBatchTracker: Resume-capable batch tracking with metadataJsonIngester: High-performance JSON file ingestion (glob patterns, partitioning)QueryEngine: SQL query interface for staged dataSchemaExporter: Export staged data to various formatsIngestProgress: Real-time progress reporting with indicatif (files, records, bytes)InferenceProgress: Progress bar for schema inference operationsSpinner: Simple spinner for indeterminate operationsS3Ingester: AWS S3 ingestion with streaming download (feature:s3)UnityVolumeIngester: Databricks Unity Catalog Volumes ingestion (feature:databricks)SecureCredentials: Credential wrapper preventing accidental loggingredact_secrets_in_string(): Regex-based secret redaction for logs
Key Features:
- Stage raw JSON files before schema inference
- Partition-based organization for large datasets
- Resume interrupted ingestion from last successful batch
- Query staged data with SQL before committing to schema
- Real-time progress reporting with throughput metrics
- S3 ingestion with AWS SDK for Rust (streaming, parallel)
- Databricks Unity Catalog Volumes ingestion via REST API
- Secure credential handling with Display trait redaction
- Automatic secret redaction in error messages and logs
9. Inference (src/inference/) - Feature: inference
Automatic schema inference from staged data:
SchemaInferer: Analyze JSON data to infer column typesTypeDetector: Detect 18+ semantic types (email, UUID, URL, phone, etc.)FormatDetector: Identify date/time formats, patternsStatisticsCollector: Gather column statistics (nullability, uniqueness, cardinality)ConflictResolver: Handle type conflicts across recordsConstraintInferer: Infer constraints (NOT NULL, UNIQUE, ranges)SchemaRefiner: LLM-enhanced schema refinement
Type Detection Hierarchy:
Semantic Types (highest priority)
├── uuid, email, url, phone, ip_address
├── currency, percentage, credit_card
├── iso_country, iso_language, iso_currency
└── date, time, datetime, timestamp
Structural Types
├── boolean, integer, float, decimal
├── string, text, json, array
└── object, binary
10. Mapping (src/mapping/) - Feature: mapping
Schema mapping and transformation:
SchemaMatcher: Match source fields to target schemaLlmMatcher: LLM-enhanced matching with semantic understandingMappingGenerator: Generate field mappings with confidence scoresTransformGenerator: Generate transformation scripts (SQL, JQ, Python, PySpark)TransformValidator: Validate transformation correctnessMappingPersistence: Save/load mapping configurations
Matching Strategies:
- Exact name matching
- Fuzzy name matching (Levenshtein distance)
- Type compatibility analysis
- Semantic matching via LLM
- Pattern-based matching
Transform Outputs:
- SQL (standard, Databricks, Snowflake dialects)
- JQ for JSON transformation
- Python/PySpark for complex transformations
11. Pipeline (src/pipeline/) - Feature: pipeline
End-to-end data modeling pipeline:
Pipeline: Orchestrate multi-stage data processingPipelineStage: Individual stage definitionsCheckpoint: Save/restore pipeline stateStageExecutor: Execute individual stagesPipelineConfig: Pipeline configuration and options
Pipeline Stages:
1. Ingest → Stage raw JSON files to DuckDB
2. Infer → Analyze data and infer schema
3. Refine → LLM-enhanced schema refinement
4. Map → Match to target schema, generate transforms
5. Export → Generate ODCS, SQL, or other formats
Checkpoint System:
- Save state after each stage
- Resume from any checkpoint
- Track stage completion and metadata
12. LLM Integration (src/llm/) - Feature: llm
LLM provider abstraction for AI-enhanced features:
LlmProvider: Trait for LLM provider implementationsOpenAIProvider: OpenAI GPT-4/GPT-3.5 integrationOllamaProvider: Local Ollama model supportAnthropicProvider: Anthropic Claude integrationLlmConfig: Provider configuration and API keysPromptBuilder: Build prompts for schema operations
Feature Flags:
llm: Core LLM abstractionllm-openai: OpenAI providerllm-ollama: Ollama providerllm-anthropic: Anthropic provider
LLM-Enhanced Operations:
- Schema refinement (better names, descriptions, types)
- Semantic field matching
- Transformation hint generation
- Documentation generation
Storage Architecture
Storage Backend Trait
All storage operations go through the StorageBackend trait:
#[async_trait(?Send)]
pub trait StorageBackend: Send + Sync {
async fn read_file(&self, path: &str) -> Result<Vec<u8>, StorageError>;
async fn write_file(&self, path: &str, content: &[u8]) -> Result<(), StorageError>;
async fn list_files(&self, dir: &str) -> Result<Vec<String>, StorageError>;
async fn file_exists(&self, path: &str) -> Result<bool, StorageError>;
async fn delete_file(&self, path: &str) -> Result<(), StorageError>;
async fn create_dir(&self, path: &str) -> Result<(), StorageError>;
async fn dir_exists(&self, path: &str) -> Result<bool, StorageError>;
}
Platform Implementations
File System Backend (native-fs feature)
- Platform: Native applications (desktop, CLI, server)
- Storage: Local file system
- Runtime: Tokio async runtime
- Use Case: Desktop applications, CLI tools, server applications
Browser Storage Backend (wasm feature)
- Platform: Web applications (WASM)
- Storage: IndexedDB or localStorage
- Runtime: WASM runtime (browser-provided)
- Use Case: Web applications, offline-first apps
API Backend (api-backend feature, default)
- Platform: Any (HTTP client)
- Storage: Remote HTTP API
- Runtime: Reqwest HTTP client
- Use Case: Cloud-native applications, mobile apps, microservices
Database Architecture
The SDK includes an optional database layer that provides 10-100x performance improvements over file-based operations for large workspaces. The database caches YAML data in an indexed format for fast queries.
Database Backend Trait
All database operations go through the DatabaseBackend trait:
#[async_trait(?Send)]
pub trait DatabaseBackend: Send + Sync {
async fn initialize(&self) -> DatabaseResult<()>;
async fn health_check(&self) -> DatabaseResult<bool>;
async fn execute_query(&self, sql: &str) -> DatabaseResult<QueryResult>;
async fn sync_tables(&self, workspace_id: Uuid, tables: &[Table]) -> DatabaseResult<usize>;
async fn sync_domains(&self, workspace_id: Uuid, domains: &[Domain]) -> DatabaseResult<usize>;
async fn export_tables(&self, workspace_id: Uuid) -> DatabaseResult<Vec<Table>>;
// ... more operations
}
Database Backends
DuckDB Backend (duckdb-backend feature)
- Type: Embedded analytical database
- Use Case: CLI tools, local development, offline analysis
- Performance: Excellent for analytical queries, columnar storage
- File:
.data-model.duckdbin workspace root
PostgreSQL Backend (postgres-backend feature)
- Type: Server-based relational database
- Use Case: Team environments, server deployments, shared access
- Performance: Excellent for concurrent access, ACID transactions
- Connection: Via connection string (e.g.,
postgresql://user:pass@localhost/db)
Sync Engine
The SyncEngine manages bidirectional synchronization between YAML files and the database:
YAML Files ←→ SyncEngine ←→ Database
Features:
- Incremental Sync: Only syncs changed files using SHA256 hashes
- Bidirectional: YAML → Database (import) and Database → YAML (export)
- Change Detection: Tracks file hashes to detect modifications
- Conflict Resolution: Database is source of truth during export
Database Schema
The database schema mirrors the YAML structure:
- workspaces: Workspace metadata and configuration
- domains: Business domain definitions
- tables: Table/data contract definitions
- columns: Column definitions with all ODCS properties
- relationships: Table relationships and foreign keys
- file_hashes: File hash tracking for incremental sync
Git Hooks Integration
The database layer integrates with Git for automatic synchronization:
Pre-commit Hook:
- Exports database changes to YAML files
- Ensures YAML files are up-to-date before commit
Post-checkout Hook:
- Syncs YAML files to database after checkout
- Keeps database in sync with branch changes
CLI Commands
The database functionality is exposed via CLI commands:
# Initialize database for a workspace
data-modelling-cli db init --workspace ./my-workspace --backend duckdb
# Sync YAML files to database
data-modelling-cli db sync --workspace ./my-workspace
# Check database status
data-modelling-cli db status --workspace ./my-workspace
# Export database to YAML files
data-modelling-cli db export --workspace ./my-workspace
# Query the database directly
data-modelling-cli query "SELECT * FROM tables" --workspace ./my-workspace
Configuration
Database configuration is stored in .data-model.toml:
[database]
backend = "duckdb"
path = ".data-model.duckdb"
[sync]
auto_sync = true
watch = false
[git]
hooks_enabled = true
[postgres]
connection_string = "postgresql://localhost/datamodel"
pool_size = 5
Process Flow
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Workspace │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ YAML Files │ ←─→ │ SyncEngine │ ←─→ │ Database │ │
│ │ (.odcs.yaml)│ │ │ │ (DuckDB/ │ │
│ │ (.odps.yaml)│ │ │ │ PostgreSQL)│ │
│ │ (.cads.yaml)│ │ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Git Hooks │ │ CLI │ │ SQL Queries │ │
│ │ (pre-commit │ │ (db init, │ │ (query cmd) │ │
│ │ post- │ │ db sync, │ │ │ │
│ │ checkout) │ │ db status) │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Data Pipeline Architecture
The SDK includes a comprehensive data pipeline system for end-to-end schema discovery and transformation.
Pipeline Overview
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Data Pipeline │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ INGEST │ → │ INFER │ → │ REFINE │ → │ MAP │ → ... │
│ │ │ │ │ │ (LLM) │ │ │ │
│ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Checkpoint Storage (.checkpoints/) │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Stage Details
| Stage | Input | Output | Feature Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingest | JSON files (glob pattern) | DuckDB staged_json table | staging |
| Infer | Staged JSON data | InferredSchema (types, stats) | inference |
| Refine | InferredSchema | Refined schema (LLM-enhanced) | llm |
| Map | Source + Target schemas | SchemaMapping + transforms | mapping |
| Export | Mapping | ODCS, SQL, transforms | core |
Checkpoint System
Each stage creates a checkpoint that can be used to resume processing:
.checkpoints/
├── ingest.json # Files processed, batch IDs
├── infer.json # Inferred schema snapshot
├── refine.json # LLM refinements applied
├── map.json # Field mappings, transforms
└── export.json # Output files generated
Checkpoint Contents:
- Stage name and completion status
- Timestamp of completion
- Stage-specific data (serialized)
- Dependencies and configuration
Staging Layer
The staging layer uses DuckDB for high-performance JSON ingestion:
-- Staged JSON table structure
CREATE TABLE staged_json (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
partition VARCHAR,
file_path VARCHAR,
line_number INTEGER,
raw_json JSON,
ingested_at TIMESTAMP
);
-- Batch tracking
CREATE TABLE batch_metadata (
batch_id VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY,
partition VARCHAR,
file_pattern VARCHAR,
files_processed INTEGER,
records_ingested INTEGER,
started_at TIMESTAMP,
completed_at TIMESTAMP,
status VARCHAR
);
Schema Inference Pipeline
Raw JSON Records
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Sample Records │ (configurable sample size)
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Type Detection │ → Semantic types (email, UUID, URL, etc.)
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Statistics │ → Nullability, uniqueness, cardinality
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Constraint │ → NOT NULL, UNIQUE, value ranges
│ Inference │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ LLM Refinement │ → Better names, descriptions, types
│ (optional) │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
InferredSchema
Mapping Pipeline
Source Schema Target Schema
│ │
└──────────┬───────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Field Matching │
│ (name + type + │
│ semantic/LLM) │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Transform │ → Type conversions, format changes
│ Detection │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Script │ → SQL, JQ, Python, PySpark
│ Generation │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
SchemaMapping
File Organization
Flat File Structure
Files are organized using a flat naming convention within a workspace:
workspace/
├── schemas/ # Schema reference (JSON Schema files)
│ ├── odcs-json-schema-v3.1.0.json
│ ├── odcl-json-schema-1.2.1.json
│ ├── odps-json-schema-latest.json
│ └── cads.schema.json
├── workspace.yaml # Workspace metadata with assets and relationships
├── myworkspace_customer-service_customers.odcs.yaml # ODCS table
├── myworkspace_customer-service_orders.odcs.yaml # ODCS table
├── myworkspace_customer-service_customer-product.odps.yaml # ODPS product
├── myworkspace_customer-service_recommendation-model.cads.yaml # CADS asset
├── myworkspace_order-processing_shipments.odcs.yaml # Another domain's table
└── myworkspace_order-processing_tracking.odcs.yaml
File Naming Convention
Pattern: {workspace}_{domain}_{system}_{resource}.{type}.yaml
- Workspace file:
workspace.yaml(contains domains, systems, assets, relationships) - ODCS tables:
{workspace}_{domain}_{resource}.odcs.yaml - ODPS products:
{workspace}_{domain}_{resource}.odps.yaml - CADS assets:
{workspace}_{domain}_{resource}.cads.yaml - With system:
{workspace}_{domain}_{system}_{resource}.{type}.yaml
Benefits
