CRA-ASSESSMENT.md

May 24, 2026 · View on GitHub

🛡️ Hack23 AB — CRA Conformity Assessment Process

Evidence-Driven Conformity Through Systematic Assessment
Demonstrating CRA Compliance Excellence for Cybersecurity Consulting

📋 Document Owner: CEO | 📄 Version: 1.3 | 📅 Last Updated: 2026-04-20 (UTC)
🔄 Review Cycle: Quarterly | ⏰ Next Review: 2026-07-20
🏷️ Classification: Public (Open Civic Transparency Platform)
📐 Process Reference: CRA Conformity Assessment Process | Open Source Policy

🎯 Purpose Statement

Hack23 AB's CRA conformity assessment process demonstrates how systematic regulatory compliance directly enables business growth rather than creating operational burden. Our comprehensive assessment framework serves as both operational tool and client demonstration of our cybersecurity consulting methodologies.

As a cybersecurity consulting company, our approach to CRA compliance becomes a showcase of professional implementation, demonstrating to potential clients how systematic regulatory adherence creates competitive advantages through robust security foundations while enabling EU market access.

Our commitment to transparency means our conformity assessment practices become a reference implementation, showing how comprehensive regulatory compliance enables business expansion while protecting organizational interests and maintaining stakeholder trust.

— James Pether Sörling, CEO/Founder

🔍 Purpose & Scope

This process provides a concise, repeatable CRA Conformity Assessment format (pre‑market & ongoing) for the three initial products (CIA, Black Trigram, CIA Compliance Manager). Aligns with CRA Annex I & V, Hack23 classification, secure development, and transparency policies.

Scope: All products within Asset Register requiring EU market placement.

📋 Quick Use Instructions

Copy this entire template into CRA-ASSESSMENT.md in your project root. Replace all {{PLACEHOLDERS}}, remove unused badge options, tick checkboxes, and commit with project changes when security posture materially changes.

Evidence Integration: All evidence (SBOM, provenance, test reports) stored in GitHub release artifacts and repository documentation. Assessment references current project state and links to immutable evidence.

CRA Regulation Alignment: This template supports CRA Annex V technical documentation requirements and Annex I essential requirements for cybersecurity through systematic self-assessment.

📚 Reference Implementations

The following Hack23 AB projects demonstrate completed CRA assessments using this template:

🚀 Project	📦 Product Type	🏷️ CRA Classification	📋 Assessment Status	🔗 Reference Link
🕵️ CIA (Citizen Intelligence Agency)	Political transparency platform	Standard (Non-commercial OSS)	✅ Complete	📄 CRA Assessment
⚫ Black Trigram	Korean martial atts game	Standard (Non-commercial OSS)	✅ Complete	📄 CRA Assessment
🛡️ CIA Compliance Manager	Compliance automation tool	Standard (Non-commercial OSS)	✅ Complete	📄 CRA Assessment

🎯 Implementation Examples

📝 Common Template Usage Patterns:

🔍 Classification: Each reference shows different market categories and CIA classification levels
🛡️ Security Controls: Demonstrates technical documentation across various product types
📊 Evidence Links: Examples of GitHub release attestations and ISMS policy integration
⚖️ Risk Assessment: Different risk profiles for transparency, security, and compliance tools

🔗 Evidence Repository Structure: All reference implementations follow the standardized evidence pattern:

📦 GitHub Releases: SBOM, SLSA attestations, and provenance documentation
🛡️ Security Policies: Direct links to ISMS framework policies and procedures
📊 Compliance Badges: OpenSSF Scorecard, CII Best Practices, and FOSSA license compliance
🚨 Vulnerability Disclosure: Standardized SECURITY.md and coordinated disclosure processes

💡 Usage Tips:

Start with Classification: Use reference implementations with similar CIA levels as templates
Evidence Alignment: Follow the GitHub attestations pattern from existing assessments
Risk Context: Adapt risk assessments based on similar product complexity
ISMS Integration: Reference implementations show policy linkage patterns for different product types

1️⃣ Project Identification

Supports CRA Annex V § 1 - Product Description Requirements

Field	Value
📦 Product	Citizen Intelligence Agency
🏷️ Version Tag	2025.1.2 (reflects current project state)
🔗 Repository	https://github.com/Hack23/cia
📧 Security Contact	security@hack23.org
🎯 Purpose (1–2 lines)	Independent, volunteer-driven OSINT platform monitoring Swedish political activity, providing comprehensive analysis of political activities, financial performance metrics, and transparency insights through data aggregation from authoritative government sources
🏪 Market

🏷️ Classification per ISMS Classification Framework:

Dimension	Level
🛡️ Confidentiality
✅ Integrity
⏱️ Availability
🕐 RTO
🔄 RPO

📋 Evidence Links:

🏗️ System Architecture: ARCHITECTURE.md - Complete C4 model architecture
🔐 Security Architecture: SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md - Comprehensive security implementation
🛡️ Future Security Vision: FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md - Advanced security roadmap
📊 Feature Overview: CIA Features - Live platform capabilities and screenshots
📚 Technical Documentation: Project Documentation - Complete API and component documentation
💰 Security Implementation: FinancialSecurityPlan.md - AWS security services and costs
🧠 System Overview: MINDMAP.md - Conceptual system relationships
📊 Data Architecture: DATA_MODEL.md - Data structures and relationships
🔄 Process Workflows: FLOWCHART.md - Data processing workflows
🎯 Strategic Analysis: SWOT.md - Strategic assessment

📊 Project Status & Quality Badges:

🔧 CI/CD & Automation Badges:

📋 Data Sources Evidence:

🏛️ Swedish Parliament: data.riksdagen.se - Parliamentary members, committees, documents
🗳️ Election Authority: val.se - Election data, parties, voting results
🌍 World Bank: data.worldbank.org - Global economic indicators
💹 Financial Authority: esv.se - Government finances and trends

2️⃣ CRA Scope & Classification

Supports CRA Article 6 - Scope and Article 7 - Product Classification Assessment

🏢 CRA Applicability (Select One):

🌐 Distribution Method (Select One):

📋 CRA Classification (Select One):

📝 CRA Scope Justification: The Citizen Intelligence Agency is a non-commercial open-source software project providing political transparency services through data aggregation and analysis of Swedish government sources. As a volunteer-driven initiative with community distribution via GitHub under Apache 2.0 license, it falls under non-commercial OSS with Standard CRA classification enabling self-assessment approach.

📋 Classification Evidence:

📜 Open Source License: Apache 2.0 License
🏛️ Classification Framework: ISMS Classification Policy
🤝 Community Model: Contributor Agreement
📊 Public Repository: GitHub Repository

🔍 Classification Impact:

Standard: Self-assessment approach (this document provides evidence)
Class I/II: Would require notified body assessment + additional documentation

3️⃣ Technical Documentation

Supports CRA Annex V § 2 - Technical Documentation Requirements

🏗️ CRA Technical Area	📝 Implementation Summary	📋 Evidence Location
🎨 Product Architecture (Annex V § 2.1)	Complete C4 model architecture with container, component, and dynamic diagrams showing multi-layered Spring-based design	ARCHITECTURE.md + SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md + System Mindmap + Future Architecture
📦 SBOM & Components (Annex I § 1.1)	Automated SBOM generation via Maven with comprehensive dependency scanning and SLSA Level 3 attestations	GitHub Attestations + Latest Release SBOM + Package Dependencies
🔐 Cybersecurity Controls (Annex I § 1.2)	Spring Security 5.8.16 framework with MFA via Google Authenticator (implemented, optional enrollment), Drools 10.1.0 brute-force attack detection, Passay 2.0.0 password validation, role-based access control (ANONYMOUS/USER/ADMIN), comprehensive Javers 7.11.0 auditing, AWS security services integration	Security Architecture + Future Security Architecture + Access Control Policy + Cryptography Policy
🛡️ Supply Chain Security (Annex I § 1.3)	SLSA Level 3 attestations, Dependabot automation, signed releases, OpenSSF Scorecard monitoring, CII Best Practices compliance	GitHub Attestations + Dependabot Config + WORKFLOWS.md + OpenSSF Scorecard + CII Best Practices
🔄 Update Mechanism (Annex I § 1.4)	Automated CI/CD pipeline with comprehensive security scanning (CodeQL, dependency review), version management, signed releases via GitHub Actions	CI/CD Workflows + Release Workflow + Future Workflows + Change Management
📊 Security Monitoring (Annex I § 1.5)	Comprehensive logging via Javers auditing, ApplicationSession/ActionEvent tracking, AWS security services (GuardDuty, Security Hub, Config, Inspector), CloudWatch integration	Security Architecture + AWS Security Services + Incident Response Plan
🏷️ Data Protection (Annex I § 2.1)	Data classification system, GDPR compliance, encryption at rest/transit via AWS KMS, minimal personal data collection, PostgreSQL SSL configuration	Data Classification Policy + Entity Documentation + Data Model + Future Data Model
📚 User Guidance (Annex I § 2.2)	Comprehensive security configuration documentation including PostgreSQL 18 SSL setup, deployment guides, architecture documentation	README.md + PostgreSQL Security Configuration + Security Architecture Guide + CloudFormation Template
🔍 Vulnerability Disclosure (Annex I § 2.3)	Public vulnerability disclosure policy with GitHub Security Advisories, coordinated disclosure process, 48h acknowledgment timeline	SECURITY.md + Security Advisories + Vulnerability Management

📋 Comprehensive ISMS Integration:

🏗️ Architecture & Design: Complete Architecture + Security Architecture + Future Vision + Future Security
📊 Asset Management: Asset Register + Component Documentation + API Documentation
🔒 Security Controls: Information Security Policy + Network Security Policy
🔧 Development Process: Secure Development Policy + CI/CD Evidence + Future Workflows

4️⃣ Risk Assessment

Supports CRA Annex V § 3 - Risk Assessment Documentation

Reference: 📊 Risk Assessment Methodology and ⚠️ Risk Register

🚨 CRA Risk Category	🎯 Asset	📊 Likelihood	💥 Impact (C/I/A)	🛡️ CRA Control Implementation	⚖️ Residual	📋 Evidence
Supply Chain Attack (Art. 11)	Build pipeline & dependencies	M	H/H/M	SBOM + SLSA Level 3 provenance + Dependabot automation + OpenSSF Scorecard monitoring + CII Best Practices	L	GitHub Attestations + WORKFLOWS.md + Scorecard Results
Unauthorized Access (Art. 11)	Political data & user accounts	M	H/H/H	Spring Security 5.8.16 + Google Authenticator MFA (implemented, optional enrollment) + Drools 10.1.0 BruteForceAttack detection + Passay 2.0.0 password policy + login blocking thresholds + role-based access (ANONYMOUS/USER/ADMIN) + ApplicationSession tracking	L	Security Architecture + Authentication Implementation
Data Breach (Art. 11)	Swedish political intelligence data	L	H/H/H	PostgreSQL 18 SSL + pgaudit + pgcrypto + AWS KMS encryption + WAF + VPC segmentation + minimal personal data collection + Javers 7.11.0 auditing + Bouncy Castle 1.84	L	AWS Security Config + Data Protection
Component Vulnerability (Art. 11)	Java 26 dependencies & runtime (source level 21)	M	M/H/M	CodeQL scanning + Dependabot updates + dependency review workflow + SonarCloud analysis + Amazon Inspector + OWASP Dependency-Check + zero critical CVEs in 5+ years	L	Security Scans + Dependabot + Quality Gate
Service Disruption (Art. 11)	Public transparency platform	M	L/M/H	AWS multi-AZ architecture + ALB + CloudWatch monitoring + auto-scaling + AWS Resilience Hub assessment	M	Infrastructure Architecture + AWS Resilience

⚖️ CRA Risk Statement: LOW - Comprehensive security controls and evidence-based monitoring support CRA essential cybersecurity requirements evaluation
✅ Risk Acceptance: James Sörling, CEO Hack23 AB - December 2024

📋 Risk Management Framework Evidence:

📊 Methodology: Risk Assessment Framework
⚠️ Risk Tracking: Active Risk Register
🔄 Business Continuity: Continuity Planning + Platform BCP + Multi-AZ Evidence
🆘 Disaster Recovery: Recovery Procedures + Platform BCP + AWS Implementation
📈 Risk Monitoring: Security Metrics + Dashboard Evidence

5️⃣ Essential Cybersecurity Requirements

Supports CRA Annex I - Essential Requirements Self-Assessment

📋 CRA Annex I Requirement	✅ Status	📋 Implementation Evidence
🛡️ § 1.1 - Secure by Design	[x]	Defense-in-depth Architecture + AWS WAF Configuration + VPC Segmentation + Spring Security 5.8.16 framework with method-level @Secured annotations + Drools 10.1.0 risk rules
🔒 § 1.2 - Secure by Default	[x]	Hardened PostgreSQL 18 SSL Setup + SSL Configuration + Secure Defaults Documentation
🏷️ § 2.1 - Personal Data Protection	[x]	GDPR Compliance Policy + Minimal Data Collection + Entity Model Documentation
🔍 § 2.2 - Vulnerability Disclosure	[x]	Security Policy + Security Advisories + Vulnerability Management Process + 48h acknowledgment commitment
📦 § 2.3 - Software Bill of Materials	[x]	Automated SBOM Generation + SPDX Format Attestations + Release Evidence
🔐 § 2.4 - Secure Updates	[x]	SLSA Level 3 Attestations + Signed Releases + Secure CI/CD Pipeline
📊 § 2.5 - Security Monitoring	[x]	Javers Auditing System + ApplicationSession/ActionEvent Tracking + AWS Security Services
📚 § 2.6 - Security Documentation	[x]	PostgreSQL Security Guide + Complete Architecture Documentation + Security Implementation Guide

🎯 CRA Self-Assessment Status: EVIDENCE_DOCUMENTED

🔍 Security Implementation Evidence:

🔐 Authentication: MFA Implementation (Optional Enrollment) + Drools 10.1.0 BruteForce Detection + Login Blocking + Spring Security 5.8.16 Integration + Passay 2.0.0 Password Policy
🛡️ Authorization: Role-Based Access (ANONYMOUS/USER/ADMIN) + Method Security (@Secured annotations) + IAM Integration
📊 Monitoring: Security Events + CloudWatch Integration + GuardDuty Implementation
🔒 Encryption: KMS Implementation (Envelope Encryption / At-Rest Encryption) + TLS Configuration + PostgreSQL 18 SSL + pgcrypto + Bouncy Castle 1.84

🔍 Standard Security Reporting Process: Each project includes standardized security reporting via SECURITY.md following coordinated vulnerability disclosure:

📧 Private Reporting: GitHub Security Advisories for confidential disclosure
⏱️ Response Timeline: 48h acknowledgment, 7d validation, 30d resolution per SECURITY.md
🏆 Recognition Program: Public acknowledgment with option for anonymity
🔄 Continuous Support: Latest version maintained with security updates
📋 Vulnerability Scope: Authentication bypass, injection attacks, remote code execution, data exposure

ISMS Integration: All vulnerability reports processed through ⚠️ Vulnerability Management procedures

6️⃣ Conformity Assessment Evidence

Supports CRA Article 19 - Conformity Assessment Documentation

📊 Quality & Security Automation Status:

Reference: 🛠️ Secure Development Policy

🧪 Control	🎯 Requirement	✅ Implementation	📋 Evidence
🧪 Unit Testing	≥80% line coverage, ≥70% branch	✅ Implemented	SonarCloud Coverage + Maven Surefire Reports + Test Foundation
🌐 E2E Testing	Critical user journeys validated	✅ Implemented	Test Framework Documentation + Selenium WebDriver implementation + Test Results
🔍 SAST Scanning	Zero critical/high vulnerabilities	✅ Implemented	CodeQL Analysis + SonarCloud Security + Security Rating Badge
📦 SCA Scanning	Zero critical unresolved dependencies	✅ Implemented	Dependabot Alerts + Dependency Review Workflow + FOSSA Analysis
🔒 Secret Scanning	Zero exposed secrets/credentials	✅ Implemented	GitHub Secret Scanning + Push protection enabled + Security Tab
🕷️ DAST Scanning	Zero exploitable high+ findings	✅ Implemented
📦 SBOM Generation	SPDX + CycloneDX per release	✅ Implemented	GitHub Attestations + Release SBOM Evidence + Package Dependencies
🛡️ Provenance	SLSA Level 3 attestation	✅ Implemented	GitHub Attestations + SLSA Badge + Sigstore signing
📊 Quality Gates	SonarCloud quality gate passing	✅ Implemented	SonarCloud Quality Gate + Quality Badge

🎖️ Security & Compliance Badges:

🔍 Supply Chain Security:

🏆 Best Practices & Quality:

⚖️ License & Compliance:

🛡️ Security Scanning:

📊 Project Health:

🔗 Release Evidence: GitHub Attestations: https://github.com/Hack23/cia/attestations

📦 CIA Release Evidence Pattern:

🎯 Release Assets Structure: Evidence available at: Latest Release

cia-dist-deb-2025.1.2.all.deb               # Debian package
cia-dist-deb-2025.1.2.all.deb.intoto.jsonl  # SLSA provenance
cia-dist-war-2025.1.2.war                   # WAR deployment  
cia-2025.1.2.spdx.json                      # SPDX SBOM
cia-2025.1.2.spdx.json.intoto.jsonl         # SBOM attestation

🔍 Evidence Validation Commands:

# Verify SBOM in GitHub release
gh release view --repo Hack23/cia --json assets

# Check SLSA attestations
gh attestation list --repo Hack23/cia

# Validate security scorecard
curl -s https://api.securityscorecards.dev/projects/github.com/Hack23/cia | jq '.score'

# Verify FOSSA compliance
curl -s https://app.fossa.io/api/projects/git%2Bgithub.com%2FHack23%2Fcia/issues | jq '.issues | length'

# Check SonarCloud quality metrics
curl -s https://sonarcloud.io/api/measures/component?component=Hack23_cia&metricKeys=alert_status,security_rating,reliability_rating,sqale_rating

7️⃣ Post-Market Surveillance

Supports CRA Article 23 - Obligations of Economic Operators

Reference: 🌐 ISMS Transparency Plan and 📊 Security Metrics

📡 CRA Monitoring Obligation	🔧 Implementation	⏱️ Frequency	🎯 Action Trigger	📋 Evidence
🔍 Vulnerability Monitoring (Art. 23.1)	Dependabot + GitHub advisories + CodeQL scanning + SonarCloud analysis + Amazon Inspector	Continuous	Auto-create security issues and PRs	Dependabot Alerts + Security Advisories
🚨 Incident Reporting (Art. 23.2)	ApplicationActionEvent tracking + Javers auditing + AWS CloudWatch/GuardDuty/Security Hub	Real-time	ENISA 24h notification prep via comprehensive logging	Security Monitoring + AWS Security Services
📊 Security Posture Tracking (Art. 23.3)	OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2/10 + SonarCloud + FOSSA + CII Best Practices (project 770) + SLSA Level 3 + zero critical CVEs in 5+ years + AWS Config	Weekly/Daily	Score decline investigation via automated alerts	OpenSSF Scorecard + SonarCloud Dashboard
🔄 Update Distribution (Art. 23.4)	Automated GitHub releases + Debian package distribution + SLSA attestations + AWS Systems Manager patching	As needed	Critical vulnerability patches via secure CI/CD pipeline	Release Management + CI/CD Workflows

📋 CRA Reporting Readiness: Documentation and procedures prepared for ENISA incident reporting per 🚨 Incident Response Plan

🔗 ISMS Monitoring Integration:

📊 Continuous Monitoring: Security Metrics Framework
🌐 Transparency Strategy: ISMS Transparency Plan
🤝 Third-Party Management: Supplier Monitoring
✅ Compliance Tracking: Regulatory Adherence
💾 Data Protection: Backup and Recovery

🤖 AI Agent-Driven CRA Compliance

Supports CRA Article 16 - Quality Management System through Automated Evidence Generation

📋 Automated Compliance Workflow

Hack23 AB's curated agent ecosystem (per 🔐 Information Security Strategy) monitors and validates CRA evidence generated by automated workflows:

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#1565C0", "primaryTextColor": "#fff", "lineColor": "#1565C0", "secondaryColor": "#4CAF50", "tertiaryColor": "#FF9800"}}}%%
flowchart TD
    BUILD["🔨 Build Process<br/>GitHub Actions Workflow"] --> SBOM_GEN["📦 SBOM Generation<br/>FOSSA + Dependency Graph"]
    SBOM_GEN --> AGENT_REVIEW["🤖 Task Agent<br/>SBOM Validation & Gap Detection"]
    
    AGENT_REVIEW --> VULN_SCAN["🔍 Vulnerability Scanning<br/>Dependabot + GitHub Security"]
    VULN_SCAN --> AGENT_TRIAGE["🤖 Agent Triage<br/>CRA Disclosure Requirements"]
    
    AGENT_TRIAGE --> SLSA["🎖️ SLSA Attestation<br/>Automated Level 3"]
    SLSA --> EVIDENCE["📊 GitHub Actions<br/>Evidence Package Consolidation"]
    
    EVIDENCE --> CE{"✅ CE Marking<br/>Ready?"}
    CE -->|Yes| APPROVAL["👨‍💼 CEO Final Approval"]
    CE -->|No| GAP["📋 Compliance Gap<br/>Agent Issue Creation"]
    
    GAP --> REMEDIATE["👷 Specialist Agent<br/>Gap Remediation"]
    REMEDIATE --> SBOM_GEN
    APPROVAL --> PUBLISH["🌐 CE Marking Published"]
    
    style BUILD fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
    style SBOM_GEN fill:#4CAF50,color:#fff
    style AGENT_REVIEW fill:#FF9800,color:#fff
    style VULN_SCAN fill:#4CAF50,color:#fff
    style AGENT_TRIAGE fill:#FF9800,color:#fff
    style SLSA fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
    style EVIDENCE fill:#4CAF50,color:#fff
    style CE fill:#FFC107,color:#000
    style APPROVAL fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff
    style GAP fill:#D32F2F,color:#fff
    style REMEDIATE fill:#FF9800,color:#fff
    style PUBLISH fill:#1565C0,color:#fff

🎯 Agent Responsibilities Matrix

Agent Type	CRA Compliance Responsibilities	Escalation Criteria	Evidence Generation
🔧 Curator-Agent	CRA tool configuration (FOSSA, SLSA), MCP server management	Tool configuration changes require CEO approval	Agent configuration documentation
📋 Task Agents	Compliance gap identification, SBOM validation, evidence collection, issue creation with ISMS mapping	Critical: Missing SBOM, undisclosed vulnerabilities, essential requirements gaps	Automated compliance issues, gap analysis reports
👷 Security Specialist	Vulnerability remediation, security attestation generation, SLSA provenance validation	Breaking changes, architectural modifications, security control failures	Security scan reports, remediation tracking
📝 Documentation Specialist	CE marking documentation, CRA disclosure updates, technical file maintenance	Policy conflicts, regulatory interpretation needs	Technical documentation, compliance evidence packages
👨‍💼 CEO (Human)	Final CE marking approval, regulatory sign-off, legal decisions	All CE marking publications, regulatory submissions	Formal approvals, regulatory submissions

📊 Automated Compliance Evidence Generation

Evidence Type	Automation Level	Generation Method	Agent Role
📦 SBOM Generation	100% Automated	FOSSA + GitHub Dependency Graph	Task agent validation & gap detection
🔍 Vulnerability Status	100% Automated	Dependabot + GitHub Security	Automated triage + specialist remediation
🎖️ Security Attestations	100% Automated	SLSA Level 3 build provenance	Automated signature verification
📋 CE Marking Documentation	80% Automated	Compliance checklist with automated evidence links	Human review + CEO approval
🌐 Public Disclosure	90% Automated	GitHub Security advisory generation	Coordinated disclosure review

🇪🇺 EU AI Act Integration

Supports EU AI Act (2024/1689) Transparency and Human Oversight Requirements

📋 AI System Transparency Requirements

Hack23 AB's AI agent ecosystem complies with EU AI Act transparency obligations (per 🤖 AI Policy):

AI System	Risk Classification	Transparency Obligations	Human Oversight
🤖 GitHub Copilot	Minimal Risk	AI-generated code attributed via `Co-authored-by` trailers in PR descriptions where applicable	All code reviewed by CEO before merge
💬 OpenAI GPT	Minimal Risk	AI-generated content documented in issues where applicable	Human validation of all outputs

🔐 Transparency Implementation:

Clear Attribution: AI-generated content attributed via Co-authored-by trailers and PR descriptions where applicable
Audit Trail: Complete provenance chain for all agent actions via GitHub
Documentation: AI usage documented in agent profiles (.github/agents/*.md)
Version Control: All AI-generated changes subject to Git history and review

🤖 Agent-Assisted CRA Compliance Framework

%%{init: {"theme": "base", "themeVariables": {"primaryColor": "#1565C0", "primaryTextColor": "#fff", "lineColor": "#1565C0", "secondaryColor": "#4CAF50", "tertiaryColor": "#FF9800"}}}%%
flowchart TD
    AGENT["🤖 AI Agent<br/>Compliance Analysis"] --> GENERATE["📋 Evidence Generation<br/>Automated Collection"]
    GENERATE --> REVIEW["👨‍💼 CEO Review<br/>Human Validation"]
    
    REVIEW --> APPROVE{"✅ Approve<br/>Evidence?"}
    APPROVE -->|Yes| SIGN["✍️ CEO Sign-off<br/>Compliance Attestation"]
    APPROVE -->|No| CORRECT["🔧 Correction<br/>Manual Adjustment"]
    
    CORRECT --> GENERATE
    SIGN --> PUBLISH["🌐 CE Marking<br/>Public Declaration"]
    
    style AGENT fill:#FF9800,color:#fff
    style GENERATE fill:#1565C0,color:#fff
    style REVIEW fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff
    style APPROVE fill:#FFC107,color:#000
    style SIGN fill:#2E7D32,color:#fff
    style CORRECT fill:#D32F2F,color:#fff
    style PUBLISH fill:#1565C0,color:#fff

🎯 Key Principles:

🤖 Agents Assist: AI generates evidence and identifies gaps, but does NOT make compliance decisions
👨‍💼 Human Decides: CEO maintains final authority for all CE marking and regulatory decisions
✅ Validation Required: All agent recommendations subject to human validation before action
📋 Explicit Approval: Compliance sign-off requires explicit CEO approval signature

📊 EU AI Act Compliance Evidence

Requirement	Implementation	Evidence Location
AI System Documentation	Agent profiles and MCP configurations	`.github/agents/*.md`, `.github/copilot-mcp-config.json`
Human Oversight Procedures	CEO approval workflow for all PRs	GitHub PR review history
Risk Assessment	AI risk classification per AI Policy	🤖 AI Policy
Transparency Obligations	Clear AI attribution in all outputs	Git commit messages, issue descriptions
Accountability Framework	CEO ultimate responsibility documented	This document + 🔐 Information Security Strategy

8️⃣ EU Declaration of Conformity

Supports CRA Article 28 - EU Declaration of Conformity

📝 Complete when placing product on EU market

🏢 Manufacturer: Hack23 AB, Gothenburg, Sweden
📦 Product: Citizen Intelligence Agency
📋 CRA Compliance: Self-assessment documentation supporting CRA essential cybersecurity requirements evaluation
🔍 Assessment: Self-assessment documentation per Article 24 (non-commercial OSS with standard classification)
📊 Standards: ISO/IEC 27001 security framework + OWASP ASVS application security + NIST SSDF secure development + AWS Well-Architected Framework

📅 Date & Signature: 2026-03-19 - James Sörling, CEO Hack23 AB

📂 Technical Documentation: This assessment + evidence bundle supports CRA Annex V technical documentation requirements

9️⃣ Assessment Completion & Approval

Supports CRA Article 16 - Quality Management System Documentation

📊 CRA Self-Assessment Summary

Overall CRA Documentation Status: EVIDENCE_DOCUMENTED

Key CRA Documentation Areas:

✅ Annex I essential requirements documented with comprehensive evidence links
✅ Annex V technical documentation comprehensively structured
✅ Article 11 security measures implemented and documented
✅ Article 23 post-market surveillance procedures operational

Outstanding Documentation:

CIA-DAST-001: Implement dynamic application security testing → Target: Q1 2025 (Owner: Security Team)
CIA-MOBILE-001: Enhance mobile responsive design security → Target: Q2 2025 (Owner: Development Team)

✅ Formal Approval

👤 Role	📝 Name	📅 Date	✍️ Assessment Attestation
🔒 CRA Security Assessment	James Sörling	2026-03-19	Essential requirements documented with comprehensive evidence
🎯 Product Responsibility	James Sörling	2026-03-19	Technical documentation complete and publicly accessible
⚖️ Legal Compliance Review	James Sörling	2026-03-19	EU regulatory documentation requirements satisfied

📊 CRA Assessment Status: SELF_ASSESSMENT_DOCUMENTED

🎨 CRA Assessment Maintenance

📋 Update Triggers

Per CRA Article 15 - Substantial Modification

CRA assessment updated only when changes constitute "substantial modification" under CRA:

🏗️ Security Architecture Changes: New authentication methods, trust boundaries, or encryption
🛡️ Essential Requirement Impact: Changes affecting Annex I compliance
📦 Critical Dependencies: New supply chain components with security implications
🔍 Risk Profile Changes: New threats or vulnerability classes affecting political data
⚖️ Regulatory Updates: CRA implementing acts or guidance changes

🎯 Maintenance Principle: Assessment stability preferred - avoid routine updates that don't impact CRA compliance

🔗 CRA Evidence Integration

## Current CRA Self-Assessment Evidence

**🏷️ Product Version:** {{CURRENT_VERSION}}
**📦 CRA Technical Documentation:** This assessment + [Latest Release](https://github.com/Hack23/cia/releases/latest)
**🛡️ Security Attestations:** [GitHub Attestations](https://github.com/Hack23/cia/attestations)
**📊 Assessment Status:** ![CRA Status](https://img.shields.io/badge/CRA_Self_Assessment-EVIDENCE_DOCUMENTED-blue)

📚 CRA Regulatory Alignment

🔐 CRA Article Cross-References

Article 6: Scope determination → Section 2 (CRA Classification)
Article 11: Essential cybersecurity requirements → Section 5 (Requirements Assessment)
Article 19: Conformity assessment → Section 6 (Evidence Documentation)
Article 23: Post-market obligations → Section 7 (Surveillance Documentation)
Article 28: Declaration of conformity → Section 8 (DoC Template)
Annex I: Technical requirements → Section 5 (Requirements self-assessment mapping)
Annex V: Technical documentation → Complete template structure

🌐 ISMS Integration Benefits

🔄 Operational Continuity: CRA self-assessment integrated with existing security operations
📊 Evidence Reuse: Security metrics and monitoring serve dual ISMS/CRA documentation purposes
🎯 Business Value: CRA readiness demonstrates cybersecurity consulting expertise through systematic documentation
🤝 Client Confidence: Transparent self-assessment approach showcases professional implementation methodology

📋 Complete ISMS Policy Framework

🔐 Core Security Governance

🔐 Information Security Policy — Overall security governance and business value framework
🏷️ Classification Framework — Data and asset classification methodology with business impact analysis
🌐 ISMS Transparency Plan — Public disclosure strategy and stakeholder communication

🛡️ Security Control Implementation

🔒 Cryptography Policy — Encryption standards, key management, and post-quantum readiness
🔑 Access Control Policy — Identity management, MFA requirements, and privilege management
🌐 Network Security Policy — Network segmentation, firewall rules, and perimeter security
🏷️ Data Classification Policy — Information handling, protection levels, and retention requirements

⚙️ Operational Excellence Framework

🛠️ Secure Development Policy — SDLC security, testing requirements, and automation gates
📝 Change Management — Controlled modification procedures and release management
🔍 Vulnerability Management — Security testing, coordinated disclosure, and remediation
🤝 Third Party Management — Supplier risk assessment and ongoing monitoring
🔓 Open Source Policy — OSS governance, license compliance, and contribution management

🚨 Incident Response & Recovery

🚨 Incident Response Plan — Security event handling, communication, and forensics
🔄 Business Continuity Plan — Business resilience, recovery objectives, and continuity strategies
🆘 Disaster Recovery Plan — Technical recovery procedures and system restoration
💾 Backup Recovery Policy — Data protection, backup validation, and restore procedures

📊 Performance Management & Compliance

📊 Security Metrics — KPI tracking, performance measurement, and continuous improvement
💻 Asset Register — Comprehensive asset inventory with risk classifications
📉 Risk Register — Risk identification, assessment, treatment, and monitoring
📊 Risk Assessment Methodology — Systematic risk evaluation framework
✅ Compliance Checklist — Regulatory requirement tracking and attestation

🎯 Framework Benefits for CRA Compliance:

🔄 Process Maturity: Established ISMS demonstrates systematic security management capabilities
📋 Evidence Repository: Comprehensive documentation supports CRA technical file requirements
🛡️ Control Effectiveness: Implemented security measures provide concrete evidence of essential requirements
📊 Continuous Improvement: Metrics and review cycles demonstrate ongoing security posture management
🤝 Stakeholder Confidence: Transparent practices showcase professional cybersecurity consulting expertise

📋 Document Control:
✅ Approved by: James Pether Sörling, CEO - Hack23 AB
📤 Distribution: Public
🏷️ Classification:
📅 Effective Date: 2026-03-19
⏰ Next Review: 2026-06-19
🎯 Framework Compliance:
🇪🇺 CRA Alignment: Follows CRA Conformity Assessment Process template — supports CRA Annex V technical documentation and self-assessment requirements
🔓 Open Source Policy: Compliant with Hack23 Open Source Policy
🔐 ISMS Integration: Comprehensive alignment with public ISMS framework for operational excellence