External_Stakeholder_Registry.md
May 24, 2026 Β· View on GitHub
π€ Hack23 AB β External Stakeholder Registry
π‘οΈ Strategic Authority and Community Engagement Framework
π― Professional Network Management for Cybersecurity Excellence
π Document Owner: CEO | π Version: 1.5 | π
Last Updated: 2026-01-25 (UTC)
π Review Cycle: Semi-Annual | β° Next Review: 2026-07-25
π― Purpose Statement
π’ Hack23 AB's external stakeholder registry demonstrates how π§ systematic relationship management directly enables both regulatory compliance and business innovation. Our π comprehensive stakeholder framework serves as evidence of our commitment to transparent cybersecurity leadership while ensuring rapid response capabilities during security incidents and business disruptions.
This registry establishes mandatory contact procedures with authorities and professional communities based on our π·οΈ Classification Framework and integrates with our π¨ Incident Response Plan for coordinated crisis communication.
Our commitment to transparency means this stakeholder engagement becomes a competitive differentiator, demonstrating to potential clients how proper external relationship management enables rather than constrains cybersecurity consulting excellence.
β π¨βπΌ James Pether SΓΆrling, CEO/Founder
π Purpose & Scope
Purpose
This registry establishes the framework for maintaining relationships with external authorities, regulatory bodies, and professional communities to ensure compliance, incident response coordination, and strategic business development.
Scope
This registry covers:
- All regulatory authorities per β Compliance Checklist
- All professional cybersecurity communities and memberships
- All incident response coordination channels per π¨ Incident Response Plan
- All strategic business partnership networks
Framework Compliance
- ISO 27001:2022 - A.5.5 (Contact with authorities), A.5.6 (Contact with special interest groups)
- NIST CSF 2.0 - RS.CO-01 (Response coordination with stakeholders), GV.OV-02 (External/internal context)
- CIS Controls v8.1 - 17.2 (External authority contacts), 17.3 (Communication coordination)
ποΈ Regulatory Authority Contacts
πΈπͺ Swedish National Authorities
%%{
init: {
'theme': 'base',
'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor': '#1565C0',
'primaryTextColor': '#0d47a1',
'lineColor': '#1565C0',
'secondaryColor': '#4CAF50',
'tertiaryColor': '#FF9800'
}
}
}%%
flowchart TD
subgraph NATIONAL["πΈπͺ National Authorities"]
MCF["π‘οΈ MCF<br/>Swedish Civil Defence<br/>Cybersecurity Authority"]
PTS["π‘ PTS<br/>Post & Telecom Authority<br/>NIS2 Supervision"]
IMY["π IMY<br/>Privacy Protection Authority<br/>GDPR Supervision"]
SKAT["π° Skatteverket<br/>Swedish Tax Agency<br/>Business Registration"]
end
subgraph EU["πͺπΊ EU Authorities"]
ENISA["ποΈ ENISA<br/>EU Cybersecurity Agency<br/>Strategic Guidance"]
EU_AI["π€ EC DG CONNECT<br/>AI Governance<br/>EU AI Act Implementation"]
AI_OFFICE["πͺπΊ EU AI Office<br/>AI Act Enforcement<br/>Cross-border Coordination"]
end
subgraph SERVICES["π Services & Contact"]
CYBER["π¨ Cybersecurity Incidents"]
PRIVACY["π Data Breaches"]
TAX["πΌ Business Reporting"]
TELECOM["πΆ Telecom Incidents"]
AI_INCIDENT["π€ AI Incidents"]
AI_COMPLIANCE["π AI Compliance"]
end
subgraph RESPONSE["β‘ Response Times"]
IMMEDIATE["π΄ Immediate<br/><4 hours"]
URGENT["π Urgent<br/><24 hours"]
STANDARD["π‘ Standard<br/><72 hours"]
end
MCF --> CYBER
IMY --> PRIVACY
SKAT --> TAX
PTS --> TELECOM
EU_AI --> AI_INCIDENT
AI_OFFICE --> AI_COMPLIANCE
ENISA --> CYBER
CYBER --> IMMEDIATE
PRIVACY --> URGENT
TELECOM --> URGENT
TAX --> STANDARD
AI_INCIDENT --> URGENT
AI_COMPLIANCE --> STANDARD
style MCF fill:#D32F2F
style IMY fill:#4CAF50
style PTS fill:#1565C0
style SKAT fill:#FF9800
style EU_AI fill:#7B1FA2
style AI_OFFICE fill:#7B1FA2
style ENISA fill:#7B1FA2
π‘οΈ Myndigheten fΓΆr civilt fΓΆrsvar (MCF)
Primary Role: National cybersecurity authority and incident coordination
| Contact Type | Details | Usage Context | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| π¨ Incident Reporting | CERT-SE via secure portal | Critical cybersecurity incidents | |
