Dream.exe: Can Video Generation Models Dream Executable Robot Manipulation?

June 3, 2026 · View on GitHub

Dream.exe: Can Video Generation Models Dream Executable Robot Manipulation?

Rui Zhao1,*, Kaiming Yang1,*, Jifeng Zhu1,†, Siyang Chen1,†, Ziqi Wang1, Weijia Wu1, Kevin Qinghong Lin2, Heng Wang3, Mike Zheng Shou1,‡

1Show Lab, National University of Singapore    2University of Oxford    3Tencent

*Equal contribution    Equal contribution (second authors)    Corresponding author


Important

🚧 Code, benchmark data, and evaluation tools will be open-sourced here. Stay tuned! Please ⭐ star and watch this repository to be notified when the release lands.


📖 Overview

Can a video generation model's dream of manipulation actually be executed by a robot?

Dream.exe answers this by taking generated videos out of the screen and into a physics simulator. Instead of judging a video only by how good it looks, we convert the motion it depicts into a robot trajectory, execute it, and measure whether the task actually succeeds. Execution success then becomes a grounding signal that purely visual metrics cannot offer.

What's inside:

  • 🎬 Video-to-execution pipeline. From a single scene image and task prompt, we generate a manipulation video, lift it into a 3D robot trajectory, and roll it out in simulation.
  • 🧪 101-task benchmark. Manually curated from RoboCasa and stratified into three levels of physical complexity, scored on visual quality, trajectory fidelity, and execution success.
  • 🤖 8 models evaluated. Frontier closed-source, open-source, and robot-specific video generators under one unified protocol.

Key findings:

  • ✅ Generative priors from internet-scale data already encode meaningful physical knowledge. Several models achieve measurable execution success with no robot-specific supervision.
  • ⚠️ Visual quality is a poor predictor of executability. Physical-plausibility scores barely correlate with task success.
  • 🧗 Long-horizon tasks remain hard. Multi-stage manipulation exposes the limits of current models.

🧪 Benchmark Task Suite

Overview of the Dream.exe task suite

Overview of the Dream.exe task suite. Left: representative scenes and task prompts from each difficulty level. Top right: distribution of 101 tasks across the three levels. Bottom right: camera viewpoints are deliberately diversified across scenes to improve generalization coverage.

The tasks are stratified into three levels of increasing physical complexity:

  • Level 1, Single-object manipulation. Geometrically consistent end-effector motion with correct grasp/release timing.
  • Level 2, Multi-object interaction. Reasoning about object-to-object relationships and placement.
  • Level 3, Multi-stage composite tasks. Maintaining physical coherence across a long task horizon with correctly sequenced sub-goals.

📌 Citation

If you find our work useful, please consider citing:

@article{zhao2026dreamexe,
  title   = {Dream.exe: Can Video Generation Models Dream Executable Robot Manipulation?},
  author  = {Zhao, Rui and Yang, Kaiming and Zhu, Jifeng and Chen, Siyang and Wang, Ziqi and Wu, Weijia and Lin, Kevin Qinghong and Wang, Heng and Shou, Mike Zheng},
  year    = {2026}
}