DRGBT-1K: A Large-scale High-quality Benchmark for Dynamic RGBT Tracking

July 15, 2026 · View on GitHub

Dataset Evaluation

Online Evaluation Platform: https://www.codabench.org/competitions/17422/


1. Motivation

RGBT tracking receives a surge of interest in the computer vision community, but existing RGBT benchmarks assume a single, fixed observation platform with synchronized RGB and thermal sensors. In real-world collaborative perception systems, however, the target is often observed by multiple heterogeneous platforms (e.g., UAVs and ground cameras) that carry different sensors and may hand off tracking responsibility over time. This leads to Dynamic RGBT (DRGBT) tracking, where both the available modalities and observation viewpoints change dynamically.

The existing DRGBT dataset (DRGBT603) is limited in scale and contains many synthetically constructed cross-platform sequences. To address these limitations, we present DRGBT-1K — the first large-scale, fully real-captured DRGBT tracking benchmark.

Fig 1. Motivation, challenge attributes, scale comparison, and representative sequences of DRGBT-1K


2. About DRGBT-1K Benchmark

Highlights

  • Fully Real-Captured: All 1,045 sequences are captured from real-world scenarios using real cross-platform handoffs, avoiding synthetic construction.
  • Large Scale: Contains 1,045 real sequences and 795K frame pairs in total (2,090 RGBT sequences considering multi-view perspectives).
  • High-Quality Annotations: Contains over 799K densely annotated target bounding boxes across multi-view sequences.
  • Multi-Platform Imaging Devices: Data collected using DJI Mavic 3T (UAV) and Hikvision RGBT Camera (handheld/ground), preserving genuine viewpoint discontinuities.
  • Rich Scenes and Categories: Covers 24 target categories across diverse scenarios (daytime, nighttime, highways, parks, campuses, etc.).
  • Real-World Challenges: Annotated with 15 challenge attributes reflecting practical DRGBT tracking difficulties.

Data Samples

Below are representative samples from DRGBT-1K, showcasing various scenes, categories, and cross-platform viewpoints (RGB and thermal pairs from both UAV and ground perspectives):

Representative samples from DRGBT-1K across diverse scenes and categories


3. Dataset Statistics

Comparison with Existing Benchmarks

DatasetPub. InfoTask TypeView Num.Sequence Num.Total FramesObject ClassesAttr.Dynamic ModalityCross PlatformReal Cross-platform Seq. Num.Synthetic Cross-platform Seq. Num.
GTOTTIP 2017RGBT1507.8K9700
RGBT210CVPR 2018RGBT1210104.7K221200
RGBT234TPAMI 2019RGBT1234116.7K221200
LasHeRTIP 2021RGBT11224734.8K321900
VTUAVCVPR 2022RGBT15001.7M131300
DRGBT603TIP 2026DRGBT26031.49M2912203400
DRGBT-1K (Ours)DRGBT21045 (2090)†795K241510450

†indicates that DRGBT contains 2,090 RGBT tracking sequences in total.

Distribution Statistics

The following figure shows: (a) Category distribution across daytime and nighttime scenarios, (b) Visualization of subset and challenge attribute co-occurrence relationships, and (c) Distribution of challenge attributes with train/test splits.

Distribution statistics of DRGBT-1K

The frame distribution between UAV and ground viewpoints is highly balanced, accounting for 50.7% and 49.3% respectively, which significantly reduces viewpoint bias in cross-platform evaluation. In addition, quantitative analysis shows that platform transitions induce severe target scale variations: Ground-to-UAV handoffs result in target area reduction in 64.8% of cases, while UAV-to-Ground handoffs lead to target area expansion in 62.8% of cases.

Distribution of modalities and platforms and target variation under platform switches

Distribution and Word Cloud Visualization of Category-Challenge Pairs

15 Challenge Attributes

DRGBT-1K annotates each sequence with 15 challenge attributes reflecting real-world tracking scenarios:

AttrFull NameDescription
HOHeavy OcclusionThe target is severely occluded.
POPartial OcclusionThe target is slightly or partially occluded.
LILow IlluminationThe sequence is captured under low-light conditions (e.g., nighttime).
LRLow ResolutionThe target region is blurred or has low visual resolution.
BCBackground ClutterThe background is complex and contains many interfering objects.
HIHigh IlluminationStrong illumination or glare appears in the scene.
SASimilar AppearanceSimilar objects appear near the target, making it hard to distinguish.
FLFrame LostSeveral consecutive frames are completely identical.
SOSmall ObjectThe target is very small in the image.
FMFast MotionThe target moves rapidly between adjacent frames.
OVOut-of-ViewThe target leaves the camera field of view and later reappears.
SVScale VariationThe target undergoes significant scale changes.
CMCamera MovingThe camera has obvious motion or shake.
TCThermal CrossoverTarget and background have similar temperatures (low thermal contrast).
ARCAspect Ratio ChangeThe aspect ratio of the bounding box is outside the range [0.5, 2].

4. Train/Test Split

We split DRGBT-1K into training and testing subsets according to the target category distribution, ensuring balanced representation across all 24 classes:

SplitSequencesUsage
Training800For training deep DRGBT trackers
Testing245For benchmarking and evaluation
Total1045

The training and testing sets maintain similar distributions in terms of target categories, challenge attributes, and day/night ratios.


5. Dataset Download

  • DRGBT-1K (Aligned): BaiduNetdisk(Password: g13h)
  • DRGBT-1K (Unaligned): BaiduNetdisk(Password: 6xxh)

    Note: Due to the physical structure of heterogeneous devices and sensor mechanisms, real-world data naturally exhibits modality offsets between RGB and TIR under different viewpoints. We provide this unaligned version (where the spatial deviation is constrained within [0.01D, 0.17D] and the initial bias is randomly sampled within [2%, 17%]D, with D being the image diagonal length) to facilitate research on spatial perturbation and cross-modality alignment.

Average RGB-TIR offset distribution in DRGBT-1K (Unaligned)


6. Dataset File Structure

sequence_name/
├── ground_viewq/
│   ├── RGB/
│   │   ├── 000001.jpg
│   │   └── ...
│   ├── TIR/
│   │   ├── 000001.jpg
│   │   └── ...
│   └── init.txt
├── uav_viewq/
│   ├── RGB/
│   │   ├── 000001.jpg
│   │   └── ...
│   ├── TIR/
│   │   ├── 000001.jpg
│   │   └── ...
│   └── init.txt
├── challenges.txt
├── modality.txt
├── platforms.txt
├── scene_class.txt
├── target_class.txt

7. Benchmark Results

Evaluation on DRGBT-1K

We evaluate multiple categories of tracking methods on DRGBT-1K, including RGBT trackers, modality-missing RGBT (MMRGBT) trackers, and DRGBT trackers, under the One-Pass Evaluation (OPE) protocol. The primary evaluation metrics are:

  • Precision Rate (PR): Percentage of frames whose center location error is within 20 pixels.
  • Normalized Precision Rate (NPR): Center location error normalized by target size.
  • Success Rate (SR): Bounding box overlap (IoU) evaluated using Area Under Curve (AUC).

Overall Performance on DRGBT-1K

Below are the baseline results of representative state-of-the-art trackers evaluated on the DRGBT-1K test set:

Method Source PR (%) NPR (%) SR (%)
RGBT Trackers
OSTrack ECCV'22 47.39 41.47 34.46
TBSI CVPR'23 43.89 38.81 32.34
TATrack AAAI'24 47.82 41.17 34.40
BAT AAAI'24 45.84 41.08 33.86
PURA CVPR'24 48.32 40.73 33.98
SDSTrack CVPR'24 40.66 33.64 28.23
MMLoRAT ECCV'24 47.76 43.06 34.92
CKD ACM MM'24 45.67 40.97 33.75
AINet AAAI'25 44.83 40.42 33.14
STTrack AAAI'25 22.57 17.38 16.61
CAFormer AAAI'25 46.06 39.80 33.51
FMTrack TCSVT'25 48.64 41.58 34.91
QSTNet TIP'25 44.21 39.20 32.27
MRTTrack PR'25 43.72 38.76 32.04
UATrack IJCV'26 46.92 40.77 34.02
GOLA CVPR'26 51.18 46.42 38.01
MMRGBT Trackers
IPT IJCV'25 46.52 39.89 33.46
TMKD PR'26 48.06 42.95 35.52
SCDT CVPR'26 45.57 36.41 29.91
DRGBT Trackers
CMRL TIP'26 43.03 38.48 31.82

Attribute- and Subset-based Performance

To analyze tracker performance under various scenarios, we evaluate the trackers across 15 challenge attributes and 3 variation subsets: Modality Variation Only (MVO, 209 sequences), Platform Variation Only (PVO, 209 sequences), and Combined Variation (CV, 627 sequences).

Each cell reports PR/SR (%). The best and second-best results under each row are highlighted in red and blue font, respectively. Based on the attribute- and subset-specific evaluation, we can observe that:

  • The dedicated DRGBT tracker CMRL achieves outstanding performance on the platform transition subsets (PVO and CV), demonstrating its robustness in handling viewpoint and platform switches. It also exhibits superior robustness under degradation-related attributes, achieving the best PR and SR scores under LR, HI, FL, OV, and CM.
  • GOLA achieves the best success rates (SR) across the largest number of individual challenge attributes (including PO, LI, SO, FM, SV, and ARC) and the MVO subset, reflecting its strong generalization in handling diverse challenge factors and dynamic modality variations.
  • Other trackers also show distinct strengths: TATrack achieves the highest Precision Rate (PR) under BC, SO, SV, and ARC, while the modality-missing tracker TMKD performs competitively under SA (similar appearance) and TC (thermal crossover).

Attribute- and Subset-based Performance on DRGBT-1K Test Set (Part 1)

Attr OSTrack TBSI TATrack BAT PURA SDSTrack MMLoRAT CKD AINet STTrack
HO 47.97/34.64 39.38/30.55 47.41/34.02 42.73/32.60 44.72/31.56 33.00/25.14 42.33/30.90 43.36/32.80 39.42/31.08 13.41/8.73
PO 39.01/32.05 36.61/30.00 39.05/31.84 36.74/30.64 36.63/29.95 32.79/26.40 38.22/30.60 37.05/30.55 36.26/30.08 7.79/8.62
LI 34.72/29.56 35.62/30.07 38.13/30.91 38.17/31.16 36.47/30.00 30.13/23.84 36.20/30.34 35.11/29.83 34.95/29.72 9.97/7.94
LR 36.17/27.70 33.56/26.44 36.93/28.40 36.06/28.27 35.57/26.41 31.23/23.65 34.85/27.55 34.17/27.46 33.59/27.13 13.49/8.01
BC 44.04/33.73 35.94/29.49 44.82/34.68 41.37/32.57 40.97/30.47 33.12/26.03 38.66/30.40 39.56/31.82 36.25/30.04 15.47/9.37
HI 33.41/24.90 31.51/22.72 28.56/22.22 29.78/20.53 24.43/18.97 25.61/17.75 24.14/18.17 34.72/24.54 26.51/20.06 4.46/6.08
SA 40.91/32.99 37.60/30.84 39.85/31.74 40.47/32.64 38.92/29.38 29.22/23.85 37.54/29.63 37.97/31.33 35.31/30.12 12.25/9.16
FL 35.82/25.15 34.22/24.77 36.98/26.96 34.56/24.87 32.62/22.86 27.21/20.44 34.55/24.96 34.05/25.05 32.17/23.76 6.69/6.55
SO 41.10/30.99 36.97/28.83 42.33/31.75 38.21/29.49 38.40/27.96 32.29/24.31 38.84/29.13 38.22/29.53 35.90/28.35 14.88/8.41
FM 38.39/32.59 37.32/32.06 39.95/33.64 40.33/34.22 38.17/31.84 31.42/26.67 36.70/31.83 37.27/32.24 36.05/31.54 5.79/9.19
OV 16.78/15.26 14.25/13.48 16.06/14.45 17.90/14.61 18.90/15.78 12.41/11.62 16.76/14.98 16.81/14.24 15.40/13.80 7.27/7.05
SV 40.48/32.36 36.97/30.34 41.62/33.22 39.21/31.78 39.22/30.43 32.83/26.18 38.74/30.94 38.10/31.27 36.69/30.32 11.54/8.79
CM 41.00/34.23 38.34/33.05 42.60/35.59 44.45/36.67 39.91/31.59 35.05/28.75 37.16/31.96 40.46/34.05 40.62/34.15 6.10/9.42
TC 25.77/21.71 24.86/20.57 27.99/22.06 25.22/20.94 29.84/22.53 19.93/15.83 31.42/23.87 26.77/22.23 23.78/19.91 4.50/7.26
ARC 39.49/31.77 35.95/29.81 41.19/32.96 37.74/30.94 38.07/29.83 32.04/25.62 37.79/30.37 37.11/30.62 35.80/29.73 11.09/8.56
MVO 77.25/54.24 65.01/48.22 78.72/56.21 69.83/52.08 70.42/49.35 51.20/36.79 69.09/50.30 69.34/51.29 64.67/48.24 21.01/11.41
PVO 35.12/30.14 35.71/30.29 36.97/30.67 37.02/31.09 37.74/29.91 35.24/27.70 35.81/30.06 36.11/30.86 35.53/30.64 11.11/8.46
CV 30.19/25.36 28.32/24.18 30.92/25.76 29.55/24.65 29.75/24.18 26.34/21.86 29.89/24.55 28.72/24.42 28.20/24.12 8.92/8.00

Attribute- and Subset-based Performance on DRGBT-1K Test Set (Part 2)

Attr CAFormer IPT FMTrack QSTNet UATrack CMRL MRTTrack TMKD SCDT GOLA
HO 39.64/30.46 37.03/27.82 40.95/30.98 38.79/29.71 46.84/33.91 46.71/34.56 40.02/30.04 46.10/34.83 24.74/18.14 45.30/34.15
PO 37.34/30.13 33.87/28.05 38.15/29.81 35.90/29.51 39.58/31.95 41.13/33.82 34.26/28.69 38.99/32.07 29.53/21.35 41.70/33.91
LI 36.47/30.22 34.38/29.14 36.53/29.74 34.23/28.89 37.26/30.29 36.65/30.29 35.38/29.39 35.74/30.30 28.76/22.87 37.43/31.35
LR 35.92/27.62 34.71/26.32 35.87/27.14 33.63/26.58 37.42/28.31 37.91/29.46 35.04/27.48 36.42/28.17 30.45/20.74 37.55/29.26
BC 38.08/30.92 38.84/29.55 40.19/30.93 37.44/29.75 41.19/31.84 40.55/32.14 37.87/30.57 43.53/33.86 27.17/20.17 43.34/33.81
HI 31.63/22.51 34.30/22.52 35.40/25.85 33.63/23.42 32.41/23.42 40.43/31.01 20.96/17.41 32.18/22.64 31.30/19.26 26.71/20.72
SA 37.95/30.81 40.22/31.04 36.90/30.43 39.57/30.78 41.40/32.49 36.83/30.74 40.82/31.47 41.67/33.64 29.55/22.39 36.81/31.07
FL 35.34/25.39 28.99/21.41 35.52/24.97 33.36/24.01 37.15/26.70 39.47/28.73 31.51/22.73 36.51/25.99 30.61/18.59 35.61/26.25
SO 38.37/29.43 36.60/27.32 38.82/28.98 37.84/29.13 41.59/31.01 39.39/30.45 35.63/27.80 40.85/31.16 29.89/21.52 41.52/31.80
FM 38.72/33.09 36.14/30.94 38.01/31.43 36.28/31.14 40.59/33.90 41.52/34.91 36.34/31.38 39.82/34.01 28.70/23.30 40.90/35.13
OV 15.28/13.49 15.94/13.79 16.79/13.27 15.50/13.06 17.21/13.87 25.47/19.35 14.70/13.86 16.79/14.90 12.48/10.71 17.55/15.29
SV 38.06/30.82 37.70/29.65 38.88/30.53 37.22/30.21 40.37/32.02 41.31/33.46 35.97/29.58 40.73/32.72 30.46/22.71 41.48/33.46
CM 41.25/34.92 41.23/32.33 37.28/31.52 39.37/32.69 40.44/33.74 46.91/39.21 37.85/32.15 44.13/36.00 28.82/23.45 42.43/35.60
TC 25.78/21.94 26.43/20.71 33.30/22.69 25.35/20.62 28.29/22.38 22.14/19.00 25.56/21.20 37.19/26.58 22.13/17.01 30.06/24.62
ARC 36.92/30.08 36.58/29.05 37.71/30.09 36.48/29.83 39.47/31.49 40.64/32.93 34.65/28.82 39.80/32.30 29.44/22.18 40.68/33.12
MVO 66.82/49.39 61.21/45.12 66.99/48.60 62.90/46.87 75.12/53.85 61.07/44.87 62.22/46.37 74.29/54.80 44.56/32.22 77.61/57.24
PVO 37.01/30.91 37.08/28.90 36.71/29.86 35.60/30.38 35.76/30.15 42.90/35.96 35.61/29.91 37.91/31.40 35.87/28.29 36.25/30.93
CV 29.35/24.51 29.90/24.25 30.48/24.40 29.43/24.42 30.63/25.13 34.61/28.46 28.05/23.88 30.52/25.42 23.15/16.70 31.45/26.12

Qualitative Results

Qualitative tracking results of different methods on DRGBT-1K


8. UGVT-1K: UAV-Ground Collaborative Visual Tracking Benchmark

As a derivative of DRGBT-1K, we also release UGVT-1K — a UAV-Ground collaborative RGB-only tracking benchmark. UGVT-1K contains the same cross-platform sequences (split into 800 sequences for training and 245 for testing) but uses only the visible (RGB) modality, enabling research on multi-view visual tracking without thermal data.

UGVT1K: UAV-Ground collaborative visual tracking samples

License

This dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).