UnitTestPlan.md
May 5, 2026 Β· View on GitHub
π§ͺ EU Parliament Monitor β Unit Test Plan
Comprehensive Unit Testing Strategy for European Parliament Intelligence
π¬ Vitest Framework β’ π Coverage Tracking β’ π Security Validation
π Document Owner: CEO | π Version: 1.0 | π
Last Updated:
2026-02-20 (UTC)
π Review Cycle: Quarterly | β° Next Review: 2026-05-20
π Architecture Documentation Map
| Document | Focus | Description | Documentation Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ποΈ Architecture | C4 model showing current system structure | View Source |
| Future Architecture | ποΈ Architecture | C4 model showing future system structure | View Source |
| Mindmaps | π§ Concept | Current system component relationships | View Source |
| Future Mindmaps | π§ Concept | Future capability evolution | View Source |
| SWOT Analysis | πΌ Business | Current strategic assessment | View Source |
| Future SWOT Analysis | πΌ Business | Future strategic opportunities | View Source |
| Data Model | π Data | Current data structures and relationships | View Source |
| Future Data Model | π Data | Enhanced European Parliament data architecture | View Source |
| Flowcharts | π Process | Current data processing workflows | View Source |
| Future Flowcharts | π Process | Enhanced AI-driven workflows | View Source |
| State Diagrams | π Behavior | Current system state transitions | View Source |
| Future State Diagrams | π Behavior | Enhanced adaptive state transitions | View Source |
| Security Architecture | π‘οΈ Security | Current security implementation | View Source |
| Future Security Architecture | π‘οΈ Security | Security enhancement roadmap | View Source |
| Threat Model | π― Security | STRIDE threat analysis | View Source |
| Classification | π·οΈ Governance | CIA classification & BCP | View Source |
| CRA Assessment | π‘οΈ Compliance | Cyber Resilience Act | View Source |
| Workflows | βοΈ DevOps | CI/CD documentation | View Source |
| Future Workflows | π DevOps | Planned CI/CD enhancements | View Source |
| Business Continuity Plan | π Resilience | Recovery planning | View Source |
| Financial Security Plan | π° Financial | Cost & security analysis | View Source |
| End-of-Life Strategy | π¦ Lifecycle | Technology EOL planning | View Source |
| Unit Test Plan | π§ͺ Testing | Unit testing strategy | View Source |
| E2E Test Plan | π Testing | End-to-end testing | View Source |
| Performance Testing | β‘ Performance | Performance benchmarks | View Source |
| Security Policy | π Security | Vulnerability reporting & security policy | View Source |
π Executive Summary
This Unit Test Plan provides the comprehensive unit testing strategy for the EU Parliament Monitor platform, ensuring all critical components β news generation, multi-language support, and content validation β function correctly and maintain quality standards.
π ISMS Alignment: This unit test plan implements Hack23 Secure Development Policy Section 4.3.1 β Unit Testing Requirements.
ISMS Compliance Requirements
| π― Requirement | π Target | β Status | π ISMS Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Line Coverage | β₯80% | β Tracked | Section 4.3.1.1 |
| Branch Coverage | β₯70% | β Tracked | Section 4.3.1.2 |
| Test Execution | Every commit | β Automated | Section 4.3.1.3 |
| Public Reporting | Required | β Published | Section 4.3.1.4 |
Evidence Links:
See Also:
π§ Testing Framework
Core Testing Stack
| Component | Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Testing | Vitest | Modern, fast unit test runner |
| Coverage Tool | @vitest/coverage-v8 | V8-based code coverage |
| Assertions | Vitest built-in | expect() API |
| Mocking | Vitest vi.mock | Module and function mocking |
| Environment | Node.js 26 | Runtime environment |
Configuration
Coverage thresholds and reporting configured in vitest.config.js:
export default defineConfig({
test: {
coverage: {
provider: 'v8',
reporter: ['text', 'html', 'lcov', 'json-summary'],
},
},
});
π§© Test Organization
File Structure
test/
βββ unit/
β βββ news-generator.test.js # News generation logic
β βββ template-engine.test.js # HTML template processing
β βββ language-utils.test.js # Multi-language utilities
βββ integration/
β βββ multi-language.test.js # Multi-language integration
β βββ news-generation.test.js # Full news pipeline
βββ fixtures/
β βββ sample-news.json # Test news data
β βββ test-template.html # Test HTML template
βββ README.md
Test Categories
| Category | Purpose | Coverage Target |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Tests | Individual function validation | β₯80% line coverage |
| Integration Tests | Multi-component workflows | Key pipeline paths |
| Fixture Tests | Template and data validation | All templates |
π§ͺ Test Execution
Development Commands
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
npm run test | Run all tests once |
npm run test:coverage | Run tests with coverage report |
npm run test -- --watch | Watch mode for development |
CI/CD Integration
Tests run automatically on every push and pull request via GitHub Actions:
- name: Run tests
run: npm run test
- name: Run tests with coverage
run: npm run test:coverage
π Coverage Requirements
Overall Targets
Per ISMS Secure Development Policy:
| Metric | Policy Minimum | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Line Coverage | 80% | β Tracked |
| Branch Coverage | 70% | β Tracked |
| Function Coverage | 75% | β Tracked |
| Statement Coverage | 80% | β Tracked |
Component Coverage
| Component | Target | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| News Generation Scripts | 80%+ | β High |
| Template Engine | 80%+ | β High |
| Language Utilities | 90%+ | β High |
| Content Validation | 80%+ | β οΈ Medium |
| HTML Generation | 70%+ | β οΈ Medium |
π Testing Standards
Test Structure β AAA Pattern
All tests follow the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern:
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
describe('NewsGenerator', () => {
it('should generate articles in all supported languages', () => {
// Arrange
const languages = [
'en',
'de',
'fr',
'es',
'it',
'nl',
'pl',
'pt',
'ro',
'sv',
'da',
'fi',
'el',
'hu',
];
// Act
const articles = generateNewsForLanguages(languages);
// Assert
expect(articles).toHaveLength(14);
languages.forEach((lang) => {
expect(articles.find((a) => a.language === lang)).toBeDefined();
});
});
});
Edge Case Testing
Every function must test:
- β Happy path (expected input)
- β Boundary conditions (empty arrays, max lengths)
- β Invalid input (null, undefined, malformed data)
- β Error handling and recovery
π― Compliance Mapping
ISO 27001 Alignment
| Control | Requirement | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| A.8.9 | Configuration Management | Version-controlled test plans |
| A.14.2 | Testing in Development | Automated unit testing |
| A.14.3 | Test Data Protection | Sanitized test data only |
NIST CSF Alignment
| Function | Category | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| PR.IP-1 | Baseline Configuration | Vitest config management |
| PR.IP-2 | SDLC Integration | Unit tests in CI/CD pipeline |
CIS Controls Alignment
| Control | Description | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 16.9 | Automated Testing | Unit test automation |
| 16.10 | Test Environment | Isolated test execution |
π Related Documentation
- π E2E Test Plan β End-to-end testing
- β‘ Performance Testing β Performance benchmarks
- ποΈ Architecture β System design
- π‘οΈ Security Architecture β Security controls
- βοΈ Workflows β CI/CD documentation
- π‘οΈ CRA Assessment β Testing evidence for CRA
π Document Control:
β
Approved by: James Pether SΓΆrling, CEO
π€ Distribution: Public
π·οΈ Classification:
π―
Framework Compliance: