noble-post-quantum

Auditable & minimal JS implementation of post-quantum public-key cryptography.

• 🔒 Auditable
• 🔻 Tree-shakeable: unused code is excluded from your builds
• 🔍 Reliable: tests ensure correctness
• 🦾 ML-KEM & CRYSTALS-Kyber: lattice-based KEM from FIPS-203
• 🔋 ML-DSA & CRYSTALS-Dilithium: lattice-based signatures from FIPS-204
• 🐈 SLH-DSA & SPHINCS+: hash-based Winternitz signatures from FIPS-205
• 🦅 Falcon: lattice-based signatures from Falcon Round 3
• 🍡 Hybrid algorithms, combining classic & post-quantum: Concrete, XWing, KitchenSink
• 🪶 16KB (gzipped) for everything, including bundled hashes & curves

This library belongs to noble cryptography

noble cryptography — high-security, easily auditable set of contained cryptographic libraries and tools.

• Zero or minimal dependencies
• Highly readable TypeScript / JS code
• PGP-signed releases and transparent NPM builds
• All libraries: ciphers, curves, hashes, post-quantum, 5kb secp256k1 / ed25519
• WASM version: awasm-noble
• Check out the homepage for reading resources, documentation, and apps built with noble

Usage

npm install @noble/post-quantum

deno add jsr:@noble/post-quantum

We support all major platforms and runtimes. For React Native, you may need a polyfill for getRandomValues. A standalone file noble-post-quantum.js is also available.

// import * from '@noble/post-quantum'; // Error: use sub-imports instead
import { ml_kem512, ml_kem768, ml_kem1024 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-kem.js';
import { ml_dsa44, ml_dsa65, ml_dsa87 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-dsa.js';
import {
  slh_dsa_sha2_128f,
  slh_dsa_sha2_128s,
  slh_dsa_sha2_192f,
  slh_dsa_sha2_192s,
  slh_dsa_sha2_256f,
  slh_dsa_sha2_256s,
  slh_dsa_shake_128f,
  slh_dsa_shake_128s,
  slh_dsa_shake_192f,
  slh_dsa_shake_192s,
  slh_dsa_shake_256f,
  slh_dsa_shake_256s,
} from '@noble/post-quantum/slh-dsa.js';
import {
  falcon512, falcon512padded, falcon1024, falcon1024padded,
} from '@noble/post-quantum/falcon.js';
import {
  ml_kem768_x25519, ml_kem768_p256, ml_kem1024_p384,
  KitchenSink_ml_kem768_x25519, XWing,
  QSF_ml_kem768_p256, QSF_ml_kem1024_p384,
} from '@noble/post-quantum/hybrid.js';

• ML-KEM / Kyber
• ML-DSA / Dilithium
• SLH-DSA / SPHINCS+
• Falcon
• hybrid: XWing, KitchenSink and others
• What should I use?
• Security
• Speed
• Contributing & testing
• License

ML-KEM / Kyber shared secrets

import { ml_kem512, ml_kem768, ml_kem1024 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-kem.js';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/post-quantum/utils.js';
import { notDeepStrictEqual } from 'node:assert';
const seed = randomBytes(64); // seed is optional
const aliceKeys = ml_kem768.keygen(seed);
const { cipherText, sharedSecret: bobShared } = ml_kem768.encapsulate(aliceKeys.publicKey);
const aliceShared = ml_kem768.decapsulate(cipherText, aliceKeys.secretKey);

// Warning: Can be MITM-ed
const malloryKeys = ml_kem768.keygen();
const malloryShared = ml_kem768.decapsulate(cipherText, malloryKeys.secretKey); // No error!
notDeepStrictEqual(aliceShared, malloryShared); // Different key!

Lattice-based key encapsulation mechanism, defined in FIPS-203 (website, repo). Can be used as follows:

1. Alice generates secret & public keys, then sends publicKey to Bob
2. Bob generates shared secret for Alice publicKey. bobShared never leaves Bob system and is unknown to other parties
3. Alice gets and decrypts cipherText from Bob Now, both Alice and Bob have same sharedSecret key without exchanging in plainText: aliceShared == bobShared.

There are some concerns with regards to security: see djb blog and mailing list. Old, incompatible version (Kyber) is not provided. Open an issue if you need it.