| π§ General Contact | cert@cert.se | Non-urgent cybersecurity matters | |
| π Emergency Hotline | Available via CERT-SE portal | Active ongoing incidents | |
| π€ Cybernode Network | cybernode@ri.se | MCF cybersecurity briefings (bi-weekly Fridays 08:30-08:50) |
Reporting Obligations:
- NIS2 Directive Implementation: Significant cybersecurity incidents affecting essential services
- National Cybersecurity Strategy: Threat intelligence sharing and coordination
- Cybernode Participation: Regular attendance at MCF digital briefings for external cybersecurity network
π Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
Primary Role: GDPR supervision and data protection authority
| Contact Type | Details | Usage Context | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| π Data Breach Notification | IMY Portal | Personal data breaches (Art. 33 GDPR) | |
| π§ General Inquiries | imy@imy.se | GDPR compliance questions | |
| π Phone Support | +46 8 657 61 00 | Urgent data protection matters |
Reporting Obligations:
- 72-hour breach notification for personal data incidents per π¨ Incident Response Plan
- Annual data protection impact assessments for high-risk processing activities
π‘ Post- och telestyrelsen (PTS)
Primary Role: NIS2 supervision for digital infrastructure providers
| Contact Type | Details | Usage Context | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| π NIS2 Reporting | PTS Portal | Significant network/information system incidents | |
| π§ General Contact | pts@pts.se | Telecom and digital service matters |
Reporting Obligations:
- NIS2 incident reporting for essential and important entities (when applicable)
- Risk management measures documentation and compliance verification
π° Skatteverket (Swedish Tax Agency)
Primary Role: Business registration, VAT, and tax compliance
| Contact Type | Details | Usage Context | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| πΌ Business Portal | Skatteverket.se | VAT reporting, business registration | |
| π Business Hotline | 0771-567 567 | Tax and business compliance questions |
Reporting Obligations:
- Monthly VAT reporting via digital portal
- Annual corporate tax returns and business activity reporting
πͺπΊ European Union Authorities
ποΈ European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA)
Primary Role: EU-wide cybersecurity coordination and guidance
| Contact Type | Details | Usage Context | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| π§ General Contact | info@enisa.europa.eu | EU cybersecurity initiatives and guidance | |
| π Threat Landscape | ENISA Threat Landscape Reports | Strategic threat intelligence |
Engagement Areas:
- EU Cybersecurity Strategy implementation and best practices
- NIS2 Directive guidance and harmonization across member states
π€ European Commission DG CONNECT - AI Governance
Primary Role: EU AI Act implementation and oversight
| Contact Type | Details | Usage Context | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| π§ AI Act Queries | AI Act Implementation Portal | EU AI Act compliance questions | |
| π¨ AI Incident Reporting | Via national competent authorities | Serious AI system incidents | |
| π Conformity Assessment | AI Office Portal | High-risk AI system notifications |
Reporting Obligations:
- AI Act Article 62: Serious incident reporting for high-risk AI systems
- Database Registration: High-risk AI system registration requirements
- Conformity Assessment: CE marking and technical documentation compliance
πͺπΊ European Artificial Intelligence Office
Primary Role: AI Act enforcement and coordination across member states
Engagement Areas:
- AI Act Guidelines and technical standards development
- Cross-border coordination for AI system oversight
- AI governance best practices sharing and harmonization
π International Authorities
πΊπΈ Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
Primary Role: International cybersecurity coordination and threat intelligence
| Contact Type | Details | Usage Context | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| π¨ Incident Reporting | CISA Incident Reporting | Significant international incidents | |
| π Threat Intelligence | CISA Advisories | Proactive threat monitoring |
Engagement Areas:
- International cybersecurity cooperation and threat sharing
- Cloud security best practices for AWS-based infrastructure
π€ Partnership on AI (PAI)
Engagement Status: Observer - Monitoring AI governance and ethics developments
Business Impact:
- βοΈ Compliance Awareness: Proactive awareness of evolving AI governance requirements
- π― Risk Management: Evidence-based AI risk assessment insights
- π Industry Knowledge: Understanding of responsible AI development practices
π‘οΈ AI Security Alliance
Engagement Status: Observer - Monitoring AI security developments
Business Impact:
- π‘οΈ Security Awareness: AI-specific threat protection knowledge
- β‘ Early Warning: Understanding of emerging AI security vulnerabilities
- π― Industry Knowledge: Advanced AI security insights for client consulting
π Open Source Program Offices (OSPO) & Networks
π OSPO Alliance
Membership Status: Active Member - Official Member Announcement
| Engagement Type | Details | Business Value | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| π€ OSPO OnRamp Meetings | Bi-monthly 90-minute knowledge exchange sessions (3rd Friday, 10:30-12:00 CE(S)T) | Learn OSPO setup fundamentals and best practices | |
| π Part 1: Presentations | Recorded presentations on OSPO experiences and lessons learned | Access to community knowledge and implementation guidance | |
| π Part 2: Chatham House Discussion | Protected environment for open challenge sharing (not recorded) | Safe space for discussing organizational open source challenges | |
| π Alliance Participation | European OSPO network membership and collaboration | Strategic alignment with European open source initiatives |
Member Since: November 25, 2025
OSPO OnRamp Details:
- π― Purpose: Low-threshold entry point for organizations setting up Open Source Program Offices
- π Schedule: Every other month (bi-monthly) on 3rd Friday, 10:30-12:00 CE(S)T
- π Format:
- Part 1 (Recorded): Expert presentations on OSPO setup, experiences, lessons learned
- Part 2 (Chatham House Rule): Open discussion of challenges and problems (not recorded)
- π Meeting Link: OSPO OnRamp Sessions
- π Past Recordings: Available at OSPO OnRamp Archive
Business Impact:
- π‘ Innovation Enablement: Access to European OSPO best practices and implementation guidance
- π€ Partnership Value: Network with organizations establishing open source programs
- π Competitive Advantage: Early adopter positioning in Swedish OSPO landscape
- π Decision Quality: Evidence-based open source governance insights
- π Market Expansion: Connection to European open source ecosystem
πΈπͺ Swedish OSPO Network (NOSAD)
Engagement Status: Active Participant - Network Information
Network Focus: Swedish Open Source Program Offices and organizations establishing open source governance
Network Structure:
- Coordination Group: RISE (Johan LinΓ₯ker), Ericsson (Jimmy Ahlberg), Sony (Alin Jerpelea), Sundsvalls kommun (Per Persson)
- Recent Workshop Topics: CRA & Cloud/AI Legislation (Husqvarna), Open Source Intake (Sony), AI & OSS (Volvo Cars), SBOM & Supply Chain (Scania)
- Member Organizations: Public and private sector organizations with OSPOs or working with open source
- Operating Model: Chatham House Rule for both workshops and mailing list to ensure open, safe knowledge sharing
- Contact: johan.linaker@ri.se for network participation inquiries
Key Contacts:
- Primary Contact: Johan LinΓ₯ker (RISE) - johan.linaker@ri.se
- Network Context: Includes OSPO leads from Ericsson, Sony, Volvo Cars, Scania, IKEA, Husqvarna, and former leads from Polestar, Wirelesscar
- Geographic Scope: National Swedish network with workshops in Gothenburg, Stockholm (Kista), Lund, MalmΓΆ, SΓΆdertΓ€lje, Huskvarna
- Participation Strategy: Selective attendance at workshops based on topic relevance, geographic proximity, and business value
Business Impact:
- πΈπͺ Local Market Intelligence: Direct access to Swedish OSPO landscape including automotive, telecom, retail, and public sector
