RFC-XXXX: Title

January 9, 2026 ยท View on GitHub

  • Status: Draft | Under Review | Accepted | Rejected | Implemented | Superseded
  • Author(s): Your Name (@github-handle)
  • Created: YYYY-MM-DD
  • Last Updated: YYYY-MM-DD
  • Target Repository: toolhive | toolhive-studio | toolhive-registry | toolhive-registry-server | multiple
  • Related Issues: toolhive#1234 (if applicable)

Summary

A brief (2-3 sentence) description of the proposed change. This should be clear enough that someone can understand the essence of the proposal without reading the full document.

Problem Statement

Describe the problem this RFC is trying to solve. Include:

  • What is the current behavior or limitation?
  • Who is affected by this problem?
  • Why is this problem worth solving?

Goals

List the specific goals this RFC aims to achieve:

  • Goal 1
  • Goal 2
  • Goal 3

Non-Goals

Explicitly state what this RFC does NOT aim to address. This helps set scope and prevents scope creep:

  • Non-goal 1
  • Non-goal 2

Proposed Solution

Describe your proposed solution in detail. This section should be comprehensive enough for someone to implement the solution.

High-Level Design

Provide an overview of the design. Include diagrams where helpful (Mermaid diagrams are encouraged):

flowchart LR
    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
    B --> C[Component C]

Detailed Design

Break down the implementation details:

Component Changes

Describe changes to existing components or new components being introduced.

API Changes

Document any API changes, including:

  • New endpoints or methods
  • Modified signatures
  • Deprecated functionality
// Example API change
type NewInterface interface {
    Method(ctx context.Context, param string) (Result, error)
}

Configuration Changes

Document any new configuration options:

# Example configuration
newFeature:
  enabled: true
  setting: value

Data Model Changes

Describe any changes to data models, schemas, or storage.

Security Considerations

This section is required. Security is a core concern for ToolHive. Address the following:

Threat Model

  • What are the potential threats introduced by this change?
  • Who are the potential attackers and what are their capabilities?

Authentication and Authorization

  • How does this change affect authentication?
  • What authorization checks are required?
  • Are there any changes to permission models?

Data Security

  • What sensitive data does this feature handle?
  • How is data protected at rest and in transit?
  • Are there any data retention or deletion considerations?

Input Validation

  • What user input does this feature accept?
  • How is input validated and sanitized?
  • What are the potential injection vectors?

Secrets Management

  • Does this feature require any secrets or credentials?
  • How are secrets stored and accessed?
  • Are secrets properly rotated and revocable?

Audit and Logging

  • What security-relevant events should be logged?
  • Are there any compliance requirements?

Mitigations

  • What security controls are implemented?
  • How do these mitigations address the identified threats?

Alternatives Considered

Describe alternative approaches you considered and why you chose the proposed solution:

Alternative 1: [Name]

  • Description
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Why not chosen

Alternative 2: [Name]

  • Description
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Why not chosen

Compatibility

Backward Compatibility

  • Is this change backward compatible?
  • If not, what is the migration path?
  • Are there any deprecation timelines?

Forward Compatibility

  • How does this design accommodate future changes?
  • Are there extensibility points?

Implementation Plan

Outline the implementation approach:

Phase 1: [Description]

  • Task 1
  • Task 2

Phase 2: [Description]

  • Task 3
  • Task 4

Dependencies

List any dependencies on other work or external factors.

Testing Strategy

Describe how this feature will be tested:

  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • End-to-end tests
  • Performance tests
  • Security tests

Documentation

What documentation needs to be created or updated?

  • User documentation
  • API documentation
  • Architecture documentation
  • Runbooks or operational guides

Open Questions

List any unresolved questions that need to be addressed during the review:

  1. Question 1
  2. Question 2

References

  • Link to relevant documentation
  • Link to related RFCs or proposals
  • Link to external specifications or standards

RFC Lifecycle

Review History

DateReviewerDecisionNotes
YYYY-MM-DD@reviewerUnder ReviewInitial submission

Implementation Tracking

RepositoryPRStatus
toolhive#XXXXMerged