control-mapping.md
April 28, 2026 · View on GitHub
🗺️ CIA Triad Control Mapping
Comprehensive Framework-to-Policy Mapping for Security Controls
Demonstrating Traceability from Industry Standards to ISMS Implementation
Document Owner: Security Team | Version: 2.0 | Last Updated: 2025-01-10 (UTC)
Review Cycle: Quarterly | Next Review: 2026-07-28
🎯 Purpose Statement
This document provides comprehensive traceability from technical security controls across the CIA triad to industry-standard compliance frameworks and Hack23 AB's Information Security Management System (ISMS) policies.
Our approach to control mapping demonstrates cybersecurity consulting excellence by connecting abstract compliance requirements to concrete policy implementations, enabling customers to verify that security controls satisfy multiple regulatory frameworks simultaneously while aligning with operational procedures.
This mapping serves as a reference implementation showing how compliance frameworks translate into actionable security practices, supporting audit readiness, regulatory compliance, and continuous security improvement.
— Security Team, Hack23 AB
📚 Framework Reference Guide
This document maps technical controls to:
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 - Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 - Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection
- CIS Controls v8.1 - Center for Internet Security Critical Security Controls
- Hack23 AB ISMS - Public Information Security Management System
🔗 ISMS Policy Framework Integration
All controls are mapped to specific ISMS policies to demonstrate operational implementation:
| 🏛️ Policy Domain | 📋 ISMS Policy | 🎯 Primary Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 🔐 Core Security | Information Security Policy | Overall security governance framework |
| 🔑 Identity & Access | Access Control Policy | Authentication, authorization, privilege management |
| 🔒 Data Protection | Cryptography Policy | Encryption standards, key management |
| 🌐 Infrastructure | Network Security Policy | Network controls, perimeter security |
| 🏷️ Information Management | Data Classification Policy | Data handling, classification levels |
| 🛠️ Development | Secure Development Policy | SDLC security, testing requirements |
| 📝 Change Control | Change Management | Configuration management, controlled changes |
| 🔍 Security Testing | Vulnerability Management | Security scanning, coordinated disclosure |
| 🚨 Response & Recovery | Incident Response Plan | Security event handling, communication |
| 🔄 Continuity | Business Continuity Plan | Business resilience, recovery strategies |
| 🆘 Recovery | Disaster Recovery Plan | Technical recovery procedures |
| 💾 Backup | Backup Recovery Policy | Data protection, backup validation |
| 📊 Risk Management | Risk Assessment Methodology | Risk evaluation framework |
| ⚠️ Risk Tracking | Risk Register | Risk identification, treatment |
| 💻 Asset Management | Asset Register | Asset inventory, ownership |
| 🤝 Supply Chain | Third Party Management | Supplier risk, vendor assessment |
1. 🔄 Availability Controls
📊 Control Mapping Overview
Availability controls ensure systems and data are accessible when needed, mapped to business continuity and disaster recovery ISMS policies.
Basic Level (Backup & Restore)
🎯 Business Impact: Manual recovery, ~95% uptime, suitable for non-critical systems
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 5% / OPEX 5%
📋 ISMS Policies: 💾 Backup Recovery Policy, 🔄 Business Continuity Plan
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual backup procedures | CP-9 System Backup (Basic) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-9: Implement backup processes | A.12.3.1 Information backup | CIS 11.1, 11.2 | 💾 Backup Recovery Policy |
| Basic recovery documentation | CP-2 Contingency Plan (Low) | Recover.Recovery Planning.RC.RP: Recovery processes and procedures are executed and maintained | A.17.1.1 Planning information security continuity | CIS 11.4 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
| Single Points of Failure identification | CP-2(8) Contingency Plan - Identify Critical Assets | Identify.Business Environment.ID.BE-5: Resilience requirements to support delivery of critical services are established for all operating states | A.11.2.2 Supporting utilities | CIS 1.1 | 💻 Asset Register |
Moderate Level (Pilot Light)
🎯 Business Impact: Standby systems, automated recovery, ~99% uptime
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 15% / OPEX 15%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan, 📝 Change Management
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automated recovery scripts | CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution | Recover.Improvements.RC.IM: Recovery planning and processes are improved | A.17.1.2 Implementing information security continuity | CIS 11.3, 11.5 | 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan |
| Standby systems | CP-6 Alternate Storage Site | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity to ensure availability is maintained | A.17.2.1 Availability of information processing facilities | CIS 11.4 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
| Limited redundancy | SC-6 Resource Availability | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity to ensure availability is maintained | A.11.2.3 Cabling security | CIS 12.2 | 🌐 Network Security Policy |
| Regular testing of failover processes | CP-4 Contingency Plan Testing | Recover.Testing.RC.TE: Recovery testing is performed | A.17.1.3 Verify, review and evaluate information security continuity | CIS 11.5 | 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan |
High Level (Warm Standby)
🎯 Business Impact: Partially active redundant systems, ~99.9% uptime
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 25% / OPEX 40%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan, 📊 Security Metrics
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partially active redundant systems | CP-7 Alternate Processing Site with CP-7(1) Separation from Primary Site | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity to ensure availability is maintained | A.17.2.1 Availability of information processing facilities | CIS 11.4 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
| Real-time data replication | CP-9(5) System Backup - Transfer to Alternate Storage Site | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-9: Backup solutions are protected | A.12.3.1 Information backup | CIS 11.3 | 💾 Backup Recovery Policy |
| Automated failover mechanisms | CP-10(4) System Recovery and Reconstitution - Restore Within Time Period | Recover.Recovery Planning.RC.RP: Recovery processes and procedures are executed to ensure restoration of systems or assets | A.17.1.2 Implementing information security continuity | CIS 11.5 | 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan |
| 24/7 monitoring | SI-4 System Monitoring | Detect.Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM: The information system is monitored to detect potential cybersecurity events | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2, 8.5 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
Very High Level (Multi-Site Active/Active)
🎯 Business Impact: Fully redundant multi-region deployment, ~99.99% uptime
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 60% / OPEX 70%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan, 📉 Risk Register
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fully redundant multi-region deployment | CP-7(3) Alternate Processing Site - Priority of Service | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-7: Development and testing environment(s) are separate from production | A.17.2.1 Availability of information processing facilities | CIS 11.4, 12.2 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
| Global load balancing | SC-5 Denial of Service Protection | Protect.Applications Security.PR.AP-9: System security services are protected from compromise or degradation | A.13.1.3 Segregation in networks | CIS 13.1, 13.3 | 🌐 Network Security Policy |
| Automatic failover with zero data loss | CP-10(2) System Recovery and Reconstitution - Transaction Recovery | Recover.Recovery Planning.RC.RP-4: Recovery capabilities meet Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) | A.17.1.2 Implementing information security continuity | CIS 11.3, 11.5 | 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan |
| Dedicated site reliability engineering | CP-2(2) Contingency Plan - Capacity Planning | Identify.Risk Management Strategy.ID.RM: Risk management processes are established, managed, and agreed to by stakeholders | A.5.8 Project management | CIS 1.1 | 📊 Risk Assessment Methodology |
| Regular cross-region testing | CP-4(2) Contingency Plan Testing - Alternate Processing Site | Recover.Testing.RC.TE-1: Recovery testing is performed periodically | A.17.1.3 Verify, review and evaluate information security continuity | CIS 11.5 | 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan |
2. ✅ Integrity Controls
📊 Control Mapping Overview
Integrity controls ensure data accuracy, completeness, and trustworthiness throughout its lifecycle, mapped to change management and data protection ISMS policies.
Basic Level (Manual Validation)
🎯 Business Impact: Manual data validation, minimal audit capabilities
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 5% / OPEX 10%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🏷️ Data Classification Policy, 📝 Change Management
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual data entry verification | SI-10 Information Input Validation (Basic) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Use integrity checking mechanisms to verify data integrity | A.14.2.5 Secure system engineering principles | CIS 16.10 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Basic access logs | AU-2 Audit Events (Basic) | Detect.Security Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM-7: Monitoring for unauthorized personnel, connections, devices, and software is performed | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2, 8.5 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| Simple backup strategies | CP-9 System Backup (Basic) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-9: Backup solutions are implemented | A.12.3.1 Information backup | CIS 11.1 | 💾 Backup Recovery Policy |
Moderate Level (Automated Validation)
🎯 Business Impact: Automated data validation, enhanced audit capabilities
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 20% / OPEX 20%
📋 ISMS Policies: 📝 Change Management, 🛠️ Secure Development Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automated data validation rules | SI-10(5) Information Input Validation - Restrict Inputs to Trusted Sources | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms verify software, firmware, and information integrity | A.14.2.8 System security testing | CIS 16.10 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Audit logging systems | AU-12 Audit Record Generation | Detect.Security Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM-1: The network is monitored to detect potential cybersecurity events | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2, 8.5 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| Error detection mechanisms | SI-11 Error Handling | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms verify software, firmware, and information integrity | A.14.2.6 Secure development environment | CIS 16.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Version control | CM-3 Configuration Change Control | Protect.Configuration Management.PR.CM-3: Configurations are managed | A.12.1.2 Change management | CIS 3.14 | 📝 Change Management |
High Level (Blockchain Validation)
🎯 Business Impact: Immutable data records, complete audit trail
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 35% / OPEX 50%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🔒 Cryptography Policy, 📝 Change Management
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distributed ledger solutions | SC-16 Transmission of Security and Privacy Attributes | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-8: Integrity checking mechanisms are used to verify data integrity | A.14.1.3 Protection of application services transactions | CIS 3.14 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Cryptographic verification | SC-13 Cryptographic Protection | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms verify software, firmware, and information integrity | A.10.1.1 Policy on the use of cryptographic controls | CIS 3.11 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Complete audit trails | AU-10 Non-repudiation | Detect.Security Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM-3: Personnel activity is monitored | A.12.4.4 Clock synchronization | CIS 8.2 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| Specialized blockchain engineers | AT-3 Role-based Training | Identify.Workforce Management.ID.WM-2: Personnel know their cyber roles and responsibilities | A.7.2.2 Information security awareness, education and training | CIS 14.1 | 🔐 Information Security Policy |
Very High Level (Smart Contracts)
🎯 Business Impact: Real-time validation, full audit traceability
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 60% / OPEX 70%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🔒 Cryptography Policy, 🛠️ Secure Development Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart contract execution | SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms verify software, firmware, and information integrity | A.14.1.3 Protection of application services transactions | CIS 16.4 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Automated governance rules | CM-3 Configuration Change Control | Protect.Configuration Management.PR.CM-1: Baseline configurations are established and maintained | A.8.1.1 Inventory of assets | CIS 1.1, 3.14 | 💻 Asset Register |
| Advanced cryptography | SC-12 Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-5: Protections against data leaks are implemented | A.10.1.2 Key management | CIS 3.11 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Real-time compliance verification | SI-7(7) Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity - Integration of Detection and Response | Detect.Detection Processes.DE.DP-4: Impact of detected events is determined | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2, 8.11 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| Regular code audits | SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation | Protect.Applications Security.PR.AP-8: Security reviews are conducted for acquired applications | A.14.2.8 System security testing | CIS 16.6 | 🔍 Vulnerability Management |
3. 🔐 Confidentiality Controls
📊 Control Mapping Overview
Confidentiality controls ensure information is accessible only to authorized users, mapped to access control and cryptography ISMS policies.
Basic Level (Public Data)
🎯 Business Impact: Minimal protection, suitable for public-facing data
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 5% / OPEX 5%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🏷️ Data Classification Policy, 🔐 Information Security Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic HTTPS | SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity (Basic) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-2: Data-in-transit is protected | A.13.2.1 Information transfer policies and procedures | CIS 3.10 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Simple authentication | IA-5 Authenticator Management (Basic) | Protect.Identity Management.PR.IM-1: Users, devices, and other assets are authenticated | A.8.2.1 Classification of information | CIS 5.2 | 🔑 Access Control Policy |
| Minimal access controls | AC-3 Access Enforcement (Basic) | Protect.Identity Management.PR.IM-2: User identities are proofed and bound to credentials and asserted in interactions | A.9.4.1 Information access restriction | CIS 6.1 | 🔑 Access Control Policy |
Moderate Level (Restricted Data)
🎯 Business Impact: Strong encryption, role-based access control
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 15% / OPEX 20%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🔒 Cryptography Policy, 🔑 Access Control Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong encryption at rest | SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-1: Data-at-rest is protected | A.10.1.1 Policy on the use of cryptographic controls | CIS 3.11 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Strong encryption in transit | SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-2: Data-in-transit is protected | A.13.2.3 Electronic messaging | CIS 3.10 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Role-based access control | AC-2 Account Management | Protect.Identity Management.PR.IM-4: Access permissions and authorizations are managed | A.9.2.2 User access provisioning | CIS 5.1, 6.1 | 🔑 Access Control Policy |
| Security monitoring | SI-4 System Monitoring | Detect.Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM: The information system and assets are monitored to identify cybersecurity events | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2, 8.5 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
High Level (Confidential Data)
🎯 Business Impact: Multi-factor authentication, advanced encryption, continuous monitoring
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 30% / OPEX 40%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🔑 Access Control Policy, 🔒 Cryptography Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-factor authentication | IA-2(1) Identification and Authentication - Multi-Factor Authentication | Protect.Identity Management.PR.IM-3: Multi-factor authentication is used | A.9.4.2 Secure log-on procedures | CIS 6.3, 6.5 | 🔑 Access Control Policy |
| Advanced encryption | SC-13 Cryptographic Protection | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-5: Protections against data leaks are implemented | A.10.1.2 Key management | CIS 3.11 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| SIEM solutions | SI-4(2) System Monitoring - Automated Tools and Mechanisms for Real-time Analysis | Detect.Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM-5: Unauthorized mobile code is detected | A.12.4.3 Administrator and operator logs | CIS 8.2, 8.11 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| DLP controls | SI-4(23) System Monitoring - Host-Based Devices | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-5: Protections against data leaks are implemented | A.8.2.3 Handling of assets | CIS 3.6 | 🏷️ Data Classification Policy |
| Privileged access management | AC-6 Least Privilege | Protect.Identity Management.PR.IM-4: Access permissions and authorizations are managed | A.9.2.3 Management of privileged access rights | CIS 5.4, 6.8 | 🔑 Access Control Policy |
Very High Level (Secret Data)
🎯 Business Impact: Quantum-resistant encryption, hardware security modules, advanced threat detection
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 50% / OPEX 60%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🔒 Cryptography Policy, 🌐 Network Security Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum-resistant algorithms | SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (Enhanced) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-5: Protections against data leaks are implemented | A.10.1.1 Policy on the use of cryptographic controls | CIS 3.11 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Hardware security modules | SC-12(3) Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management - Asymmetric Keys | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-1: Data-at-rest is protected | A.10.1.2 Key management | CIS 3.11 | 🔒 Cryptography Policy |
| Air-gapped systems | SC-7(5) Boundary Protection - Deny by Default / Allow by Exception | Protect.Applications Security.PR.AP-3: Data flow is managed | A.13.1.3 Segregation in networks | CIS 12.2, 13.1 | 🌐 Network Security Policy |
| Advanced threat detection | SI-4(25) System Monitoring - Optimize Network Traffic Analysis | Detect.Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM-1: The network is monitored to detect potential cybersecurity events | A.12.2.1 Controls against malware | CIS 10.1, 13.3 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| Physical security controls | PE-3 Physical Access Control | Protect.Physical Security.PR.PS: Physical devices and systems are managed | A.11.1.2 Physical entry controls | CIS 7.6 | 🔐 Information Security Policy |
| Secure facilities | PE-18 Location of System Components | Protect.Physical Security.PR.PS-4: Physical access is monitored and managed | A.11.1.3 Securing offices, rooms and facilities | CIS 7.7 | 🔐 Information Security Policy |
4. ♿ Accessibility Controls (New in v1.1.0)
📊 Control Mapping Overview
Accessibility controls ensure the application is usable by all users, including those using assistive technologies, mapped to WCAG 2.1 Level AA requirements and universal design principles.
🎯 Business Impact: Enhanced user experience for users with disabilities, legal compliance, expanded market reach
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 15% / OPEX 10%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🛠️ Secure Development Policy, 🔐 Information Security Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARIA labels and descriptions | No direct NIST 800-53 mapping (WCAG 2.1 / Section 508 accessibility requirement) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.8.11 Security of development and support processes | CIS 14.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Color contrast validation (WCAG 4.5:1) | No direct NIST 800-53 mapping (WCAG 2.1 / Section 508 accessibility requirement) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.8.11 Security of development and support | CIS 14.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Full keyboard navigation | No direct NIST 800-53 mapping (WCAG 2.1 / Section 508 accessibility requirement) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.8.11 Security of development and support | CIS 14.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Screen reader support (NVDA, VoiceOver) | No direct NIST 800-53 mapping (WCAG 2.1 / Section 508 accessibility requirement) | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.8.11 Security of development and support | CIS 14.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Accessible error messages | SI-11 Error Handling | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.14.2.6 Secure development environment | CIS 16.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Focus management and visible indicators | No direct NIST 800-53 mapping (WCAG 2.1 / Section 508 accessibility requirement) | Protect.Identity Management.PR.IM-4: Access permissions managed | A.9.2.2 User access provisioning | CIS 5.1 | 🔑 Access Control Policy |
📊 Evidence: ACCESSIBILITY_COMPLIANCE.md, ACCESSIBILITY_REPORT.md
🎯 Framework Compliance: WCAG 2.1 Level AA, Section 508, EN 301 549
5. ⚡ Performance Controls (New in v1.1.0)
📊 Control Mapping Overview
Performance controls ensure optimal application responsiveness and resource efficiency, mapped to capacity management and availability requirements.
🎯 Business Impact: Enhanced user experience, reduced bandwidth costs, improved SEO, better availability
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 10% / OPEX 5%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🛠️ Secure Development Policy, 🔄 Business Continuity Plan
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bundle size optimization (<500 KB) | SC-5 Denial of Service Protection | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity maintained | A.12.1.3 Capacity management | CIS 8.8 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
| Lazy loading for non-critical resources | SC-5 Denial of Service Protection | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity maintained | A.12.1.3 Capacity management | CIS 8.8 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
| Code splitting and caching strategy | SC-6 Resource Availability | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity maintained | A.12.1.3 Capacity management | CIS 12.2 | 🌐 Network Security Policy |
| Performance monitoring (Lighthouse) | SI-4 System Monitoring | Detect.Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM: Information system monitored | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2 | 📊 Security Metrics |
| Performance budget enforcement | CP-2 Contingency Plan | Identify.Business Environment.ID.BE-5: Resilience requirements established | A.17.2.1 Availability of information processing | CIS 11.4 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
| Core Web Vitals optimization (LCP, FID, CLS) | SC-5 Denial of Service Protection | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity maintained | A.12.1.3 Capacity management | CIS 8.8 | 🔄 Business Continuity Plan |
📊 Evidence: PERFORMANCE_COMPLIANCE.md, performance-testing.md, BUNDLE_ANALYSIS.md
🎯 Key Metrics: 207 KB total bundle (59% under budget), 9.63 KB initial load (92% under budget), <2s page load time
6. 🛡️ Error Handling & Resilience Controls (New in v1.1.0)
📊 Control Mapping Overview
Error handling controls ensure graceful degradation, prevent information disclosure, and maintain application stability during failures.
🎯 Business Impact: Improved security posture, better user experience, reduced information disclosure risk
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 10% / OPEX 10%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🛠️ Secure Development Policy, 🚨 Incident Response Plan
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| React Error Boundaries (11 widgets) | SI-11 Error Handling | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.14.2.6 Secure development environment | CIS 16.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Centralized error service | AU-3 Content of Audit Records | Detect.Security Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM-7: Monitoring performed | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| User-friendly error messages (no stack traces) | SI-11 Error Handling | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.14.2.6 Secure development environment | CIS 16.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Error context for debugging | AU-3 Content of Audit Records | Detect.Security Continuous Monitoring.DE.CM-7: Monitoring performed | A.12.4.1 Event logging | CIS 8.2 | 🚨 Incident Response Plan |
| Toast notifications for non-blocking errors | SI-11 Error Handling | Protect.Data Security.PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms | A.14.2.6 Secure development environment | CIS 16.6 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| Graceful degradation on failure | CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution | Recover.Recovery Planning.RC.RP: Recovery processes executed | A.17.1.2 Implementing information security continuity | CIS 11.5 | 🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan |
📊 Evidence: ERROR_HANDLING.md, WidgetErrorHandlingGuide.md
🛡️ Security Benefits: Prevents sensitive information disclosure, maintains application stability, enables security monitoring
7. 🎨 Design System & UI Consistency Controls (New in v1.1.0)
📊 Control Mapping Overview
Design system controls ensure visual consistency, maintainability, and security through standardized UI patterns and components.
🎯 Business Impact: Improved maintainability, reduced cognitive load, enhanced security through consistent patterns
💰 Investment Level: CAPEX 15% / OPEX 5%
📋 ISMS Policies: 🛠️ Secure Development Policy
| Technical Control | NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 | NIST CSF 2.0 | ISO 27001:2022 | CIS Controls v8.1 | ISMS Policy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centralized design tokens | CM-6 Configuration Settings | Protect.Configuration Management.PR.CM-1: Baseline configurations established | A.12.1.2 Change management | CIS 3.14 | 📝 Change Management |
| Consistent spacing (8px grid) | CM-6 Configuration Settings | Protect.Configuration Management.PR.CM-1: Baseline configurations established | A.12.1.2 Change management | CIS 3.14 | 📝 Change Management |
| Semantic color system | CM-6 Configuration Settings | Protect.Configuration Management.PR.CM-1: Baseline configurations established | A.12.1.2 Change management | CIS 3.14 | 📝 Change Management |
| Typography scale | CM-6 Configuration Settings | Protect.Configuration Management.PR.CM-1: Baseline configurations established | A.12.1.2 Change management | CIS 3.14 | 📝 Change Management |
| Reusable component library | SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools | Protect.Applications Security.PR.AP-8: Security reviews conducted | A.14.2.5 Secure system engineering principles | CIS 16.10 | 🛠️ Secure Development Policy |
| TailwindCSS configuration | CM-3 Configuration Change Control | Protect.Configuration Management.PR.CM-3: Configurations managed | A.12.1.2 Change management | CIS 3.14 | 📝 Change Management |
📊 Evidence: DESIGN_SYSTEM.md, DESIGN_SYSTEM_IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md
🎯 Benefits: Consistent UI patterns reduce user errors, standardized components reduce security vulnerabilities, maintainability improves patch application
🎯 Implementation Guidance
🔐 Security-First Approach
When implementing security controls at each level, align your approach with these principles from our ISMS framework:
-
🎯 Risk-Based Prioritization: Select controls based on specific risks identified through 📊 Risk Assessment Methodology and tracked in ⚠️ Risk Register
-
⚖️ Compliance Requirements: Align control implementation with applicable regulatory frameworks and ensure adherence via ✅ Compliance Checklist
-
💰 Resource Optimization: Balance security needs with available resources, leveraging cost-benefit analysis for investment decisions
-
🔄 Technical Debt Management: Consider how implementation affects future security upgrades and system evolution
-
🤝 Control Integration: Ensure controls work together cohesively through 📝 Change Management rather than as isolated measures
📋 ISMS Integration Benefits
This comprehensive control mapping provides several strategic advantages:
- 🔍 Traceability: Direct links from compliance framework controls to ISMS policies to implementation evidence
- 📊 Audit Readiness: Demonstrates systematic security management through documented control-to-policy relationships
- 🎯 Gap Analysis: Enables identification of control gaps across multiple frameworks simultaneously
- 💡 Best Practice Implementation: Shows how abstract compliance requirements translate to operational procedures
- 🤝 Stakeholder Confidence: Transparent documentation demonstrates cybersecurity consulting expertise
🏆 Business Value Creation
Security investments aligned with this mapping deliver measurable business value:
- 🛡️ Risk Reduction: Systematic control implementation reduces threat exposure and potential breach costs
- 🏆 Competitive Advantage: Security excellence through demonstrable control maturity
- 🤝 Customer Trust: Transparent security practices build confidence in service delivery
- 💰 Cost Efficiency: Integrated control framework reduces duplication and optimizes investments
- 🔄 Operational Excellence: Mature processes enable consistent, predictable security outcomes
- 💡 Innovation Enablement: Strong security foundation supports safe experimentation and growth
🔗 Related ISMS Documentation
This control mapping is part of Hack23 AB's comprehensive Information Security Management System. Related documents include:
📋 Core Governance
- 🔐 Information Security Policy - Overall security governance
- 🏷️ Classification Framework - Data classification methodology
- 🌐 ISMS Transparency Plan - Public disclosure strategy
🛡️ Security Operations
- 🚨 Incident Response Plan - Security event handling
- 🔍 Vulnerability Management - Security testing procedures
- 📊 Security Metrics - Performance measurement
📊 Risk & Compliance
- 📊 Risk Assessment Methodology - Risk evaluation framework
- ⚠️ Risk Register - Risk tracking and treatment
- ✅ Compliance Checklist - Regulatory requirement tracking
📚 Framework References
- NIST Special Publication 800-53 Rev. 5
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- CIS Controls v8.1
- NIST Special Publication 800-171 Rev. 2
- NIST Special Publication 800-82 Rev. 2
Document Control:
Approved by: Security Team
Distribution: Public
Classification:
Effective Date: 2025-01-10 (UTC)
Next Review: 2026-07-28
Framework Compliance: NIST 800-53 Rev. 5, NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001:2022, CIS Controls v8.1
ISMS Integration: Complete traceability to Hack23 AB ISMS