- π€ Professional Network: Connection to coordination group and OSPO practitioners from leading Swedish organizations
- πΌ Client Opportunities: Visibility among organizations actively establishing or operating OSPOs
- π Compliance Awareness: Swedish implementation of CRA, AI Act, and SBOM requirements through peer learning
- π Thought Leadership: Positioning through participation in national OSPO knowledge development and best practice sharing
π€ Professional Communities & Special Interest Groups
π‘οΈ Cybersecurity Professional Organizations
%%{
init: {
'theme': 'base',
'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor': '#4CAF50',
'primaryTextColor': '#2e7d32',
'lineColor': '#4CAF50',
'secondaryColor': '#1565C0',
'tertiaryColor': '#FF9800'
}
}
}%%
graph TD
subgraph INTL["π International Organizations"]
ISACA["π ISACA<br/>Information Systems Audit<br/>CISM Certification - MEMBER"]
ISC2["π‘οΈ ISC2<br/>Information Security<br/>CISSP Certification - MEMBER"]
SIGSEC["π Special Interest Group Security<br/>Academic Research Network - MEMBER"]
PAI["π€ Partnership on AI<br/>AI Governance & Ethics<br/>Observer - Monitoring Only"]
AI_SEC["π‘οΈ AI Security Alliance<br/>AI-Specific Security<br/>Observer - Monitoring Only"]
OSPO_ALLIANCE["π OSPO Alliance<br/>European OSPO Network<br/>OSPO OnRamp - MEMBER"]
end
subgraph NORDIC["πΈπͺ Nordic/Swedish Networks"]
CYBERNODE["π€ Cybernode.se<br/>Swedish Cybersecurity Network<br/>AI & Cybersecurity Working Group - MEMBER"]
MCF_NET["π‘ MCF External Network<br/>Government Cybersecurity Briefings"]
NOSAD["πΈπͺ Swedish OSPO Network<br/>NOSAD Open Source Community<br/>Gothenburg Events - PARTICIPANT"]
end
subgraph BENEFITS["πΌ Professional Benefits"]
EDUCATION["π Continuing Education"]
NETWORKING["π€ Professional Network"]
INTELLIGENCE["π Threat Intelligence"]
COMPLIANCE["β
Best Practices"]
AI_MONITORING["π€ AI Intelligence Monitoring"]
OSPO_KNOWLEDGE["π Open Source Governance"]
end
ISACA --> EDUCATION
ISC2 --> EDUCATION
SIGSEC --> INTELLIGENCE
CYBERNODE --> NETWORKING
MCF_NET --> INTELLIGENCE
PAI -.-> AI_MONITORING
AI_SEC -.-> AI_MONITORING
OSPO_ALLIANCE --> OSPO_KNOWLEDGE
NOSAD --> NETWORKING
NOSAD --> OSPO_KNOWLEDGE
EDUCATION --> COMPLIANCE
NETWORKING --> COMPLIANCE
INTELLIGENCE --> COMPLIANCE
AI_MONITORING -.-> COMPLIANCE
OSPO_KNOWLEDGE --> COMPLIANCE
style ISACA fill:#1565C0
style ISC2 fill:#4CAF50
style CYBERNODE fill:#FF9800
style SIGSEC fill:#D32F2F
style PAI fill:#9E9E9E
style AI_SEC fill:#9E9E9E
style OSPO_ALLIANCE fill:#2E7D32
style NOSAD fill:#4CAF50
π ISACA (Information Systems Audit and Control Association)
Membership Status: Active - James Pether SΓΆrling (CISM Certified)
Business Impact:
- π Competitive Advantage: CISM certification demonstrates enterprise-grade security management expertise
- π Compliance Posture: Access to latest governance frameworks and audit methodologies
- π€ Trust Enhancement: Professional credibility with enterprise clients and partners
π‘οΈ (ISC)Β² - International Information System Security Certification Consortium
Membership Status: Active - James Pether SΓΆrling (CISSP Certified)
- π‘ Innovation Enablement: Access to cutting-edge security research and methodologies
- π‘οΈ Risk Reduction: Proven security expertise across all technical domains
- πΌ Partnership Value: Global recognition and credibility in cybersecurity consulting
π Special Interest Group Security (sigsecurity.org)
Membership Status: Active
Business Impact:
- π‘ Innovation Enablement: Early access to emerging security research and trends
- π Competitive Advantage: Thought leadership through academic collaboration
- π Decision Quality: Research-based approach to security consulting methodologies
πΈπͺ Swedish Cybersecurity Networks
π€ Cybernode.se - Swedish Cybersecurity Network
Membership Status: Active Member - Listed on Members Page
Business Impact:
- π€ Partnership Value: Direct access to Swedish cybersecurity market and potential clients
- π Decision Quality: Local threat intelligence and regulatory updates
- π‘ Innovation Enablement: AI and cybersecurity integration expertise
- π‘οΈ Risk Reduction: Government-coordinated threat awareness and response
MCF Briefing Schedule:
- π Schedule: Every other Friday, even weeks, 08:30-08:50
- π§ Access: Contact cybernode@ri.se for meeting invitations
- π Content: MCF cybersecurity situational awareness, two-week threat landscape summary
- π Follow-up: Summary distribution post-meeting to all participants
π¨ Incident Response Coordination
π Authority Notification Matrix
Based on π¨ Incident Response Plan incident classification:
%%{
init: {
'theme': 'base',
'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor': '#FF9800',
'primaryTextColor': '#F57C00',
'lineColor': '#ff9800',
'secondaryColor': '#4CAF50',
'tertiaryColor': '#1565C0'
}
}
}%%
flowchart TD
subgraph INCIDENT["π¨ Incident Classification"]
CRITICAL["π΄ Critical<br/>National Security Impact"]
HIGH["π High<br/>Significant Business Impact"]
MEDIUM["π‘ Medium<br/>Moderate Impact"]
LOW["π’ Low<br/>Minimal Impact"]
AI_SERIOUS["π€ AI Serious<br/>High-Risk AI System Incident"]
end
subgraph AUTHORITIES["ποΈ Authority Notification"]
MCF_CERT["π‘οΈ MCF/CERT-SE<br/>Immediate"]
IMY_GDPR["π IMY<br/>72 hours"]
PTS_NIS["π‘ PTS<br/>24 hours"]
ENISA["πͺπΊ ENISA<br/>Coordination"]
EU_AI_AUTH["π€ EU AI Authorities<br/>Via National Competent Authority"]
end
subgraph COMMUNITY["π€ Community Notification"]
CYBERNODE_ALERT["π€ Cybernode<br/>Threat Sharing"]
ISACA_REPORT["π ISACA<br/>Lessons Learned"]
ACADEMIC["π Academic<br/>Research Share"]
end
subgraph MONITORING["π Intelligence Monitoring"]
AI_SEC_MONITOR["π‘οΈ AI Security Alliance<br/>Threat Intelligence Monitoring"]
PAI_MONITOR["π€ Partnership on AI<br/>Incident Pattern Analysis"]
end
CRITICAL --> MCF_CERT
CRITICAL --> IMY_GDPR
CRITICAL --> PTS_NIS
CRITICAL --> ENISA
HIGH --> MCF_CERT
HIGH --> IMY_GDPR
HIGH --> CYBERNODE_ALERT
MEDIUM --> IMY_GDPR
MEDIUM --> CYBERNODE_ALERT
LOW --> ISACA_REPORT
LOW --> ACADEMIC
AI_SERIOUS --> EU_AI_AUTH
AI_SERIOUS --> MCF_CERT
AI_SERIOUS -.-> AI_SEC_MONITOR
AI_SERIOUS -.-> PAI_MONITOR
style CRITICAL fill:#D32F2F
style HIGH fill:#FFC107
style AI_SERIOUS fill:#7B1FA2
style MEDIUM fill:#FFC107
style LOW fill:#4CAF50
Critical Incident Notification (π΄)
Timeframe: Immediate (β€4 hours)
| Authority | Notification Method | Information Required | Follow-up Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| π‘οΈ MCF/CERT-SE | Secure portal + phone | Full incident details, impact assessment | Technical coordination, threat intelligence sharing |
| π IMY | GDPR portal + email | Personal data breach scope, affected individuals | Formal breach notification, corrective measures |
| π‘ PTS | NIS2 portal | Network/system impact, service disruption | Regulatory compliance verification |
| πͺπΊ ENISA | Via MCF coordination | Cross-border implications | EU-wide threat coordination |
High Incident Notification (π )
Timeframe: Urgent (β€24 hours)
| Authority | Notification Method | Information Required | Follow-up Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| π‘οΈ MCF/CERT-SE | Secure portal | Incident summary, potential national impact | Threat assessment, guidance |
| π IMY | GDPR portal | Data protection impact assessment | Compliance monitoring |
| π€ Cybernode | Network alert | Threat indicators, protection measures | Community threat sharing |
π Communication Escalation Process
%%{
init: {
'theme': 'base',
'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor': '#1565C0',
'primaryTextColor': '#1565C0',
'lineColor': '#1565C0',
'secondaryColor': '#4CAF50',
'tertiaryColor': '#FFC107'
}
}
}%%
sequenceDiagram
participant CEO as π¨βπΌ CEO
participant SYSTEMS as π» Systems
participant MCF as π‘οΈ MCF/CERT-SE
participant IMY as π IMY
participant EU_AI as π€ EU AI Authorities
participant COMMUNITY as π€ Community
SYSTEMS->>CEO: π¨ Incident Detected
CEO->>CEO: π Classify Incident Severity & Type
alt Critical/High Incident
CEO->>MCF: π Immediate Notification
MCF-->>CEO: π Incident Reference Number
CEO->>IMY: π§ GDPR Assessment
IMY-->>CEO: β
Compliance Confirmation
alt AI System Incident
CEO->>EU_AI: π€ AI Act Article 62 Reporting
