performance-testing.md

February 24, 2026 Β· View on GitHub

Hack23 Logo

⚑ EU Parliament Monitor β€” Performance Testing & Benchmarks

Comprehensive Performance Validation & Monitoring Framework
πŸš€ Lighthouse Audits β€’ πŸ“Š Page Load Optimization β€’ ⚑ Static Site Performance

Owner Version Effective Date Review Cycle

πŸ“‹ Document Owner: CEO | πŸ“„ Version: 1.0 | πŸ“… Last Updated: 2026-02-20 (UTC)
πŸ”„ Review Cycle: Quarterly | ⏰ Next Review: 2026-05-20


πŸ“š Architecture Documentation Map

DocumentFocusDescriptionDocumentation Link
ArchitectureπŸ›οΈ ArchitectureC4 model showing current system structureView Source
Future ArchitectureπŸ›οΈ ArchitectureC4 model showing future system structureView Source
Mindmaps🧠 ConceptCurrent system component relationshipsView Source
Future Mindmaps🧠 ConceptFuture capability evolutionView Source
SWOT AnalysisπŸ’Ό BusinessCurrent strategic assessmentView Source
Future SWOT AnalysisπŸ’Ό BusinessFuture strategic opportunitiesView Source
Data ModelπŸ“Š DataCurrent data structures and relationshipsView Source
Future Data ModelπŸ“Š DataEnhanced European Parliament data architectureView Source
FlowchartsπŸ”„ ProcessCurrent data processing workflowsView Source
Future FlowchartsπŸ”„ ProcessEnhanced AI-driven workflowsView Source
State DiagramsπŸ”„ BehaviorCurrent system state transitionsView Source
Future State DiagramsπŸ”„ BehaviorEnhanced adaptive state transitionsView Source
Security ArchitectureπŸ›‘οΈ SecurityCurrent security implementationView Source
Future Security ArchitectureπŸ›‘οΈ SecuritySecurity enhancement roadmapView Source
Threat Model🎯 SecuritySTRIDE threat analysisView Source
Classification🏷️ GovernanceCIA classification & BCPView Source
CRA AssessmentπŸ›‘οΈ ComplianceCyber Resilience ActView Source
Workflowsβš™οΈ DevOpsCI/CD documentationView Source
Future WorkflowsπŸš€ DevOpsPlanned CI/CD enhancementsView Source
Business Continuity PlanπŸ”„ ResilienceRecovery planningView Source
Financial Security PlanπŸ’° FinancialCost & security analysisView Source
End-of-Life StrategyπŸ“¦ LifecycleTechnology EOL planningView Source
Unit Test PlanπŸ§ͺ TestingUnit testing strategyView Source
E2E Test PlanπŸ” TestingEnd-to-end testingView Source
Performance Testing⚑ PerformancePerformance benchmarksView Source
Security PolicyπŸ”’ SecurityVulnerability reporting & security policyView Source

🎯 Purpose & Scope

This document establishes the comprehensive performance testing strategy, benchmarks, and optimization practices for the EU Parliament Monitor platform, ensuring optimal user experience across all 14 language versions. Aligned with Hack23 ISMS Secure Development Policy Β§8 "Performance Testing & Monitoring Framework".

Performance validation ensures:

  • βœ… Fast page loads for static HTML/CSS content (<2s)
  • βœ… Optimal asset sizes within performance budgets
  • βœ… Lighthouse scores meeting quality standards (90+ performance)
  • βœ… Multi-language content renders efficiently
  • βœ… ISO 27001 (A.8.26) compliance for capacity management
  • βœ… NIST CSF (ID.AM-1) compliance for asset performance

πŸ“Š Performance Standards & Targets

🎯 Lighthouse Audit Targets

MetricTarget ScorePriority
Performance90+βœ… High
Accessibility95+βœ… High
Best Practices95+βœ… High
SEO95+βœ… High

⚑ Page Load Time Targets

MetricTargetMeasurement
Initial Load<2 secondsGitHub Pages deployment
Time to Interactive (TTI)<3 secondsLighthouse audit
First Contentful Paint (FCP)<1.5 secondsCore Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)<2.5 secondsCore Web Vitals
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)<0.1Core Web Vitals

πŸ“¦ Asset Size Targets

ResourceBudgetNotes
HTML per page<50 KBSingle page static HTML
CSS<20 KBSingle stylesheet (styles.css)
Total per page<100 KBIncluding all assets
News articles<30 KB eachGenerated HTML content