- Logical Grouping: Domain/system encoded in filename
- Scalability: Easy to manage large numbers of assets
- Ownership: Clear ownership via naming convention
- Version Control: Better Git history with flat structure
- Discovery: Easy to find assets by filename pattern
Integration Patterns
Pattern 1: Native Application
use data_modelling_sdk::storage::filesystem::FileSystemStorageBackend;
use data_modelling_sdk::model::{ModelLoader, ModelSaver};
use data_modelling_sdk::import::ODCSImporter;
// Initialize storage
let storage = FileSystemStorageBackend::new("/path/to/workspace");
let loader = ModelLoader::new(storage.clone());
let saver = ModelSaver::new(storage);
// Load domains
let result = loader.load_domains("workspace").await?;
// Import new table
let mut importer = ODCSImporter::new();
let (table, _) = importer.parse_table(odcs_yaml)?;
// Save to domain
saver.save_domain("workspace", &domain, &tables, &products, &assets).await?;
Pattern 2: Web Application (WASM)
use data_modelling_sdk::storage::browser::BrowserStorageBackend;
use data_modelling_sdk::model::ModelLoader;
// Initialize browser storage
let storage = BrowserStorageBackend::new("db_name", "store_name");
let loader = ModelLoader::new(storage);
// Load domains
let result = loader.load_domains("workspace").await?;
// Use in JavaScript
#[wasm_bindgen]
pub fn load_domains() -> Promise {
// WASM bindings handle async
}
Pattern 3: API Server
use data_modelling_sdk::storage::api::ApiStorageBackend;
use data_modelling_sdk::model::ApiModelLoader;
// Initialize API backend
let storage = ApiStorageBackend::new("https://api.example.com", Some("session_id"));
let loader = ApiModelLoader::new(storage);
// Load via API
let result = loader.load_model("domain-name").await?;
Pattern 4: Format Conversion
use data_modelling_sdk::convert::convert_to_odcs;
// Convert any format to ODCS
let odcs_yaml = convert_to_odcs(input_yaml, None)?;
Pattern 5: Data Pipeline (Staging → Schema → Mapping)
use data_modelling_sdk::pipeline::{Pipeline, PipelineConfig, PipelineStage};
use data_modelling_sdk::staging::StagingDatabase;
use data_modelling_sdk::inference::SchemaInferer;
use data_modelling_sdk::mapping::SchemaMatcher;
// Initialize pipeline with checkpointing
let config = PipelineConfig {
checkpoint_dir: ".checkpoints".into(),
source_pattern: "data/**/*.json".into(),
target_schema: Some("target_schema.odcs.yaml".into()),
..Default::default()
};
let mut pipeline = Pipeline::new(config)?;
// Run full pipeline (resumes from checkpoint if available)
let result = pipeline.run().await?;
// Or run individual stages
pipeline.run_stage(PipelineStage::Ingest).await?;
pipeline.run_stage(PipelineStage::Infer).await?;
pipeline.run_stage(PipelineStage::Map).await?;
// Access results
let schema = pipeline.get_inferred_schema()?;
let mapping = pipeline.get_schema_mapping()?;
Pattern 6: LLM-Enhanced Schema Refinement
use data_modelling_sdk::llm::{LlmProvider, OpenAIProvider};
use data_modelling_sdk::inference::SchemaRefiner;
// Initialize LLM provider
let provider = OpenAIProvider::new(api_key, "gpt-4")?;
// Refine inferred schema with LLM
let refiner = SchemaRefiner::new(Box::new(provider));
let refined_schema = refiner.refine(&inferred_schema).await?;
// Refinements include:
// - Better column names (snake_case normalization)
// - Semantic type detection (email, phone, URL)
// - Business-friendly descriptions
// - Suggested constraints
Pattern 7: Schema Mapping with Transform Generation
use data_modelling_sdk::mapping::{SchemaMatcher, TransformGenerator, TransformFormat};
// Match source to target schema
let matcher = SchemaMatcher::new();
let mapping = matcher.match_schemas(&source_schema, &target_schema)?;
// Generate transformation scripts
let generator = TransformGenerator::new();
// SQL transformation
let sql = generator.generate(&mapping, TransformFormat::Sql)?;
// JQ transformation
let jq = generator.generate(&mapping, TransformFormat::Jq)?;
// PySpark transformation
let pyspark = generator.generate(&mapping, TransformFormat::PySpark)?;
Use Cases
Use Case 1: Data Catalog Application
Scenario: Build a data catalog that allows users to discover, document, and manage data assets.
SDK Usage:
- Import schemas from various sources (SQL, JSON Schema, AVRO)
- Organize by business domain
- Export to multiple formats for different consumers
- Validate schemas and detect conflicts
Architecture:
Web Frontend (WASM)
↓
Data Modelling SDK (Browser Storage)
↓
IndexedDB (Browser)
Use Case 2: Schema Registry
Scenario: Centralized schema registry for microservices.
SDK Usage:
- Store schemas in domain-based structure
- Validate schemas against JSON Schema definitions
- Provide format conversion (AVRO → JSON Schema → ODCS)
- Track schema versions and relationships
Architecture:
Microservices
↓
HTTP API
↓
Data Modelling SDK (API Backend)
↓
File System / Object Storage
Use Case 3: Data Governance Platform
Scenario: Platform for data governance, lineage, and quality.
SDK Usage:
- Import data contracts from various sources
- Organize by business domain
- Track compute assets (AI/ML models, ETL pipelines)
- Validate schemas and detect conflicts
- Export governance reports
Architecture:
Governance UI
↓
Data Modelling SDK (File System)
↓
Git Repository (Version Control)
Use Case 4: CLI Tool
Scenario: Command-line tool for schema management.
SDK Usage:
- Import schemas from files
- Convert between formats
- Validate schemas
- Generate documentation
Architecture:
CLI Tool
↓
Data Modelling SDK (File System)
↓
Local File System
Use Case 5: Data Product Management
Scenario: Manage data products linking multiple data contracts.
SDK Usage:
- Define ODPS data products
- Link to ODCS tables
- Organize by domain
- Track product versions and status
Architecture:
Product Management UI
↓
Data Modelling SDK (API Backend)
↓
Cloud Storage (S3, Azure Blob)
Use Case 6: Schema Discovery Pipeline
Scenario: Automatically discover and document schemas from raw JSON data files.
SDK Usage:
- Stage JSON files with batch tracking and resume support
- Infer schema with type detection (18+ semantic types)
- Refine schema with LLM for better names/descriptions
- Map to existing target schema
- Generate transformation scripts (SQL, JQ, PySpark)
- Export to ODCS data contracts
Architecture:
JSON Files (S3/Local)
↓
Staging Layer (DuckDB)
↓
Schema Inference
↓
LLM Refinement (OpenAI/Ollama)
↓
Schema Mapping
↓
ODCS Export + Transform Scripts
Use Case 7: Data Migration with Schema Mapping
Scenario: Migrate data between systems with different schemas.
SDK Usage:
- Import source schema (SQL DDL, JSON Schema, etc.)
- Import target schema (ODCS, SQL DDL, etc.)
- Generate field mappings with confidence scores
- Review and adjust mappings
- Generate transformation scripts for ETL tools
- Validate transformations
Architecture:
Source System Schema
↓
Schema Matcher (+ LLM)
↓
Mapping Configuration
↓
Transform Generator
↓
ETL Pipeline (SQL/Spark/JQ)
↓
Target System
Summary
The Data Modelling SDK provides a robust, cross-platform foundation for data modeling operations. Key strengths:
- Multi-platform: Works in native, web, and API environments
- Multi-format: Supports all major data contract formats
- Domain-driven: Organizes assets by business domain
- Validation: Built-in validation and conflict detection
- Extensible: Easy to extend with new formats or backends
- Schema Discovery: Automatic schema inference from raw data
- LLM-Enhanced: AI-powered schema refinement and matching
- Transform Generation: Automatic SQL, JQ, PySpark script generation
- Pipeline Support: End-to-end data modeling with checkpointing
Use the SDK when building data governance tools, schema registries, data catalogs, data migration pipelines, or any application that needs to work with data contracts across multiple formats and platforms.
For more information:
- Schema Overview Guide - Detailed schema documentation
- Pipeline Tutorial - End-to-end pipeline guide
- CLI Reference - Command-line interface documentation
- README - Quick start and usage examples
- LLM.txt - Technical reference