ML-DSA / Dilithium signatures

import { ml_dsa44, ml_dsa65, ml_dsa87 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-dsa.js';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/post-quantum/utils.js';
const seed = randomBytes(32); // seed is optional
const keys = ml_dsa65.keygen(seed);
const msg = new TextEncoder().encode('hello noble');
const sig = ml_dsa65.sign(msg, keys.secretKey);
const isValid = ml_dsa65.verify(sig, msg, keys.publicKey);

Lattice-based digital signature algorithm, defined in FIPS-204 (website, repo). The internals are similar to ML-KEM, but keys and params are different.

SLH-DSA / SPHINCS+ signatures

import {
  slh_dsa_sha2_128f as sph,
  slh_dsa_sha2_128s,
  slh_dsa_sha2_192f,
  slh_dsa_sha2_192s,
  slh_dsa_sha2_256f,
  slh_dsa_sha2_256s,
  slh_dsa_shake_128f,
  slh_dsa_shake_128s,
  slh_dsa_shake_192f,
  slh_dsa_shake_192s,
  slh_dsa_shake_256f,
  slh_dsa_shake_256s,
} from '@noble/post-quantum/slh-dsa.js';

const keys2 = sph.keygen();
const msg2 = new TextEncoder().encode('hello noble');
const sig2 = sph.sign(msg2, keys2.secretKey);
const isValid2 = sph.verify(sig2, msg2, keys2.publicKey);

Hash-based digital signature algorithm, defined in FIPS-205 (website, repo). We implement spec v3.1 with FIPS adjustments.

• sha2 vs shake (sha3): indicates internal hash function used
• 128 / 192 / 256: indicates security level in bits
• s / f: indicates small vs fast trade-off

SLH-DSA is slow: see benchmarks for key size & speed.

Falcon signatures

import { falcon512, falcon1024 } from '@noble/post-quantum/falcon.js';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/post-quantum/utils.js';
const seed3 = randomBytes(48); // seed is optional
const keys3 = falcon512.keygen(seed3);
const msg3 = new TextEncoder().encode('hello noble');
const sig3 = falcon512.sign(msg3, keys3.secretKey);
const isValid3 = falcon512.verify(sig3, msg3, keys3.publicKey);

Lattice-based digital signature algorithm, submitted to NIST PQC Round 3 (website, Round 3 submissions).

• falcon512, falcon1024: variable-length detached signatures
• falcon512padded, falcon1024padded: fixed-length detached signatures
• attached.seal(...) / attached.open(...): attached-signature API for Round 3 vectors and interop

hybrid: XWing, KitchenSink and others

import {
  ml_kem768_x25519, ml_kem768_p256, ml_kem1024_p384,
  KitchenSink_ml_kem768_x25519, XWing,
  QSF_ml_kem768_p256, QSF_ml_kem1024_p384,
} from '@noble/post-quantum/hybrid.js';

Hybrid submodule combine post-quantum algorithms with elliptic curve cryptography:

• ml_kem768_x25519: ML-KEM-768 + X25519 (CG Framework, same as XWing)
• ml_kem768_p256: ML-KEM-768 + P-256 (CG Framework)
• ml_kem1024_p384: ML-KEM-1024 + P-384 (CG Framework)
• KitchenSink_ml_kem768_x25519: ML-KEM-768 + X25519 with HKDF-SHA256 combiner
• QSF_ml_kem768_p256: ML-KEM-768 + P-256 (QSF construction)
• QSF_ml_kem1024_p384: ML-KEM-1024 + P-384 (QSF construction)

The following spec drafts are matched:

• irtf-cfrg-hybrid-kems-07
• irtf-cfrg-concrete-hybrid-kems-02
• connolly-cfrg-xwing-kem-09
• tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00-03

What should I use?

	Speed	Key size	Sig size	Created in	Popularized in	Post-quantum?
RSA	Normal	256B - 2KB	256B - 2KB	1970s	1990s	No
ECC	Normal	32 - 256B	48 - 128B	1980s	2010s	No
ML-KEM	Fast	1.6 - 31KB	1KB	1990s	2020s	Yes
ML-DSA	Normal	1.3 - 2.5KB	2.5 - 4.5KB	1990s	2020s	Yes
SLH-DSA	Slow	32 - 128B	17 - 50KB	1970s	2020s	Yes
FN-DSA	Slow	0.9 - 1.8KB	0.6 - 1.2KB	1990s	2020s	Yes

We suggest to use ECC + ML-KEM for key agreement, ECC + SLH-DSA for signatures.

ML-KEM and ML-DSA are lattice-based. SLH-DSA is hash-based, which means it is built on top of older, more conservative primitives. NIST guidance for security levels:

• Category 3 (~AES-192): ML-KEM-768, ML-DSA-65, SLH-DSA-192
• Category 5 (~AES-256): ML-KEM-1024, ML-DSA-87, SLH-DSA-256

NIST recommends to use cat-3+, while australian ASD only allows cat-5 after 2030.