πŸ—οΈ Static Site Performance Advantages

EU Parliament Monitor's static site architecture provides inherent performance benefits:

graph LR
    subgraph "Performance Architecture"
        U[User Request] --> CDN[GitHub Pages CDN]
        CDN --> |Cached| HTML[Static HTML]
        CDN --> |Cached| CSS[styles.css]
        HTML --> R[Rendered Page]
        CSS --> R
    end

    subgraph "Performance Benefits"
        B1[No Server Processing]
        B2[CDN Edge Caching]
        B3[No Database Queries]
        B4[Pre-rendered Content]
    end

    style CDN fill:#c8e6c9
    style R fill:#e3f2fd
πŸš€ AdvantageπŸ“‹ Impact
No server-side processingZero TTFB (Time to First Byte) overhead
CDN edge cachingContent served from nearest edge location
No database queriesEliminates query latency
Pre-rendered HTMLNo client-side rendering delay
Minimal JavaScriptFaster parse and execute

πŸ”¬ Performance Testing Procedures

1. Lighthouse Audit

Local Testing:

# Install Lighthouse CLI
npm install -g lighthouse

# Run audit on deployed site
lighthouse https://hack23.github.io/euparliamentmonitor/ --view

# Run audit on specific language version
lighthouse https://hack23.github.io/euparliamentmonitor/index-fr.html --view

2. Multi-Language Performance Validation

All 14 language versions should meet the same performance targets:

LanguageIndex PageTarget Load
Englishindex.html<2s
Swedishindex-sv.html<2s
Danishindex-da.html<2s
Norwegianindex-no.html<2s
Finnishindex-fi.html<2s
Germanindex-de.html<2s
Frenchindex-fr.html<2s
Spanishindex-es.html<2s
Dutchindex-nl.html<2s
Arabicindex-ar.html<2s
Hebrewindex-he.html<2s
Japaneseindex-ja.html<2s
Koreanindex-ko.html<2s
Chineseindex-zh.html<2s

3. Build Performance

MetricTargetMeasurement
Lint time<30snpm run lint
Unit test time<60snpm run test
E2E test time<5 minnpm run test:e2e
News generation<5 minnpm run generate-news

πŸ“ˆ Performance Optimization Best Practices

HTML Optimization

  • βœ… Semantic HTML5 elements
  • βœ… Minimal inline styles
  • βœ… Proper heading hierarchy
  • βœ… Lazy loading for images (if applicable)

CSS Optimization

  • βœ… Single stylesheet (styles.css)
  • βœ… No unused CSS rules
  • βœ… Efficient selectors
  • βœ… CSS custom properties for theming

Network Optimization

  • βœ… GitHub Pages CDN caching
  • βœ… Minimal HTTP requests (single CSS file)
  • βœ… No external JavaScript dependencies
  • βœ… Compressed responses (automatic via GitHub Pages)

πŸ“Š Performance Regression Prevention

Automated Monitoring

πŸ”§ ToolπŸ“‹ CheckπŸ”„ Frequency
ESLintCode qualityEvery push/PR
HTMLHintHTML qualityEvery push/PR
Playwright E2EFunctional performanceEvery push/PR
LighthousePerformance scoresPeriodic manual

Manual Testing Schedule

πŸ“… ActivityπŸ”„ Frequency
Lighthouse audit (all languages)Quarterly
Page load time measurementMonthly
Asset size analysisPer release
Mobile performance testingQuarterly

🎯 Compliance Mapping

ISO 27001 Alignment

ControlRequirementImplementation
A.8.26Capacity ManagementPerformance budgets, monitoring and asset size tracking

NIST CSF Alignment

FunctionCategoryImplementation
ID.AM-1Asset ManagementPerformance characteristics documented
PR.IP-2Information ProtectionPerformance validation in CI/CD

CIS Controls Alignment

ControlDescriptionImplementation
16.12Application SecurityPerformance doesn't degrade security
16.13Performance MonitoringContinuous performance tracking

πŸ“‹ Performance Testing Checklist

Before Release:

  • Lighthouse audit scores >90 (all categories)
  • All 14 language pages load in <2 seconds
  • HTML file sizes within budget (<50 KB each)
  • CSS file size within budget (<20 KB)
  • No layout shifts (CLS <0.1)
  • E2E tests pass
  • Mobile responsiveness validated
  • Accessibility score >95

Internal Documentation

External Resources


πŸ“‹ Document Control:
βœ… Approved by: James Pether SΓΆrling, CEO
πŸ“€ Distribution: Public
🏷️ Classification: Confidentiality: Public Integrity: Moderate Availability: Standard
🎯 Framework Compliance: ISO 27001 NIST CSF 2.0 CIS Controls