EU_AI-->>CEO: π AI Incident Case Number
end
CEO->>COMMUNITY: π‘ Threat Intelligence Sharing
COMMUNITY-->>CEO: π€ Support Coordination
else Medium/Low Incident
CEO->>CEO: π Document Internally
CEO->>COMMUNITY: π Lessons Learned Sharing
end
CEO->>CEO: π Update Stakeholder Registry
π Stakeholder Engagement Matrix
π― Strategic Relationship Management
Based on π·οΈ Classification Framework stakeholder analysis:
π Annual Engagement Calendar
π Registry Maintenance & Updates
π Update Procedures
Quarterly Review Process
- π Contact Verification: Verify all authority contact details remain current
- π€ Relationship Assessment: Evaluate engagement effectiveness and business value
- π Performance Metrics: Review response times and coordination effectiveness
- π― Strategic Alignment: Ensure stakeholder relationships support business objectives
Immediate Update Triggers
- π¨ Incident Response Events: Update based on actual incident coordination experience
- π Regulatory Changes: New authorities, changed reporting requirements
- π€ Network Changes: New memberships, organizational restructuring
- π Business Strategy Evolution: Changing business focus or market expansion
π Key Performance Indicators
| Metric Category | KPI | Target | Measurement Method | Review Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| π¨ Incident Response | Authority notification time | <4 hours critical | Incident response logs | Per incident |
| π€ Professional Engagement | CPE requirements compliance | 100% on time | Certification tracking | Annual |
| πΈπͺ Network Participation | MCF briefing attendance | >80% sessions | Meeting logs | Quarterly |
| π Stakeholder Satisfaction | Relationship effectiveness | High value rating | Annual survey | Annual |
| π Registry Currency | Contact accuracy | 100% verified | Quarterly validation | Quarterly |
π Business Value Tracking
Competitive Advantage Metrics
- π Certification Maintenance: CISM/CISSP currency demonstrates expertise
- π€ Network Influence: Active participation in national cybersecurity initiatives
- π‘ Innovation Leadership: AI & cybersecurity working group contributions
- π Compliance Excellence: Proactive regulatory relationship management
Risk Reduction Metrics
- β‘ Response Coordination: Effective incident authority coordination
- π Threat Intelligence: Early warning through professional networks
- π‘οΈ Regulatory Compliance: Maintained good standing with all authorities
- π Business Continuity: Stakeholder support during crisis events
π Related Documents
π― Strategic & Governance
- π― Information Security Strategy β AI-first operations, Pentagon framework, and strategic stakeholder engagement direction
- π Information Security Policy β Overall governance framework with AI-First Operations Governance
- π€ AI Policy β AI-assisted stakeholder communication and relationship management
- π·οΈ Classification Framework β Business impact analysis and stakeholder influence assessment
- π Risk Register β Risk identification including regulatory and stakeholder relationship risks
- β Compliance Checklist β Regulatory compliance tracking and authority relationship requirements
π Security Policies & Controls
- π€ Third Party Management β Supplier and partner relationship management procedures
- π€ Partnership Framework β Strategic partnership development and management
- π Open Source Policy β Open source governance and community engagement
βοΈ Operational Integration
- π¨ Incident Response Plan β Detailed incident coordination procedures and authority notification requirements
- π» Asset Register β Complete asset inventory including stakeholder-dependent systems
- π Security Metrics β Performance measurement including stakeholder relationship KPIs
- π Business Continuity Plan β Crisis communication and stakeholder coordination during disruptions
- π ISMS Transparency Plan β Public disclosure strategy and stakeholder communication
π Document Control:
β
Approved by: James Pether SΓΆrling, CEO
π€ Distribution: Public
π·οΈ Classification:
π
Effective Date: 2026-01-25
β° Next Review: 2026-07-25
π― Framework Compliance: