TypeScript Styleguide
March 4, 2025 ยท View on GitHub
Due to stringent security and correctness requirements, we have to use a subset of TypeScript features that are known to be less unsound.
Do
Prefer the most simple and basic language features.
- Variables
const x = f() - Functions
(x: T) => x,f(x) - Objects
{ foo: 'bar' },x.foo,const { foo } = x; - Statements
if,for,return - Aliases
type F<T> = { foo: T } - Simple types
number,string,boolean,undefined - Literal types
1,"hello" - Unions of literal types
1 | 2 | 3 - Tagged unions
{ kind: 'A', a: number } | { kind: 'B' }
Don't
Don't explicitly break the type system
- Don't use
as, exceptas const. It was meant to gradually type legacy code, not for production use in TS-native projects. Often,x as Twas meant to beconst y: T = x;orx satisfies T. - Don't use
any. Its actual meaning is "completely disregard type errors here". Preferunknownornever. - Don't use guard types
x is T. These are justasin disguise:const foo = (x: 1 | 2): x is 1 => x === 2;. It might be used in straightforward cases, such as ADT boilerplate. - Don't use overloading. It's almost the same as intersection types, which are broken.
- Don't use @ts-ignore. It's a worse version of
asthat can cause the TS compiler to enter an arbitrary incorrect state. - Don't use
x!operator. It does no checks at runtime, and is essentiallyx as NotNull<typeof x>. - Don't pick into values that are generic:
<T>(x: T) => typeof x === 'number'. Properly designed languages do not allow this.
Workarounds for bugs in the TS compiler will sometimes require an as or any. In this case, the workaround should be small and generic, separated into its own file, and annotated with a link to the corresponding TypeScript issue.
For example, ["a", "b"].includes(x) doesn't narrow x to 'a' | 'b'. Instead of multiple x as ('a' | 'b') over the whole codebase, we can define a wrapper once in util.ts, thoroughly test and review it, and keep it in containment this way.
// `extends string` is usually a bad idea, but `key is K` is an even worse idea
export const includes = <const K extends string>(
keys: readonly K[],
key: string,
): key is K => {
// we have to do this, otherwise, the next line will complain that `key` isn't `K`
const keys1: readonly string[] = keys;
return keys1.includes(key);
};
Don't use mutability unless required
- Don't use
let. Most likely it should be a separate function where each assignment is areturn. - Never use
var. They're hoisted up to the function or module scope.for (var i = 0; i < n; ++i) a.push(() => i)creates an array of functions referencing the same value ofi === n. - Never use
letin tests. Thejestexecution order is hard to understand and will most likely lead to flaky tests. - Never use
letglobal variables. These break tree-shaking, make code untestable and make behavior dependent on module initialization order. - Don't assign to function arguments
(x) => { x = 1; } - Don't use
for (let ...)loops. Prefer built-in array methods. - All object fields must be
readonly:{ readonly foo: string }. - Tag fields on tagged unions have to be readonly. By assigning into a tag field of an
A | Bunion, we can narrow it to anAtype while it will haveB(or some arbitrary combination ofAandB) at runtime. - Arrays should be readonly:
readonly string[] - Tuples should be readonly:
readonly [string, number] SetandMapshould be readonly:env: ReadonlyMap<string, Type>- Clone arrays before
.sort(),.reverse(),.splice():[...arr].sort() - Prefer freezing highly reused objects with
Object.freeze. - Avoid the
voidtype.
Don't use untagged unions
- Don't use untagged non-literal unions
{ a: 1 } | { b: 2 }. These will require anin-condition for narrowing to select either of the branches. - Don't use
in. TypeScript has no distinction between open and closed object types. There might be no field in an object type, but there will be one at runtime. Narrowing forinoperators is also buggy in other ways and doesn't correctly apply to either of its arguments.
Don't use JS object "features"
- Don't use optional fields
foo?: Bar. Every?doubles the number of cases that should be tested. Eventually, some combination of non-defined and undefined fields will be non-semantic. Prefer at least an explicitfoo: Bar | undefined, or better, create a type with a descriptive name to make it a tagged union. - Don't use optional fields. In JS, there is a distinction between a field that is not defined and a field that is
undefined(sic).'a' in {} === false,'a' in { a: undefined } === true. TypeScript doesn't handle this properly in its type system. - Don't use
Proxy. These break the type safety, are incorrectly handled in debuggers, and lead to unexpected heisenbugs. - Don't use
getandset. SeeProxyabove. Use explicitgetFooandsetFoofunctions or avoid mutable state. - Don't use
...with objects. It will require intersection types or inheritance to type. Prefer aggregation:{ ...a, b }โ{ a, b }. - Don't use
interface ... extends. There is no way to distinguish objects supporting parent and child interfaces at runtime safely.- Except where it's required to untie type recursion. For example
type Foo = A<Foo>would only work asinterface Foo extends A<Foo> {}
- Except where it's required to untie type recursion. For example
- Don't use objects as
Maps. Objects have a set of quirks: numeric keys get listed before string keys, key order is not guaranteed, keys can be inherited fromObject.prototype, and the__proto__key can be used for prototype pollution exploits. Unless a high performance of hashmap is needed, or an object is statically defined, useMap.
Don't use JS function "features"
- Don't use optional parameters
(x?: number) => {}. TypeScript has a quirk that allows passing the function with fewer arguments to a parameter list that requires more. Eventually, this leads to passing unexpected values to optional parameters. Prefer decomposing the function into two, where one takes a full set of parameters, and the other one is a simpler version that takes less. - Don't use default parameters
(x = 1) => {}. See the reasoning above. - Don't use
...restparameters. TypeScript doesn't have "mapped tuple types", so typing these will be problematic. In most cases, passing an array would suffice and would only take two more characters to type. - Don't use
arguments. This is a worse version of...restthat isn't even an array. - Don't pass functions directly to built-in functions
.map(foo). A good example of why this is a bad idea:["10", "10", "10"].map(parseInt). Prefer.map(x => foo(x)).
Don't use OOP
- Don't use methods. Methods don't store a reference to
thisin their closure and take it from object syntactically, i.e.,x.f()would usexasthis. It meansconst { f } = x; f();will be a runtime error, and TypeScript would emit no error here at compile time. - Don't use inheritance. Overriding is allowed in JS, but Liskov substitution is not guaranteed.
- Don't use
class. In TSprivateis only a type system feature, and all the private fields are globally accessible at runtime. Worse, created objects have part of their description inprototype, and can't be worked with as regular objects. If a class is converted to a regular function, all the fields are correctly private; accessing them requires nothis. prefix, and in most frequent cases, only one exposed method can be returned directly.
Don't use funny types
- Don't use conditional types. These lack any theory behind them and were meant to type legacy JS code.
- Don't use
Omit,Pick,Exclude,andExtract. These are conditional types in disguise. - Don't use mapped object types
{ [K in keyof T]: ... }. These lack any theory behind them, don't have the introducing syntax, and are buggy. - Don't use index types
T["foo"]. They disregard variance at their use site and most likely will pin types in another library/module with both lower and upper bounds; thus, they're very detrimental to modularity. Most likely, the type of thefoofield should be defined separately. - Don't use indexed types
{ [k: string]: number }. It'sRecord<string, number>. The only valid case is to avoid type recursion quirks in TS:type Json = null | boolean | number | string | Json[] | { [k: string]: Json }would emit an error withRecord<string, Json> - Don't define bounds on generic parameters
<T extends (foo: number) => string>. Type inference is broken here and, in many cases, will force TS to infer the type of bound instead of the expected type. - Don't use intersection types
A & B. They are so broken it's hard even to count them as intersection types. - Don't use
Object,object,{},Function. There's barely a case when common supertypes of objects and functions are even needed.
Don't use arcane language "features"
- Don't use
export default. It breaks IDE features such as renaming and also has complex semantics. - Don't use
whileloops. Every iteration must have at least an explicit "fuel" check.whilealways eventually leads to infinite loops. - Don't use
for (... in ...). It requires ahasOwnPropertycheck. PreferObject.entries,Object.keys, orObject.values. - Don't define
toStringandtoJSONon objects. These obfuscate results ofconsole.log, making objects different depending on how they're logged (util.inspectwouldn't use them). - Don't use
JSON.parseandJSON.stringifywithoutzod. Both functions have very broken types:JSON.stringify(undefined).
Other considerations
- Avoid unnecessary switch. Switch statements require extra considerations for unexpected passthrough, are bulky, and take an extra function to make exhaustive checks work. Unless
switchcan be rationalized, prefermakeVisitorfromsrc/utils/tricks.ts. - Avoid unnecessary bigint. We have to work with
bigintbecause TVM supports ints of 257-bit length, but in the rest of the code,bigintwould only cause issues with debugging it. - Beware of
${}in template strings. Any inlining succeeds, and there won't be any compile-time errors even if it's a function${(x: number) => x}. - Avoid
null.typeof null === 'object', and there isundefinedanyway. - Avoid exceptions. Exceptions are untyped. Pass error continuations explicitly
(onFooError: () => T) => T. An example can be found insrc/grammar/parser-error.ts. - Avoid tuples. TS gives them minimal distinction from arrays, and the type system is broken around them. Occasionally, for performance reasons, tuples might be a better option than objects.
- Avoid
enum. It's equivalent to unions since 5.0, except generates boilerplate JS code. A version that doesn't generate extraneous code,const enum, is not properly supported bybabel. - Avoid iterators. They're untypable unless fixed in JS standard. Prefer generators. Prefer iterating with
for (... of ...).