It's also useful to check out NIST SP 800-131Ar3 for "Transitioning the Use of Cryptographic Algorithms and Key Lengths".

For hashes, use SHA512 or SHA3-512 (not SHA256); and for ciphers ensure AES-256 or ChaCha.

Security

The library has not been independently audited yet.

• at version 0.6.1, in Apr 2026, it was audited by ourselves (self-audited)
  • Scope: everything
  • Changes since audit

If you see anything unusual: investigate and report.

Constant-timeness

There is no protection against side-channel attacks. We actively research how to provide this property for post-quantum algorithms in JS. Keep in mind that even hardware versions ML-KEM are vulnerable.

Supply chain security

• Commits are signed with PGP keys to prevent forgery. Be sure to verify the commit signatures
• Releases are made transparently through token-less GitHub CI and Trusted Publishing. Be sure to verify the provenance logs for authenticity.
• Rare releasing is practiced to minimize the need for re-audits by end-users.
• Dependencies are minimized and strictly pinned to reduce supply-chain risk.
  • We use as few dependencies as possible.
  • Version ranges are locked, and changes are checked with npm-diff.
• Dev dependencies are excluded from end-user installs; they're only used for development and build steps.

For this package, there are 2 dependencies; and a few dev dependencies:

• noble-hashes provides cryptographic hashing functionality, used internally in every algorithm
• noble-curves provides elliptic curve cryptography for hybrid algorithms
• jsbt is used for benchmarking / testing / build tooling and developed by the same author
• prettier, fast-check and typescript are used for code quality / test generation / ts compilation

Randomness

We rely on the built-in crypto.getRandomValues, which is considered a cryptographically secure PRNG.

Browsers have had weaknesses in the past - and could again - but implementing a userspace CSPRNG is even worse, as there’s no reliable userspace source of high-quality entropy.

Contributing & testing

• npm install && npm run build && npm test will build the code and run tests.
• npm run lint / npm run format will run linter / fix linter issues.
• npm run bench will run benchmarks
• npm run build:release will build single file

Check out github.com/paulmillr/guidelines for general coding practices and rules.

See paulmillr.com/noble for useful resources, articles, documentation and demos related to the library.

Speed

npm run bench

Noble is the fastest JS implementation of post-quantum algorithms.

There is experimental awasm git branch, which uses WASM-based awasm-noble for hashing. It has 80% faster ML-KEM, 30% faster ML-DSA, 2.3x faster SLH-DSA-SHA256, 15x faster SLH-DSA-SHAKE. The SHAKE-s version is much more usable in WASM variant. Try it out!

Benchmarks on Apple M4 (operations/sec, higher is better):

Primitive	Keygen	Signing	Verification	Shared secret
ML-KEM-768	4661			4089
ML-DSA65	669	271	565
Falcon512	14	749	2160
SLH-DSA-SHA2-192f	235	8	159
Pre-quantum x/ed25519	12648	6157	1255	1981

SLH-DSA (s has 2x shorter signatures; SHAKE is very slow):

	keygen	sign	verify
sha2_128f	2ms	65ms	4ms
shake_128f	10ms	248ms	15ms
sha2_192f	4ms	117ms	6ms
shake_192f	15ms	407ms	22ms
sha2_256f	11ms	250ms	6ms
shake_256f	42ms	840ms	22ms
sha2_128s	190ms	1350ms	1ms
shake_128s	700ms	5264ms	5ms
sha2_192s	272ms	2900ms	2ms
shake_192s	1000ms	9100ms	7ms
sha2_256s	190ms	2600ms	3ms
shake_256s	672ms	8070ms	3ms

Key and signature sizes:

Variant	Public key	Secret key	Signature / Ciphertext
ML-KEM-512	800	1632	768
ML-KEM-768	1184	2400	1088
ML-KEM-1024	1568	3168	1568
ML-DSA-44	1312	2560	2420
ML-DSA-65	1952	4032	3309
ML-DSA-87	2592	4896	4627
Falcon512	897	1281	666
Falcon1024	1793	2305	1280
SLH-DSA-128f	32	64	17088
SLH-DSA-128s	32	64	7856
SLH-DSA-192f	48	96	35664
SLH-DSA-192s	48	96	16224
SLH-DSA-256f	64	128	49856
SLH-DSA-256s	64	128	29792

License

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2024 Paul Miller (https://paulmillr.com)

See LICENSE file.